Advertisement

Wheel Load Oriented Control of Semi-Active and Active Suspension Systems Using Pre-Located Road Sampling

  • Sebastian SpirkEmail author
  • Kay-Uwe Henning
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 201)

Abstract

The conflict of objectives in vertical suspension control could be significantly eased by adjusting the settings of stiffness and damping according to the actual driving state. With an adaptive reference model based control emulating a passive suspension with time-varying stiffness and damping coefficient this can be realized using an active or hybrid suspension system. The concept offers huge benefits in comfort for smooth and uncritical excitations. However, in safety critical situations the possibilities for a safety-oriented setting are limited to the dynamic wheel load Pareto-optimal configuration reachable of passive suspensions. Using road profile information, gained by vertically sampling the road underneath the vehicle, a wheel load optimal disturbance compensation can be derived and is applied to a semi-active and hybrid suspension system. Applying this transparent feedforward control law in combination with a reference model based control, dynamic wheel load deviations can be significantly reduced while additionally reducing chassis accelerations.

Keywords

Active vehicle suspensions Semi-active dampers Vehicle dynamics Vehicle suspensions Disturbance compensation 

References

  1. 1.
    Heißing B, Ersoy M (2010) Chassis handbook: fundamentals, driving dynamics, components, mechatronics, perspectives. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wong JY (2008) Theory of ground vehicles. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitschke M, Wallentowitz H (2004) “Dynamik der Kraftfahrzeuge“. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koch G, Spirk S, Lohmann B (2010) Reference model based adaptive control of a hybrid suspension. In: Proceedings of the IFAC symposium advances in automotive control, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch G, Spirk S, Pellegrini E, Pletschen N, Lohmann B (2011) Experimental validation of a new adaptive control approach for a hybrid suspension system. In: Proceedings of the 2011 American control conference, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spirk S (2012) Adaptive Regelung aktiver Fahrwerke. Diplomarbeit. Bachelor + Master Publishing, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koch G, Fritsch O, Lohmann B (2008) Potential of low bandwidth active suspension control with continuously variable damper. In: Proceedings of the 17th IFAC world congress, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spirk S, Koch G, Lohmann B (2011) Improving suspension control with an optimal control component and disturbance compensation. In: 18th IFAC world congress, Milano, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matschinsky W (1998) Road vehicle suspensions. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 2631-1 (1997) Mechanical vibration and shock–evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. International Standard OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Streiter R (2008) Active preview suspension system—ABC Prescan in the F700. ATZ worldwide eMagazines, Vieweg + Teubner, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guglielmino E,Sireteanu T, Stammers CW, Ghita G, Giuclea M (2008) Semi-active suspension control: improved vehicle ride and road friendliness. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Automatic ControlTechnischeUniversität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations