Skip to main content

Development of a Parametric Vehicle Front Structure Model for Pedestrian Impact Simulations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 197))

Abstract

In this study, a simplified, parametric vehicle front structure was proposed to represent the real vehicle when impacted with full-scale finite element pedestrian human body model (HBM). To capture the real impact responses of human lower limbs, the real vehicle energy-absorbing structures were modeled using distributed beam elements and deformable shell elements to replicate the contact characteristics between vehicle and HBM. An investigation of vehicle front-end profile characteristics in worldwide popular sedan models was conducted to determine the ranges of geometry variables. A local stiffness measurement approach is also proposed. The simplified model is further validated using a detailed sedan model, and the impact responses of HBM in the two simulations correlate quite well with each other. Therefore it can be further used in the DOE study or optimization work in the vehicle front structure design for pedestrian lower limb impact protection.

F2012-F03-004

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IHRA (2001) International harmonized research activities pedestrian safety working group, report. Version 2, December 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang J (2005) Review of injury biomechanics in car-pedestrian collisions. Int J Veh Saf 1(2005):100–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Teresinski G, Madro R (2001) Knee joint injuries as a reconstructive factor in car-to-pedestrian accidents. Forensic Sci Int 124:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. EEVC WG17 (2002) Improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. Report, December 1998, updates September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  5. Issiki T, Konosu A, Tanahashi M (2007) Development of an FE biofidelic flexible pedestrian leg-form impactor (Flex-GT-prototype) model. Paper number 07-0179, 20th ESV conference, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glasson E, Maistre V, Laurent C (2001) Car front end module structure development regarding pedestrian protection and other mechanical constraints. 2001 SAE world congress, paper number 2001-01-0761, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  7. Neal M, Tu J, Jones D (2008) A response surface-based tool for evaluating vehicle performance in the pedestrian leg impact test. 2008 SAE world congress, paper number 2008-01-1244, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neal M (2004) Front structure design procedure for optimal pedestrian leg impact performance. 2004 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, pp 199–207

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shuler S, Mooijman F, Nanda A, Surisetty G (2005) Improved energy absorber and vehicle design strategies for pedestrian protection. 2005 SAE world congress. paper number 2005-01-1872, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uikey D, Evans D, Abad S et al (2005) Design exploration of bumper systems using advanced CAE techniques. 2005 SAE world congress, paper number 2005-01-1340, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishikawa T, Kore H, Furumoto A, Kuroda S (2003) Evaluation of pedestrian protection structures using impactors and full-scale dummy tests. Paper number 271, 18th ESV conference, Nagoya, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konosu A, Issiki T, Tanahashi M, Suzuki H (2007) Development of a biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor type GT (Flex-GT). Paper number 07-0178, 20th ESV conference, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schuster P, Chou C, Prasad P, Jayaraman G (2000) Development and validation of a pedestrian lower limb non-linear 3-D finite element model. 44th Stapp car crash conference, paper number 2000-01-SC21, Atlanta, GA, United States

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi Y, Kikuchi Y, Mori F, Konosu A (2003) Advanced FE lower limb model for pedestrians. Paper number 218, 18th ESV conference, Nagoya, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuwahara S, Hosokawa T, Okada K, Mizuno K (2007) Finite element analysis of pedestrian lower extremity injuries in car-to-pedestrian impacts. 2007 SAE world congress, paper number 2007-01-0755, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yasuki T (2007) Mechanism analysis of pedestrian knee-bending angle by sedan-type vehicle using human FE model. Int J Crashworth 12:329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng B, Wang JT, Hahn W (2007) Human model for real-world vehicle-pedestrian impact simulations. In: International symposium of human modeling and simulation in automotive safety, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kerrigan J, Crandall J, Deng B (2007) Pedestrian Kinematic Response to Mid-sized Vehicle Impact. Int J Veh Saf 2(3):221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Untaroiu C, Darvish K, Crandall J, Deng B, Wang JT (2005) A finite element model for the lower limb for simulating pedestrian impacts. Stapp Car Crash J 49:157–181

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kerrigan J, Bhalla K, Madeley N, Funk J, Bose D, Crandall J (2003) Experiments for establishing pedestrian-impact lower limb injury criteria. 2003 SAE world congress, paper number 2003-01-0895, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ivarsson J, Lessley D, Kerrigan J, Bhalla K, Bose D, Crandall J, Kent R (2004) Dynamic response corridors and injury thresholds of the pedestrian lower extremities. International research council on biomechanics of injury conference (IRCOBI), GRAZ, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  22. Glasson E, Maistre V, Laurent C (2001) Car front end module structure development regarding pedestrian protection and other mechanical constraints. 2001 SAE world congress, paper number 2001-01-0761, Detroit, Michigan, United States

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dunmore M, Brooks R, Madeley N, Mcnally D (2006) The effect of leg fracture level and vehicle front-end geometry on pedestrian knee injury and response. Proc Inst Mech Eng 220:857–869

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez L, Guerra L, Ferichola G, Garcia A (2007) Stiffness corridors of the European fleet for pedestrian simulations. 20th ESV conference, paper number 07-0267, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mizuno Y (2003) Summary of IHRA pedestrian safety WG activities (2003)—proposed test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. 18th ESV conference, paper number 580, Nagoya, Japan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Altair for providing us with the educational license for HyperWorks. We also thank LSTC for providing us with the educational license for LS-DYNA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Investigation of Vehicle Profile Characteristics

Appendix: Investigation of Vehicle Profile Characteristics

To determine proper range of the geometry variables, an investigation of vehicle profile characteristics was conducted focusing on the worldwide sedan models produced between 2008 and 2010. The approach is similar to the investigation on vehicle front profile characteristics by International Harmonized Research Activities (IHRA) in 2003 [25]. The profile data were extracted from the Internet, and validated by typical variables published by car manufacturers, such as total length, height, and wheelbase. Then the profile curves of all the sedans were aligned and plotted in one figure, where axis of abscissa is the ground line and axis of ordinates is the vertical longitudinal line of the bumper front edge (Fig. 11). Figure 12 shows the definitions of the measure points for the bumper lead (BL), bumper center-line height (BCH), leading edge height (LEH), bonnet length, bonnet angle, windscreen angle and the bottom depth and height of the front skirt.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Sedan front profile corridors

Fig. 12
figure 12

Definitions of the vehicle front profile parameters

The lower and upper bounds and average value of each variable are summarized in Table 2. The results of the vehicle front profile characteristics were used to determine the range of the design variables for further DOE study.

Table 2 Corridors of the vehicle front profile parameters (Sedan + Hatchback, n = 35)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nie, B., Huang, J., Xia, Y., Zhou, Q., Deng, B., Neal, M. (2013). Development of a Parametric Vehicle Front Structure Model for Pedestrian Impact Simulations. In: Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 197. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33805-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33805-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33804-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33805-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics