Skip to main content

Towards Using OWL Integrity Constraints in Ontology Engineering

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 Workshops (OTM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7567))

Abstract

In the GOPSL ontology engineering methodology, integrity constraints are used to guide communities in constraining their domain knowledge. This paper presents our investigation on OWL integrity constraints and its usage in ontology engineering.

This work was partially funded by the Brussels Institute for Research and Innovation through the Open Semantic Cloud for Brussels Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Debruyne, C., Meersman, R.: Semantic Interoperation of Information Systems by Evolving Ontologies through Formalized Social Processes. In: Eder, J., Bielikova, M., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) ADBIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6909, pp. 444–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Halpin, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kowalski, R.A.: Logic for data description. In: Logic and Data Bases, pp. 77–103 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lausen, G., Meier, M., Schmidt, M.: Sparqling constraints for rdf. In: EDBT, pp. 499–509 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Bridging the gap between owl and relational databases. J. Web Sem. 7(2), 74–89 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nonnengart, A., Weidenbach, C.: Computing small clause normal forms. In: Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 335–367 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reiter, R.: Towards a logical reconstruction of relational database theory. In: On Conceptual Modelling (Intervale), pp. 191–233 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter, R.: On integrity constraints. In: TARK, pp. 97–111. Morgan Kaufmann (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tao, J., Sirin, E., Bao, J., McGuinness, D.L.: Integrity constraints in owl. In: AAAI. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tran, TK., Debruyne, C. (2012). Towards Using OWL Integrity Constraints in Ontology Engineering. In: Herrero, P., Panetto, H., Meersman, R., Dillon, T. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 Workshops. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7567. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33618-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33618-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33617-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33618-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics