Approaches of User-Centered Interaction Development for Highly Automated Vehicles in Traffic-Jam Scenarios

  • Felix Wulf
  • Maria Rimini-Doering
  • Marc Arnon
  • Frank Gauterin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 200)


In the recent years one of the goals of driver assistance systems has been to disburden the driver of parts of the driving task. Current developments are able to take over full control of the vehicle in specific use cases. One of the main challenges is to maintain the driver’s ability to take back the responsibility while being driven by the car. As it is assumed that the driver’s main benefit of such systems is the possibility to perform secondary tasks, a target conflict comes up. This paper describes a systematic approach to derive new ways of interaction between the driver and the automated vehicle. Traffic jam situations are chosen as the example situational context for this paper since they are one of the first expected use cases for automated driver assistance systems. By incorporating knowledge of experts of interdisciplinary fields in an innovation workshop, multiple points of view towards the given problem are enabled. For good rated ideas the generalized functional principle is formulated which describes how the user is kept aware of his supervision task. The resulting functional examples are decoupled from the initial ideas by deriving them only from these principles.


Driver assistance Automation Traffic jam Human–machine interaction Driver attentiveness 


  1. 1.
    Abendroth B, Bruder R (2009) Die Leistungsfähigkeit des Menschen für die Fahrzeugführung. In: Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Grundlagen, Komponenten und Systeme für aktive Sicherheit und Komfort. Vieweg + Teubner, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bainbridge L (1983) Ironies of automation. Automatica 16(6):775–779Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Endsley M (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freyer J et al (2010) Eine Spur aufmerksamer – Der Audi active lane assist. ATZ 112(12):926–930Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gasser TM et al (2012) Gemeinsamer Schlussbericht: BASt Projektgruppe „Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung“. Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Bergisch GladbachGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gausemeier J, Ebbesmeyer P, Kallmeyer F (2001) Produktinnovation – Strategische Planung und Entwicklung der Produkte von morgen. Carl Hanser Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hörwick M, Wimmer M (2010) Fahrerüberwachungs- und Interaktionskonzept für hochautomatisierte Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Fortschrittsberichte VDI, Reihe 22: Mensch-Maschine-Systeme 32:123–135Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaber D, Endsley M (1997) Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Saf Programs 16(3):126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pahl G, Beitz W (2007) Konstruktionslehre – Grundlagen erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung – Methoden und Anwendung. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rauch N et al (2009) The importance of driver state assessment within highly automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 16th world congress and exhibition on intelligent transport systems and services, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rauch N (2009) Ein verhaltensbasiertes Messmodell zur Erfassung von Situationsbewusstsein im Fahrkontext. Universität Würzburg, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanton N, Marsden P (1996) From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Saf Sci 24(1):35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weilkes M, Buerkle L, Rentschler T (2006) Lane-keeping-support: from haptic lane-departure warning towards semi-autonomous lane guidance. In: Aachener Kolloquium für Fahrzeug- und Motorentechnik, pp 909–920Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winner H et al (2003) ACC adaptive cruise control. Robert Bosch GmbH, PlochingenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Wulf
    • 1
  • Maria Rimini-Doering
    • 1
  • Marc Arnon
    • 1
  • Frank Gauterin
    • 2
  1. 1.Robert Bosch GmbHStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations