Skip to main content

A Curvature Tensor Distance for Mesh Visual Quality Assessment

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7594))

Abstract

This paper presents a new objective metric for assessing the visual difference between a reference or ‘perfect’ mesh and its distorted version. The proposed metric is based on the measurement of a distance between curvature tensors of the two triangle meshes under comparison. Unlike existing methods, our algorithm uses not only eigenvalues but also eigenvectors of the curvature tensor to derive a perceptually-oriented distance. Our metric also accounts for some important properties of the human visual system. Experimental results show good coherence between the proposed objective metric and subjective assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corsini, M., Larabi, M.C., Lavoué, G., Petřík, O., Váša, L., Wang, K.: Perceptual metrics for static and dynamic triangle meshes. In: Proc. of Eurographics State-of-the-Art Rep., pp. 135–157 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., Scopigno, R.: Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput. Graphics Forum 17(2), 167–174 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aspert, N., Santa-Cruz, D., Ebrahimi, T.: MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. In: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia & Expo., pp. 705–708 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karni, Z., Gotsman, C.: Spectral compression of mesh geometry. In: Proc. of ACM Siggraph, pp. 279–286 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corsini, M., Drelie Gelasca, E., Ebrahimi, T., Barni, M.: Watermarked 3-D mesh quality assessment. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia 9(2), 247–256 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bian, Z., Hu, S.M., Martin, R.R.: Evaluation for small visual difference between conforming meshes on strain field. Journal of Comput. Sci. and Technol. 24(1), 65–75 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lavoué, G., Drelie Gelasca, E., Dupont, F., Baskurt, A., Ebrahimi, T.: Perceptually driven 3D distance metrics with application to watermarking. In: Proc. of SPIE Electronic Imaging, pp. 63120L.1–63120L.12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. on Image Process 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavoué, G.: A multiscale metric for 3D mesh visual quality assessment. Comput. Graphics Forum 30(5), 1427–1437 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady, M., Ponce, J., Yuille, A.L., Asada, H.: Describing surfaces. Comput. Vision, Graphics, and Image Process 32(1), 1–28 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hertzmann, A., Zorin, D.: Illustrating smooth surfaces. In: Proc. of ACM Siggraph, pp. 517–526 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alliez, P., Cohen-Steiner, D., Devillers, O., Lévy, B., Desbrun, M.: Anisotropic polygonal remeshing. ACM Trans. on Graphics 22(3), 485–493 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen-Steiner, D., Morvan, J.M.: Restricted delaunay triangulations and normal cycle. In: Symp. on Computational Geometry, pp. 312–321 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alliez, P., Tayeb, S., Wormser, C.: 3D fast intersection and distance computation (AABB tree). In: CGAL User and Reference Manual (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Q., Wang, Z.: Reduced-reference image quality assessment using divisive normalization-based image representation. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. 3(2), 202–211 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Engeldrum, P.G.: Psychometric Scaling: A Toolkit for Imaging Systems Development. Imcotek Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lavoué, G.: A local roughness measure for 3D meshes and its application to visual masking. ACM Trans. on Appl. Perception 5(4), 21:1–21:23 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silva, S., Santos, B.S., Ferreira, C., Madeira, J.: A perceptual data repository for polygonal meshes. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. In: Visualization, pp. 207–212 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cho, J.W., Prost, R., Jung, H.Y.: An oblivious watermarking for 3-D polygonal meshes using distribution of vertex norms. IEEE Trans. on Signal Process. 55(1), 142–155 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, K., Lavoué, G., Denis, F., Baskurt, A.: Robust and blind mesh watermarking based on volume moments. Comput. & Graphics 35(1), 1–19 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Torkhani, F., Wang, K., Chassery, JM. (2012). A Curvature Tensor Distance for Mesh Visual Quality Assessment. In: Bolc, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Chmielewski, L.J., Wojciechowski, K. (eds) Computer Vision and Graphics. ICCVG 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7594. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33564-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33564-8_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33563-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33564-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics