Abstract
In business process design, business objective models can fulfill the role of formal requirement definitions. Matching process models against objective models would, for instance, enable sound comparison of implementation alternatives. For that purpose, objective models should be available independently of their concrete implementation in a business process. This issue is not addressed by common business process management concepts yet. Moreover, process models are currently not sufficiently expressive to determine business process efficacy in the sense of fulfilling a business objective. Therefore, this paper develops and integrates constructs required for efficacy-aware process modeling and apt to extend common modeling approaches. The concept is illustrated with a sample scenario. Overall, it serves as an enabler for progressive applications like automated process optimization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Davenport, T.J., Short, J.E.: The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Mgmt. Rev. (4), 11–27 (1990)
Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Europ. J. of Inf. Syst. 15(1), 91–102 (2006)
The Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation: Version 2.0 (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0
Scheer, A.-W., Thomas, O., Adam, O.: Process Modeling Using Event-Driven Process Chains. In: Process-aware Information Systems, pp. 119–145. Wiley (2005)
Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer (to appear, 2012)
Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the Provop approach. J. Sw. Mnt. Ev. Res. Pract. 22(6-7), 519–546 (2010)
Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: Mining business process variants: Challenges, scenarios, algorithms. Data & Knowl. Eng. 70(5), 409–434 (2011)
Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Refactoring large process model repositories. Comput. Ind. 62(5), 467–486 (2011)
Camp, R.C.: Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Quality Press (1989)
IDS Scheer: Process intelligence white paper: What is process intelligence? (2009), http://www.process-intelligence.com
Lohrmann, M., Reichert, M.: Modeling Business Objectives for Business Process Management. In: Stary, C. (ed.) S-BPM ONE 2012. LNBIP, vol. 104, pp. 106–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press (1996)
March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)
Kueng, P., Kawalek, P.: Goal-based business process models: creation and evaluation. Bus. Process Manag. J. 3(1), 17–38 (1997)
Neiger, D., Churilov, L.: Goal-Oriented Business Process Modeling with EPCs and Value-Focused Thinking. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 98–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Markovic, I., Kowalkiewicz, M.: Linking business goals to process models in semantic business process modeling. In: Proc. 12th EDOC, pp. 332–338. IEEE (2008)
Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: On the notion of soft-goals in business process modeling. Bus. Process Manag. J. 11(6), 663–679 (2005)
Lin, Y., Sølvberg, A.: Goal Annotation of Process Models for Semantic Enrichment of Process Knowledge. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 355–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Engelsman, W., Quartel, D., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.: Extending enterprise architecture modelling with business goals and requirements. Ent. Inf. Sys. 5(1), 9–36 (2011)
Yu, E.S.K.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proc. 3rd Int’l Symp. on Requirements Engineering, pp. 226–235. IEEE (1997)
Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sc. of Comp. Programming 20(1-2), 3–50 (1993)
Ly, L.T., Knuplesch, D., Rinderle-Ma, S., Göser, K., Pfeifer, H., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: SeaFlows Toolset – Compliance Verification Made Easy for Process-Aware Information Systems. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Sølvberg, A.: Data and What They Refer to. In: Chen, P.P., Akoka, J., Kangassalu, H., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 1565, pp. 211–226. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd edn. MIT Press (2009)
Weske, M.: Business Process Management. Springer (2007)
Lohrmann, M., Reichert, M.: Formalizing concepts for efficacy-aware business process modeling. Technical Report UIB-2012-05, Databases and Information Systems Institute, Ulm University (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lohrmann, M., Reichert, M. (2012). Efficacy-Aware Business Process Modeling. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7565. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33605-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33606-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)