Abstract
A major challenge in adopting UML in industrial environments is the lack of accessibility and comprehensibility of some diagram types by non-technical stakeholders. Literate Modeling improves comprehension of these diagrams by adding narrative text, but lacks good tool support for synchronizing model and text. This paper presents an approach for keeping model and text synchronized by effectively combining state-of-the-art natural language processing technology with OCL model querying. Thereby, consistency of element names in the UML model with their counterparts in the text is achieved by using text annotations to provide the semantic link. At a structural level, we propose an algorithm that checks element relationships in the UML model using a set of validation constraints when particular sentence characteristics are detected. An analysis of the runtime complexity shows the feasibility of including the proposed solution in one of today’s CASE tools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arlow, J., Emmerich, W., Quinn, J.A.: Literate Modelling — Capturing Business Knowledge with the UML. In: Bézivin, J., Muller, P.-A. (eds.) UML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1618, pp. 189–199. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Arlow, J., Neustadt, I.: Enterprise Patterns and MDA: Building Better Software with Archetype Patterns and UML. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)
Arlow, J., Neustadt, I.: Secrets of Analysis: Generative Analysis with M++, UML 2 and Literate Modelling (book, to be published)
Berardi, D., Cali, A., Calvanese, D., Di Giacomo, G.: Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artificial Intelligence 168, 2005 (2003)
Conway, D.M.: An algorithmic approach to English pluralization. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Perl Conference, San Jose, CA, USA (August 1998)
Cook, S., Nguyen, P.: Logical Foundations of Proof Complexity, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)
de Marneffe, M.-C., Manning, C.D.: The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Coling 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, CrossParser 2008, Manchester, UK, pp. 1–8 (August 2008)
Deeptimahanti, D.K., Sanyal, R.: An Innovative Approach for Generating Static UML Models from Natural Language Requirements. In: Kim, T.-h., Fang, W.-C., Lee, C., Arnett, K.P. (eds.) ASEA 2008. CCIS, vol. 30, pp. 147–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Denti, E., Omicini, A., Ricci, A.: tuProlog: A Light-Weight Prolog for Internet Applications and Infrastructures. In: Ramakrishnan, I.V. (ed.) PADL 2001. LNCS, vol. 1990, pp. 184–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Denti, E., Omicini, A., Ricci, A.: Multi-paradigm Java-Prolog integration in tuProlog. Science of Computer Programming 57, 217–250 (2005)
Dzidek, W.J.: Empirical Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of UML in Software Maintenance. PhD thesis, University of Oslo (2006)
Dzidek, W.J., Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C.: A Realistic Empirical Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of UML in Software Maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 34, 407–432 (2008)
Harmain, H.M., Gaizauskas, R.: CM-Builder: A natural language-based CASE tool for object-oriented analysis. Automated Software Engineering 10, 157–181 (2003)
Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2003), Sapporo, Japanvol. 1, pp. 423–430 (May 2003)
Lavoie, B., Rambow, O., Reiter, E.: Customizable descriptions of object-oriented models. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP 1997), Washington D.C., WA, USA, pp. 253–256 (March 1997)
Meziane, F., Athanasakis, N., Ananiadou, S.: Generating Natural Language Specifications from UML Class Diagrams. Requirements Engineering 13(1), 1–18 (2008)
Object Management Group. Object Constraint Language. Version 2.2 (February 2010)
Pinggera, J., Porcham, T., Zugal, S., Weber, B.: LiProMo — Literate Process Modeling. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2012), pp. 163–170 (2012)
Schulze, G.: Synchronization of UML models and narrative text using model constraints and natural language processing. Master’s thesis, University of Innsbruck (June 2011)
Whittle, J., et al.: Empirical Assessment of the Efficacy of MDE (2010), http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/~eamde/
Wilke, C., Bartho, A., Schroeter, J., Karol, S., Aßmann, U.: Elucidative Development for Model-Based Documentation. In: Furia, C.A., Nanz, S. (eds.) TOOLS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7304, pp. 320–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Yue, T., Briand, L., Labiche, Y.: Automatically deriving a UML analysis model from a use case model. Technical Report 2010-15, Simula Research Laboratory (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schulze, G., Chimiak-Opoka, J., Arlow, J. (2012). An Approach for Synchronizing UML Models and Narrative Text in Literate Modeling. In: France, R.B., Kazmeier, J., Breu, R., Atkinson, C. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7590. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33665-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33666-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)