Skip to main content

Efficacy-Aware Business Process Modeling

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 (OTM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7565))

Abstract

In business process design, business objective models can fulfill the role of formal requirement definitions. Matching process models against objective models would, for instance, enable sound comparison of implementation alternatives. For that purpose, objective models should be available independently of their concrete implementation in a business process. This issue is not addressed by common business process management concepts yet. Moreover, process models are currently not sufficiently expressive to determine business process efficacy in the sense of fulfilling a business objective. Therefore, this paper develops and integrates constructs required for efficacy-aware process modeling and apt to extend common modeling approaches. The concept is illustrated with a sample scenario. Overall, it serves as an enabler for progressive applications like automated process optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davenport, T.J., Short, J.E.: The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Mgmt. Rev. (4), 11–27 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Europ. J. of Inf. Syst. 15(1), 91–102 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation: Version 2.0 (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0

  4. Scheer, A.-W., Thomas, O., Adam, O.: Process Modeling Using Event-Driven Process Chains. In: Process-aware Information Systems, pp. 119–145. Wiley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer (to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the Provop approach. J. Sw. Mnt. Ev. Res. Pract. 22(6-7), 519–546 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: Mining business process variants: Challenges, scenarios, algorithms. Data & Knowl. Eng. 70(5), 409–434 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Refactoring large process model repositories. Comput. Ind. 62(5), 467–486 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Camp, R.C.: Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Quality Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IDS Scheer: Process intelligence white paper: What is process intelligence? (2009), http://www.process-intelligence.com

  11. Lohrmann, M., Reichert, M.: Modeling Business Objectives for Business Process Management. In: Stary, C. (ed.) S-BPM ONE 2012. LNBIP, vol. 104, pp. 106–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kueng, P., Kawalek, P.: Goal-based business process models: creation and evaluation. Bus. Process Manag. J. 3(1), 17–38 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neiger, D., Churilov, L.: Goal-Oriented Business Process Modeling with EPCs and Value-Focused Thinking. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 98–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Markovic, I., Kowalkiewicz, M.: Linking business goals to process models in semantic business process modeling. In: Proc. 12th EDOC, pp. 332–338. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: On the notion of soft-goals in business process modeling. Bus. Process Manag. J. 11(6), 663–679 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, Y., Sølvberg, A.: Goal Annotation of Process Models for Semantic Enrichment of Process Knowledge. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 355–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Engelsman, W., Quartel, D., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.: Extending enterprise architecture modelling with business goals and requirements. Ent. Inf. Sys. 5(1), 9–36 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, E.S.K.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proc. 3rd Int’l Symp. on Requirements Engineering, pp. 226–235. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sc. of Comp. Programming 20(1-2), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ly, L.T., Knuplesch, D., Rinderle-Ma, S., Göser, K., Pfeifer, H., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: SeaFlows Toolset – Compliance Verification Made Easy for Process-Aware Information Systems. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Sølvberg, A.: Data and What They Refer to. In: Chen, P.P., Akoka, J., Kangassalu, H., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 1565, pp. 211–226. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd edn. MIT Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weske, M.: Business Process Management. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lohrmann, M., Reichert, M.: Formalizing concepts for efficacy-aware business process modeling. Technical Report UIB-2012-05, Databases and Information Systems Institute, Ulm University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lohrmann, M., Reichert, M. (2012). Efficacy-Aware Business Process Modeling. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7565. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33605-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33606-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics