Advertisement

Enhancing Crop Diversity and Livelihood Security in the Andes Through the Emergence of Agricultural Innovation Systems

Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

The need to increase agricultural production and productivity is taking place at the same time as changes in the global agricultural economy are providing farmers with new challenges and opportunities. Enhancing agricultural productivity in mountainous areas, such as the Andes, will require new extension approaches that support the emergence of agricultural innovation systems. This chapter explores the future of farming activities in the Andes. Based on research carried out in the region, it explores the feasibility of farmers’ maintaining crop diversity and strengthening their livelihood security in the face of new challenges and opportunities. The emphasis is on new approaches to extension service delivery that stimulate increased agricultural production, contribute to collective action and foster the emergence of agricultural innovation systems. These systems link a set of heterogeneous value chain actors in a dynamic process that depends on learning, feedback loops and iterative interactions that are decidedly non-linear. The viability of farming in the Andes will depend on an enabling policy environment that encourages public and private sector interventions that lead to the fostering of these agricultural innovation systems.

Keywords

Collective Action Innovation System Potato Variety Extension Modality Andean Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anandajayasekeram P, Davis KE, Workneh S (2007) Farmer field schools: an alternative to existing extension systems? Experience from Eastern and Southern Africa. J Int Agric Ext Educ 14(1):81–93Google Scholar
  2. Biggs SD (1988) Resource poor farmer participation in research: a synthesis of experiences from nine national agricultural research systems. OFCOR comparative study paper no. 3. ISNAR, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. Brush S (1991) Farmer conservation of new world crops: the case of Andean Potatoes. Diversity 7(1&2):75–79Google Scholar
  4. Cabero J, van Immerzeel W (2007) Building learning networks for small-scale farmers: Pachamama Raymi as an innovative knowledge management system. Knowl Manag Dev J 3(2):52–63Google Scholar
  5. Chapman R, Tripp R (2003) Changing incentives for agricultural extension—a review of provatised extension in practice. Agriculture research & extension network paper 132, Overseas Development Institute, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman R, Slaymaker T, Young J (2003) Livelihoods approaches to information and communication in support of rural poverty elimination and food security. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London 69 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Dandler J, Sage C (1985) What is happening to Andean potatoes? A view from the Grass-roots. Dev Dialogue 1:125–138Google Scholar
  8. Davis KE, Ekboir J, Spielman DJ (2008) Strengthening agricultural education and training in sub-Saharan Africa from an innovation systems perspective: a case study of Mozambique. J Agric Educ Ext 14(1):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de la Torre C (2004) Kamayoq: promotores campesinos de innovaciones tecnológicas. ITDG Latin America, LimaGoogle Scholar
  10. Delmer DP (2005) Agriculture in the developing world: connecting innovations in plant research to downstream applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(44):15739–15746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devaux A, Horton D, Velasco C, Thiele G, Lopez G, Bernet, T, Reinoso I, Ordinola, M. (2009) Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy 34:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erenstein O, Sayre K, Wall P, Dixon J, Hellin J (2008) Adapting no-tillage agriculture to the conditions of smallholder maize and wheat farmers in the tropics and sub-tropics. In: Goddard T, Zoebisch MA, Gan Y, Ellis W, Watson A, Sombatpanit S (eds) No-till farming systems, pp 253–278. World Association of Soil and Water Conservation special publication no. 3. Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruère G, Nagarajanm L, King O (2007) Collective action and marketing of underutilized plant species: the case of minor millets in Kolli Hills, Tamil Nadu, India. CAPRi working paper. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall A, Mytelka L, Oyeyinka B (2005) Innovation systems: implications for agricultural policy and practice. ILAC Brief 2. IPGRI, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Hellin J (2012) Agricultural extension, collective action and innovation systems: lessons on network brokering from Peru and Mexico. J Agric Educ Ext 18(2):141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hellin J, Dixon J (2008) Operationalizing participatory research and farmer-to-farmer extension: the Kamayoq in Peru. Dev Pract 1818(4&5):627–632. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713412875~db=all~tab=issueslist~branches=18 Google Scholar
  17. Hellin J, Higman S (2005) Crop diversity and livelihood security in the Andes. Dev Pract 15(2):165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellin J, Higman S, Keleman A (2010) Value chain co-ordination for agro-biodiversity conservation. In: Lockie S, Carpenter D (eds) Agriculture, biodiversity and markets: livelihoods and agroecology in comparative perspective. Earthscan, London, pp 213–228Google Scholar
  19. Klerkx L, Leeuwis C (2009) Shaping collective functions in privatized agricultural knowledge and information systems: the positioning and embedding of a network broker in the Dutch dairy sector’. J Agric Educ Ext 15(1):81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klerkx L, Hall A, Leeuwis C (2009) Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecol 8(5/6):409–438Google Scholar
  21. Markelova H, Meinzen-Dick R, Hellin J, Dohrn S (2009) Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy 34:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meinzen-Dick R, Di Gregorio M (2004) Collective action and property rights for sustainable development. 2020 Vision. Focus 11. Brief 1 of 16. IFPRI, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortiz O (2006) Evolution of agricultural extension and information dissemination in Peru: an historical perspective focusing on potato-related pest control. Agric Hum Values 23:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Repo-Carrasco R, Espinoza C, Jacobsen S-E (2001) Valor Nutricional y usos de la Quinua y de la Kañiwa. In: Jacobsen S-E, Mujica A, Portillo Z (eds) Memorias Primer Taller Internacional en Quinua: Recursos Genéticos y Sistemas de Produccción. Proyecto Quinua CIP-DANIDAGoogle Scholar
  25. Risi J (2001) ‘Producción de quinua en el Altiplano sur de Bolivia’, in Jacobsen, S-E., Mujica, A., and Portillo, Z. (eds.) Memorias Primer Taller Internacional en Quinua: Recursos Genéticos y Sistemas de Produccción, Proyecto Quinua CIP-DANIDAGoogle Scholar
  26. Rivera WM, Cary JW (1997) Privatizing agricultural extension. In: Swanson BE, Bentz RP, Sofranko AJ (eds) Improving agricultural extension—a reference manual. FAO, Rome, pp 203–211Google Scholar
  27. Spielman DJ, Ekboir J, Davis K, Ochieng CMO (2008) An innovation systems perspective on strengthening agricultural education and training in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric Syst 98:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sumberg J, Okali C, Reece D (2003) Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: theoretical considerations. Agric Syst 76:739–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tripp R (2001) Seed provision and agricultural development: the institutions of rural change. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, 182 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Umali-Deininger D (2007) Public and private agricultural extension: partners or rivals? World Bank Res Obs 12(2):203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waters-Bayer A, van Veldhuizen L, Wettasinha C, Wongtschowski M (2004) Developing partnerships to promote local innovation. J Agric Educ Ext 10(3):143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)MexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations