Skip to main content

Finite Element Analysis of Cervical Spinal Nerve Tissue Tolerance to Whiplash Injury: A Preliminary Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 197))

Abstract

Research and/or Engineering Questions/Objective Whiplash can occur in frontal, side and rear car collisions but most complaints occur in rear collision by another vehicle. Whiplash can produce acute and chronic neck pain, headache, paresthesia, or even paralysis. The facet capsule, intervertebral discs, cervical ligaments, and cervical spinal nerves can be injured during whiplash. Injury to the nerve can result in more severe clinical symptoms, including motor, sensory, and sphincter disturbance. But the accelerations that can cause nerve injury are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the threshold chest acceleration that causes cervical spinal nerve injury using finite element (FE) methods. Methodology Multi-slice CT images with 1.2 mm slice distance of a de-identified adult male were used to construct the three-dimensional FE model of cervical spine components using Mimics software. FE components include the head, neck, upper thorax, ligament, intervertebral disks, ligaments, and muscle fascias. The elements in the FE model components were reconstructed for a better quality using ANSA and Hypermesh software. Acceleration curves obtained from volunteer rear impact tests were input into the FE model and run using LS-DYNA. The FE model was validated by comparing the head movement corridor with volunteer data. Strain on the cervical spinal nerve was used to determine the injury probability based on our neurophysiology and biomechanical in vivo experimental data. Results Mimics software provided an effective and rapid approach to build a FE model. An increase of chest acceleration caused an increase of the strain of the spinal nerve. The maximum stretch speed of the spinal nerves was showed to be 199 ± 23 mm/sec from the simulation of rear impact. 7 Gs chest acceleration produced a maximum 24 % strain of the spinal nerve resulting in a 40 % probability of spinal nerve injury. The highest strain was found to be in the 3rd cervical spinal nerve. Increased acceleration in the shoulder more than 7 Gs did not cause further increase of nerve strain in the simulation. Limitations of this study The limitation of this study is that only the cervical spine, head and upper shoulder model was used in the computer simulation. It will be better if the whole vehicle and whole body FE model was constructed for our research. In addition, muscle biofidelities were not simulated in this model. What does the paper offer that is new in the field in comparison to other works of the author Currently, most research uses ANSYS software to construct FE models, which is a tedious procedure. Mimics, ANSA, and HyperMesh software combined applications provided a new and rapid approach to build a human FE model, yet the element quality can be better controlled. This paper first reported a research of spinal nerve tolerance to whiplash injury using FE analysis methods. Conclusion Mimics, ANSA, and HyperMesh software combined applications provided a new and rapid approach to build a human FE model, yet the element quality can be better controlled. Our neck finite element model was the first FE model developed to study the spinal nerve tolerance to whiplash injury. The model validation was performed at the global level by tracking the head kinematics. The simulation results corresponded to clinical scenarios and volunteer testing outcomes. Our simulation demonstrated that 6 Gs chest accelerations with no headrest may cause 25 % probability of cervical spinal nerve injury. Increased chest acceleration to 9, or 10 Gs did not cause further increase of spinal nerve maximum strain, or injury probability. A higher strain was frequently found in the C3 spinal nerve under different chest accelerations.

F2012-F05-006

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martin D (1998) The acute traumatic central cord syndrome. In: Gunzburg R (ed) Whiplash injury: current concepts in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the servical whiplash syndrome, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 129–133

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrari R (1999) The whiplash encyclopedia: the facts and myths of whiplash, 1st edn. In: Robert F (ed) Aspen Publishers Inc, Gaithersburg, pp 449–470

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hedenstierna S, Halldin P (2008) How does a three-dimensional continuum muscle model affect the kinematics and muscle strains of a finite element neck model compared to a discrete muscle model in rear-end, frontal, and lateral impacts. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(8):E236–245

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh A, Lu Y, Chen C, Cavanaugh JM (2006) Mechanical properties of spinal nerve roots subjected to tension at different strain rates. J Biomech 39(9):1669–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh A, Kallakuri S, Chen C, Cavanaugh JM (2009) Structural and functional changes in nerve roots due to tension at various strains and strain rates: an in vivo study. J Neurotrauma 26(4):627–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer S (1998) The minimal collision velocity for whiplash. In: Gunzburg R (ed) Whiplash injury: current concepts in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the cervical whiplash syndrome, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 107–109

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen C, Virk GS, Yaldo J, Guruprakash GK, Kallakuri S, Cavanaugh JM (2011) The effects of strain and displacement rate on spinal nerve injury and recovery. In: Proceedings of annual meeting of orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California, pp 1274

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E (1995) Scientific monograph of the quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(8 Suppl):pp. 1S–73S

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N (1994) Lack of effect of intraarticular corticosteroids for chronic pain in the cervical zygapophyseal joints. N Engl J Med 330(15):1047–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Winkelstein BA, Nightingale RW, Richardson WJ, Myers BS (2000) The cervical facet capsule and its role in whiplash injury: a biomechanical investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(10):1238–1246

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deans GT, Magalliard JN, Kerr M, Rutherford WH (1987) Neck sprain–a major cause of disability following car accidents. Injury 18(1):10–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang JG, Wang F, Zhou R, Xue Q (2011) A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine: an investigation of whiplash injury. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(2):193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N (1994) Third occipital nerve headache: a prevalence study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57(10):1187–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott MW, M.W., Guzman HM, Howard RP, Bomar JB, Smith HL (1993) Comparison of human and ATD head kinematics during low-speed rearend impacts. In: Proceedings of the thirty seventh stapp car crash conference, Warrendale, PA, SAE Paper# 930094

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenbluth W, Hicks L (1994) Evaluating low-speed rear-end impact severity and resultant occupant stress parameters. J Forensic Sci 39(6):1393–1424

    Google Scholar 

  16. West DH, Gough JP, Harper G (1993) Low speed rear-end collision testing using human subjects. Accid Reconstr J 5:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  17. Castro WH, Schilgen M, Meyer S, Weber M, Peuker C, Wortler K (1997) Do “whiplash injuries” occur in low-speed rear impacts? Eur Spine J 6(6):366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar S, Narayan Y, Amell T (2002) An electromyographic study of low-velocity rear-end impacts. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(10):1044–1055

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szabo T, Welcher J, Anderson R (1994) Human occupant kinematic response to low speed rear-end impacts. In; Proceedings of the thirty eighth stapp car crash conference, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, SAE paper # 930094

    Google Scholar 

  20. McConnell W, Howard RP, Guzman HM, Bomar JB, Raddin JH, Benedict JV (1993) Analysis of human test subject kinematic responses to low velocity rear end impacts. In: Proceedings of the thirty seventh stapp car crash conference, Warrendale, PA, SAE Paper# 930889

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ono K, Kanno M (1996) Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. Accid Anal Prev 28(4):493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siegmund G, Williamson PB (1993) Speed change (Δv) of amusement park bumper cars. In: Proceedings of the Canadian multidisciplinary road safety conference VIII, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, June 14–16, 1993, pp 299–308

    Google Scholar 

  23. Geigl B, Steffan H, Leinzinger P, Roll P, Muhlbauer M, Bauer G (1994) The movement of head and cervical spine during rearend impact. In: Proceedings of International IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts, Lyon, France 1994, pp 127–137

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matsushita T, Sato TB, Hirabayashi K, Fujimura S, Asazuzma T, Takatori T (1994) X-Ray study of the human neck motion due to head inertia loading. In: Proceedings of the thirty eighth stapp car crash conference, Warrendale, PA, SAE Paper# 942208

    Google Scholar 

  25. McConnell W, Howard RP, Poppel JV, Krause R, Guzman HM, Bomar JB, Raddin JH, Benedict JV, Hatsell CP (1995) Human head and neck kinematics after low velocity rear-end impacts: understanding whiplash. In: Proceedings of the thirty nine stapp car crash conference, Warrendale, PA, 1995, SAE Paper# 952724

    Google Scholar 

  26. DuBois R, McNally BF, DiGregorio JS, Phillips GJ (1996) Low velocity car-to-bus test impacts. Accid Reconstr J 8:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brault JR, Wheeler JB, Siegmund GP, Brault EJ (1998) Clinical response of human subjects to rear-end automobile collisions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79(1):72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Howard RP, Bowles AP, Guzman HM, Krenrich SW (1998) Head, neck, and mandible dynamics generated by ‘whiplash’. Accid Anal Prev 30(4):525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (KF11011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, C., Cheng, B., Huang, C., Jiang, B., Chen, D., Tao, X. (2013). Finite Element Analysis of Cervical Spinal Nerve Tissue Tolerance to Whiplash Injury: A Preliminary Study. In: Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 197. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33805-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33805-2_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33804-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33805-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics