Aggregating Operational Knowledge in Community Settings

(Short Paper)
  • Srinath Srinivasa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7566)


In a community setting, operational knowledge or “knowledge that works,” refers to knowledge elements that can be put to use. This can be contrasted with encyclopedic knowledge or “knowledge that tells” that sets the background shared mental model among members of a population. Given any community, large amounts of operational knowledge are routinely diffused through social connections. While current day social media catalyzes such diffusion, they are not primarily suited to capture and represent knowledge. This paper argues that operational knowledge aggregation is in some sense, the opposite of encyclopedic knowledge aggregation. The latter is a convergent process that aggregates different local views into a global view; while the former is a divergent process, where common knowledge gets segregated into several local worlds of utilitarian knowledge. If the community as a whole is coherent, these different worlds end up denoting different aspects of the community’s dynamics. Local worlds are not independent of one another and characteristics of one local world affect characteristics of other local worlds. To capture this phenomenon, a data model called Many Worlds on a Frame (MWF) is proposed, that is detailed in this paper.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Srinivasa, S.: Many worlds on a frame: Aggregating operational knowledge in community settings. Technical report, Open Systems Laboratory, International Institute of Information Technology - Bangalore (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bon, G.: The Crowd. Transaction Publishers (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raafat, R.M., Chater, N., Frith, C.: Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(10), 420–428 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Razoumnikova, M.O.: Functional organization of different brain areas during convergent and divergent thinking: an eeg investigation. Cognitive Brain Research 10(1-2), 11–18 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garson, J.: Modal logic. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2009 edn. (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woo, C.: Kripke semantics (version 17),, Freely available at

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srinath Srinivasa
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute of Information TechnologyBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations