Skip to main content

Assessing Regional Economic Performance: Regional Competition in Spain Under a Spatial Vector Autoregressive Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

After a wave of empirical literature on regional competition focused on issues related to regional convergence, work developed recently has tried to address some of the shortcomings of the previous literature, developing a series of alternative approaches that center their attention on the assessment of regional economic performance. These alternative methodologies embrace a complex set of space-time interactions that take into account that a single region’s economic performance affects and is affected by other regions. In this context, and as an original contribution of this chapter, a spatial vector autoregressive (SpVAR) model for the Spanish regions during the period 1955 –2009 is presented. The SpVAR model considers spatial as well temporal lags of the variables. The estimated SpVAR is used to calculate impulse responses that provide insights about the effects of shocks to relative regional productive capacity on different regions. The empirical results suggest that the existence of trade linkages have had different significant impacts on the production shares of the 17 Spanish regions, but competition between regional economies prevails.

JEL codes: C31, C33, J24, O18, R11

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, regional performance can be significantly affected through changes in intraregional input endowments and intersectoral relationships.

  2. 2.

    The stability of city sizes to substantial shocks were examined by different works (see, for example, Davis and Weinstein 2002 or Brakman et al. 2004), being the general conclusion that they remain stable (Combes et al. 2008). Nevertheless, the analysis of the stability of regional sizes to shocks within the system is a pending task.

  3. 3.

    The above-mentioned work uses data only from 1986 to 2007, but the main conclusions remain in our research.

  4. 4.

    This approach views the convergence process as a question about the evolution of the cross-section distribution of income, focusing the attention into the entire distribution and not in particular regions.

  5. 5.

    We assume that the original variables contain temporal unit roots and are therefore nonstationary. In this case, our SpVAR specification is estimated in first differences, and not levels, to avoid spurious regressions (Phillips and Moon 1999). To check for non-stationarity, unit roots tests were performed both at the individual and panel levels. Both types of tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of non-stationarity for all the variables. For the sake of brevity, we omit the details of this and other intermediate outputs. Complete results can be request from the authors.

  6. 6.

    Under different functional form assumptions (basically, icebergs costs and CES preferences; see, for example, Harrigan 2003 or Combes et al. 2008), it could be possible to generate a regional gravity equation where the share of regional income for a region is a function of an income-weighted average of the rest of regions. The production side of this gravity equation was provided by the monopolistic competition model (Helpman and Krugman 1985).

  7. 7.

    The temporal limitations of the Spanish regional databases prevented us from using information about other important variables, as human capital or infrastructure indicators.

  8. 8.

    To facilitate the interpretation of the impulse responses, the endogenous variables of the SpVAR models (first differences of local and external shares) have been multiplied by 100, so that the accumulated impulse responses provide the percentage change in the level of the respective variable.

References

  • Aiginger K, Davies SW (2004) Industrial specialization and geographic concentration: two sides of the same coin? Not for the European Union. J Appl Econ 7:231–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong H, Taylor J (2000) Regional economics and policy. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora V, Vamvakidis A (2005) Economic spillovers. Exploring the impact trading partners have on each other’s growth. Finance Develop 42:48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1991) Economic Growth in a Cross-section of Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2):407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RE, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano GIP, Robert-Nicoud F (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1991) Convergence across states and regions. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:107–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey P, Friedrich PP (2000a) Aspects of regional competition. In: Batey PWJ, Friedrich P (eds) Regional competition. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Batey PWJ, Friedrich P (eds) (2000b) Regional competition. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakman S, Garretsen H, Schramm M (2004) The strategic bombing of German cities during WWII and its impact on city growth. J Econ Geogr 4:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello R (2009a) Space, growth and development. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello R (2009b) Spatial spillovers and regional growth: a cognitive approach. Eur Plann Stud 17:639–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello R, Camagni R, Chizzolini B, Fratesi U (2008) Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P, Carbonaro G (1996) Urban economic growth in Europe. Urban Stud 33:1111–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P, Magrini S (2009) Growing urban GDP or attracting people? Different causes, different consequences. In: Karlsson C, Andersson AE, Stough RR, Cheshire PC (eds) New directions in regional economic development, advances in spatial science. Springer, Berlin, pp 291–315

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Combes PP, Mayer T, Thisse JF (2008) Economic geography: the integration of regions and nations. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura JR (2001) Regional convergence in the European Union from hypothesis to the actual trends. Annal Reg Sci 35:333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura JR (ed) (2010) Regional policy, economic growth and convergence. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR, Weinstein D (1999) Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation. Eur Econ Rev 43:379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR, Weinstein D (2002) Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 92:1269–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR, Weinstein D (2003) Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical assessment. J Int Eco 59:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bustos A, Cutanda A, Díaz A, Escribá FJ, Murgui MJ, Sanz MJ (2008) La BD.MORES en base 2000: Nuevas estimaciones y variables, D-2008–2002, Dirección General de Presupuestos, Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Fuente A (2010) Series anuales de algunos agregados económicos y demográficos regionales, 1955–2009, D-2010–2005, Dirección General de Presupuestos, Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees S, Di Mauro F, Pesaran MH, Smith LV (2007) Exploring the international linkages of the euro area: a global VAR analysis. J Appl Econometr 22:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2006) Spatial convergence. Pap Reg Sci 85:199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagiolo G (2010) The international-trade network: gravity equations and topological properties. J Econ Int Coordin 5:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser EJ (1998) Enterprise, external economies and economic development. J Plann Liter 12:283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich P (1987) Regional competition under stagnation. In: Friedrich P, van Rompuy P (eds) Fiscal decentralization. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp 84–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse JF (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlaschelli D, Loffredo M (2005) Structure and evolution of the world trade network. Physica A 355:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Yserte R, Mancha-Navarro T (2010) The Spanish regional puzzle: convergence, divergence and structural change. In: Regional policy, economic growth and convergence. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1995) Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. J Monet Econ 36:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaparanta P (1998) Regional concentration, trade, and welfare. Reg Sci Urban Econ 28:445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan J (2003) Specialization and the volume of trade: do the data obey the laws? In: Kwan Choi E, Harrigan J (eds) Handbook of international trade. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Massachussetts, pp 85–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman PR (1985) Market structure and foreign trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings JD, Vera R (2011) “The Economic Impact of the Recession on Metropolitan Areas”. Unpublished paper, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings GJD (2008) On some conundra in regional science. Annal Reg Sci 42:251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewings G, Sonis M, Cuello F, Mansouri F (1996) The role of regional interaction in regional growth competition and complementarity in the U.S. regional system. Aust J Reg Stud 2:133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbs J, Wacziarg R (2003) Stages of diversification. Am Econ Rev 93:63–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kali R, Reyes J (2007) The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration. J Int Bus Stud 38:595–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kancs D (2007) Does economic integration affect the structure of industries? Empirical evidence from the CEE. Econ Syst Res 19:73–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70:950–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR, Venables AJ (1995) Globalization and the inequality of nations. Quart J Econ 110:857–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llano C (2004) Economía espacial y sectorial: el comercio interregional en el contexto de un modelo Multirregional para la economía española. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda

    Google Scholar 

  • Llano C, Esteban A, Pérez J, Pulido A (2010) Opening the interregional trade “Black Box”: the C-intereg database for the Spanish economy (1995–2005). Int Reg Sci Rev 33:302–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Bazo E, Esther Vayá E, Mora AJ, Suriñach J (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Annal Reg Sci 33:343–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Rodríguez J, Faiña A (2007) Regional wage disparities in the European Union: what role for market access. Investig Reg 11:5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Márquez MA, Ramajo J, Hewings GJD (2006) Dynamic effects within a regional system: an empirical approach. Environ Plann A 38:711–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez MA, Ramajo J, Hewings GJD (2003) Regional interconnections and growth dynamics: the Spanish case. Aust J Reg Stud 9:5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Márquez MA, Ramajo J, Hewings GJD (2010) A spatio-temporal econometric model of regional growth in Spain. J Geogr Syst 12:207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez MA, Hewings GJD (2003) Geographical competition between regional economies: the case of Spain. Annal Reg Sci 37:559–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J, Dones M, Llano C (2008) An interregional impact analysis of the EU structural funds in Spain (1995–1999). Pap Reg Sci 88:509–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Schuermann T, Weiner SM (2004) Modelling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model. J Bus Econ Stat 22:129–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Moon H (1999) Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67:1011–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poot J (2000) Reflection on local and economy-wide effects of territorial competition. In: Batey PWJ, Friedrich P (eds) Regional competition. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 205–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah DT (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2:27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah DT (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40:1353–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramajo J, Márquez MA, Hewings GJD, Salinas MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions? Eur EconRev 52:551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos R, Suriñach J, Artís M (2010) Human capital spillovers, productivity and regional convergence in Spain. Pap Reg Sci 89:435–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding S, Venables AJ (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 62:53–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW (1973) Regional Growth Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy JR, Thill J-C (2004) Spatial interaction modelling. Pap Reg Sci 83:339–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin X (1996) The classical approach to convergence analysis. Econ J 106:1019–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman B W (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano A, Boguña M (2003) Topology of the world trade web. Phys Rev E 68:015101(R)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA, Zha T (1999) Error bands for impulse responses. Econometrica 67:1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge and appreciate the funding received from the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain through the project ECO2009-12506

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel A. Márquez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix includes a brief discussion about multivariate spatial vector autoregressive –SpVAR- models, containing both the general formulation of such models and an explanation on the main properties of this type of econometric specifications.

Spatial VARs are a special type of vector autoregressions (Sims 1980), which include spatial as well as temporal lags of the state variables. Contrary to standard VARs, that do not allows the joint modeling of dynamic spatio-temporal interdependencies within a group of connected local economies (regions or states, metropolitan areas or local districts), SpVAR models permit that endogenous variables can exhibit co-movements over time and also over space.

Let \( {{Y}_{{it}}} = ({{y}_{{1,it}}},{{y}_{{2,it}}}, \ldots, {{y}_{{G,it}}}) \) and \( {{X}_{{it}}} = ({{x}_{{1,it}}},{{x}_{{2,it}}}, \ldots, {{x}_{{K,it}}}) \) denote two \( G \times 1 \) and \( K \times 1 \) vectors of stationary endogenous and exogenous variables, respectively, recorded on the ith region (i = 1,2,…,N) at time t (t = 1,2,…,T ). A reduced-form SpVAR specification of order p for these data can be written as

$$ {{Z}_{{it}}} = {{\Gamma}_{{0i}}} + {{\Gamma}_{{1i}}}{{Z}_{{i,t - 1}}} + \ldots + {{\Gamma}_{{pi}}}{{Z}_{{i,t - p}}} + {{\Phi}_{{0i}}}t + {{\Phi}_{{1i}}}{{X}_{{i,t}}} + {{U}_{{it}}} $$

where \( {{Z}_{{it}}} = ({{Y}_{{it}}},Y_{{it}}^{*}) \); \( {{\Gamma}_{{ji}}} \) ( j = 0,1, …, p) and \( {{\Phi}_{{ji}}} \) ( j = 0,1) are matrices of coefficients to be estimated; \( {{U}_{{it}}} \) is a \( 2G \times 1 \) vector of non-autocorrelated reduced-form disturbances with mean zero and a nonsingular covariance matrix, \( {{\Sigma}_i} \); and \( Y_{{it}}^{*} = ({{I}_G} \otimes W){{Y}_t} \), with \( {{Y}_t} = ({{Y}_{{1t}}},{{Y}_{{2t}}}, \ldots, {{Y}_{{Nt}}}) \) and W being a row-standardized \( N \times N \) connectivity matrix with elements \( {{w}_{{ij}}} \) fixed over time satisfying \( {{w}_{{ii}}} = 0 \) and \( \sum\limits_{{j = 1}}^N {{{w}_{{ij}}}} = 1 \). The components of the spatial lagged dependent vector \( Y_{{it}}^{*} \) can be written as \( y_{{g,it}}^{*} = \sum\limits_{{j = 1}}^N {{{w}_{{ij}}}{{y}_{{g,jt}}}} \) and would be the weighted average of \( y_g \) in region i for regions s where \( {{w}_{{is}}} \ne 0 \).

It can be seen that spatially heterogeneous model dynamics is allowed because parameters are assumed to vary unrestrictedly at the level of the individual regions. Also, it can be observed that contemporaneous relations across the states variables are not modeled explicitly but captured by the elements of the covariance matrix \( {{\Sigma}_i} \).

Written in disaggregated form, the SpVAR model for region i takes the following form:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{lll} {{{Y}_{{it}}} = \Gamma_{{0i}}^1 + \Gamma_{{1i}}^1{{Y}_{{i,t - 1}}} + \Gamma_{{2i}}^1Y_{{i,t - 1}}^{*} + \ldots + \Phi_{{0i}}^1t + \Phi_{{1i}}^1{{X}_{{it}}} + U_{{it}}^1} \\{Y_{{it}}^{*} = \Gamma_{{0i}}^2 + \Gamma_{{1i}}^2{{Y}_{{i,t - 1}}} + \Gamma_{{2i}}^2Y_{{i,t - 1}}^{*} + \ldots + \Phi_{{0i}}^2t + \Phi_{{1i}}^2{{X}_{{it}}} + U_{{it}}^2} \\\end{array} } \right. $$

This expression implies that a spatial VAR can be seen as a spatial-extended VAR model for the vector \( {{Y}_{{it}}} \). For each endogenous variable \( y_m \) of this vector (m = 1,2,…,G), the SpVAR with N regions takes the form of the following system of equations (similar specification exists for the external variables \( y_m^{*} \)):

$$ \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} \begin{array}{lll} {y_{{m,1t}} = \varphi_{{01,m}}^1 + \sum\limits_{{g = 1}}^G{\varphi_{{11,m,g}}^1{{y}_{{g,1,t - 1}}}} + \sum\limits_{{g = 1}}^G{\varphi_{{21,m,g}}^1y_{{g,1,t - 1}}^{*}} + \ldots +\phi_{{01,m}}^1t}\cr \quad\quad\quad\quad+ \sum\limits_{{k = 1}}^K{\phi_{{11,m,k}}^1{{x}_{{k,1t}}}} + u_{{m,1t}}^1\end{array}\\ \begin{array}{lll} {y_{{m,2t}} = \varphi_{{02,m}}^1 + \sum\limits_{{g = 1}}^G {\varphi_{{12,m,g}}^1{{y}_{{g,2,t - 1}}}} + \sum\limits_{{g = 1}}^G {\varphi_{{22,m,g}}^1y_{{g,2,t - 1}}^{*}} + \ldots + \phi_{{02,m}}^1t} \cr \quad\quad\quad\quad+ \sum\limits_{{k = 1}}^K {\phi_{{12,m,k}}^1{{x}_{{k,2t}}}} + u_{{m,2t}}^1 \\ \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \vdots\end{array} \\ \begin{array}{lll} {y_{{m,Nt}} = \varphi_{{0N,m}}^1 + \sum\limits_{{g = 1}}^G {\varphi_{{1N,m,g}}^1{{y}_{{g,N,t - 1}}}} + \sum\limits_{{g = 1}}^G {\varphi_{{2N,m,g}}^1y_{{g,N,t - 1}}^{*}} + \ldots + \phi_{{0N,m}}^1t}\cr \quad\quad\quad\quad+ \sum\limits_{{k = 1}}^K {\phi_{{1N,m,k}}^1{{x}_{{k,Nt}}}} + u_{{m,Nt}}^1\\\end{array}\end{array}\right.$$

These reduced-form equations include the deterministic and exogenous variables, a set of temporally lagged variables (as in the traditional VARs), and a set of new temporally lagged spatial-lag variables.

SpVARs can be used to simulate the spatio-temporal dynamic effects of exogenous shocks within the system. Now, the impulse response analysis is more general than in the traditional VARs: an exogenous shock that occurs in a given region (or a group of them) at a point time can affect the economic conditions of other regions in the next periods. Therefore, shocks can propagate over time as well as across space, permitting the existence of spatial spillover effects: an exogenous shock in a region can spill over to the locations considered as neighbours (\( {{w}_{{is}}} \ne 0 \)).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Márquez, M.A., Ramajo, J., Hewings, G.J.D. (2013). Assessing Regional Economic Performance: Regional Competition in Spain Under a Spatial Vector Autoregressive Approach. In: Crescenzi, R., Percoco, M. (eds) Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33394-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33395-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics