Advertisement

Directional Votes of Optical Flow Projections for Independent Motion Detection

  • László Czúni
  • Mónika Gál
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7594)

Abstract

In our paper we discuss some of the problems of camera independent motion dection and propose the use of a qualitative method based on the projections of the optical flow. By applying several projections of the optical flow and using a voting mechanism we can increase the performance of motion detection: the F-measure, examined on 20 artificial and real-life test videos, was increased with about 10-25% in general compared to the average performance of individual projections.

Keywords

Camera Independent Motion Detection Detectability Optical Flow Motion Analysis Corner Detection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bouguet, J.Y.: Pyramidal Implementation of the Lucas Kanade Feature Tracker Description of the algorithm. Intel Corporation Microprocessor Research Labs (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fejes, S., Davis, L.S.: Detection of independent motion using directional motion estimation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 78, 101–120 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foresti, G.L., Micheloni, C.: A robust feature tracker for active surveillance of outdoor scenes. Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis, 21–34 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proc. Alvey Vision Conf., pp. 147–151 (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Irani, M., Anandan, P.: A unified approach to moving object detection in 2D and 3D scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 577–588 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung, B., Sukhatme, G.S.: Detecting moving objects using a single camera on a mobile robot an outdoor environment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, pp. 980–987 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lucas, B.D., Kanade, T.: An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 674–679 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szolgay, D., Benois-Pineau, J., Megret, R., Gaestel, Y.: Detection of moving foreground objects in videos with strong camera motion. Pattern Analysis and Applications 14(3), 311–328 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ess, A., Leibe, B., Schindler, K., van Gool, L.: Moving Obstacle Detection in Highly Dynamic Scenes. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 56–63 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Czúni, L., Gál, M.: Independent Motion Detection in the Light of the Aperture Problem. Research Report, University of Pannonia (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proc. 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1150–1157 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L.: SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 110(3), 346–359 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • László Czúni
    • 1
  • Mónika Gál
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Information SystemsUniversity of PannoniaVeszprémHungary
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of PannoniaVeszprémHungary

Personalised recommendations