Skip to main content

Reshaping Business Models with an Environmental Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

This chapter aims to compare the most common sustainable business models with the methodologies that have been designed in order for companies to embrace sustainability. The methodology deployed has been based on a state of art of the scientific literature about environmental methodologies and the analysis of successful sustainable business models. The results show that those methodologies are useful for improving specific areas or business units from organizations, but they don’t offer a holistic point of view for embedding sustainability among the business model. Currently, companies are concerned about environment and are trying to offer a value proposition based on sustainability. However, only a few companies are able to become sustainable in a successful way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accenture. (2013). The UN global compact-Accenture CEO study on sustainability 2013. Accenture Sustainability Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Allwood, J., Willey, A., & King, J. (2012). Development of a tool to rapidly assess implementation difficulty and emissions reduction benefits of innovations. Technovation, 32(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65(2014), 42e56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonini, S., & Görner. S. (2011). The business of sustainability. McKinsey Global Survey Results. Available from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/the-business-of-sustainability-mckinsey-global-survey-results.

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2012). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. C. J., Yang, C.-L., & Sheu, C. (2014) The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Retrieved from http://krex.ksu.edu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T., & McMullen, J. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2007), 50–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D., & Winston, A. (2006). Green to gold. How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • França, C. L., Bromana, G., Karl-Henrik, R., Basile, B., & Trygg, L. (2016). An approach to business model innovation and design for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(Part 1), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, S., & Clausen, T. H. (2016). Innovating for a greener future: The direct and indirect effects of firms’ environmental objectives on the innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Christensen, C., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review. December 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(2016), 1474–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, A., Wehrmeyer, W., & France, C. (2010). The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding. Management Research Review, 33(11), 1022–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León-Soriano, R., Muñoz-Torres, M., & Chalmeta-Rosaleñ, R. (2010). Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2014). Creativity and organizational learning as means to foster sustainability. Sustainable Development, 22(3), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework of business models for sustainability. In: ERSCP-EMU Conference (pp. 1–28). Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont, O., & Tukker, A. (2006). Product–service Systems: Reviewing achievements and refining the research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1451–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley: Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), September–October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Vilá, O., & Bharadwaj, S. (2017). Competing on social purpose. Harvard Business Review. September–October 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría Técnica del Laboratorio de Ecoinnovación. (2016). Informe de Tendencias #1: Modelos de Negocio Ecoinnovadores. Available from http://www.laboratorioecoinnovacion.com/informes_de_tendencias.

  • Tsai, K. H., & Liao, Y. C. (2017). Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco‐innovation: Toward a contingency perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (p. 38). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquín Sánchez-Planelles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sánchez-Planelles, J., Segarra-Oña, M. (2019). Reshaping Business Models with an Environmental Perspective. In: Golinska-Dawson, P., Spychała, M. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors. EcoProduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics