Abstract
New organizational forms of highly complex and interdisciplinary cooperation like clusters of excellence constitute a new challenge in terms of cluster management and controlling. With regard to the requirements for adequate means of operationalization and evaluation, conventional performance measurement approaches and indicators are not sufficient, because they focus mostly on monetary aspects. Within the cluster of excellence “Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass” a performance measurement approach is implemented, focusing on quantitative as well as qualitative performance indicators. The approach bases on a Balanced Scorecard that is specified to the needs of interdisciplinary research cooperation. A mean of making various performance indicators measurable thus depicts a yearly survey among all hierarchical levels of cluster members to reflect the progress of the scientific output. The results are used as a basis of decision-making for the cluster management board. With regard to this, an operationalization and evaluation of performance indicators supports a continuous improvement process within the entire interdisciplinary cooperation. A further development of the measurement approach considers an integration of concepts like benchmarking and intellectual capital reporting to allow a more holistic form of scientific performance measurement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Amin and P. Cohendet. Architectures of knowledge. Firms, capabilities, and communities. Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
H. Ahn. Effektivitäts- und Effizienzsicherung. Controlling-Konzept und Balanced Scorecard. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, 2003.
Cluster of Excellence – Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass 2008. Technical report, 2008.
Cluster of Excellence – Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass 2009. Technical report, 2009.
DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 2006. Merkblatt Exzellenzcluster., 2006.
H. R. Friedag and W. Schmidt. Balanced Scorecard – Mehr als ein Kennzahlensystem. Haufe Verlag, Freiburg im Breisgau, 2002.
H. R. Friedag and W. Schmidt. Balanced Scorecard: Der aktuelle Stand nach 15 Jahren. In Der Controlling Berater – Informationen, Instrumente, Praxisberichte, volume 7, pp. 433–458. 2005.
R. Gleich. Das System des Performance Measurement. Theoretisches Grundkonzept, Entwicklungs- und Anwendungsstand. Vahlen Verlag, München, 2001.
M. Grüning. Performance Measurement-Systeme. Messung und Steuerung von Unternehmensleistung. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden, 2002.
W. Hölzl. Definition von Exzellenz für das Hochschulwesen. Technical Report 2006/368/A/3506, Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Wien, 2006.
C. Jansen. Scorecard für die Wissensmanagement-Performance in heterogenen Unternehmensnetzwerken. Doctoral thesis, Fortschritt-Bericht VDI Reihe 8: Meß- Steuerungs- und Regelungstechnik, Vol. No. 1024, 2003. Fortschritt-Bericht VDI Reihe: 8: Meß- Steuerungs- und Regelungstechnik.
W. Jetter. Performance Management. Zielvereinbarungen, Mitarbeitergespräche und leistungsabhängige Entlohnungssysteme. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, 2000.
N. Klingebiel. Performance Measurement. Grundlagen. Ansätze. Fallstudien. Gabler, Wiesbaden, 1999.
R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, (Jan-Feb):71–79, 1992.
N. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. Balanced Scorecard – Strategien erfolgreich umsetzen. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, 2001.
A. D. Neely, J. F. Mills, M. J. Gregory, and K. W. Platts. Performance measurement system design – a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4):80–116, 1995.
F. W. Raschke. Regionale Wettbewerbsvorteile. Identifikation, Analyse und Management von Clustern am Beispiel der Logistik im Rhein-Main-Gebiet. Doctoral thesis, European Business School Oestrich-Winkel, Wiesbaden, 2009.
J. Sauer. Förderung von Innovationen in heterogenen Forschungsnetzwerken und Evaluation am Beispiel des BMBF-Leitprojektes SENEKA. Doctoral thesis, Aachener Reihe Mensch und Technik, Issue 55, 2005.
R. Schmitt and T. Pfeifer. Qualitätsmanagement. Strategien – Methoden – Techniken. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 4 edition, 2010.
M. Sondermann, D. Simon, A.-M. Scholz, and S. Hornbostel. Die Exzellenzinitiative: Beobachtungen aus der Implementierungsphase. iFQ-Working paper no. 5, Bonn, 2008.
A. Töpfer. Das Management der Werttreiber. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung – Bereich Buch, 2000.
F. Welter, R. Vossen, A. Richert, and I. Isenhardt. Network Management for Clusters of Excellence: A Balanced-Scorecard Approach as a Performace Measurement Tool. The Business Review, 15(1):171–178, 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vossen, R., Welter, F., Leisten, I., Richert, A., Isenhardt, I. (2013). Making Scientific Performance Measurable - Experiences From a German Cluster of Excellence. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Hees, F., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2011/2012. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33389-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33389-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33388-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33389-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)