Abstract
In the present contribution it is shown in the context of large–eddy simulation (LES) and a Lagrangian treatment of the disperse phase that it is possible to considerably improve the particle statistics in turbulent channel and pipe flows by adopting a recently published wall roughness model for the solid phase. First, the model presented by Breuer etal.(Int J Multiphase Flow 43:157–175, 2012) is evaluated by means of the experiments conducted for a turbulent channel flow by Kussin(Experimentelle Studien zur Partikelbewegung und Turbulenzmodifikation in einem horizontalen Kanal bei unterschiedlichen Wandrauhigkeiten. Ph.D. thesis, Martin–Luther–Universität Halle–Wittenberg, Germany, 2004) and Kussin and Sommerfeld(Exp Fluids 33:143–159, 2002). As a second test case the experiments of Borèe and Caraman(Phys Fluids 17:055108–1–055108–9, 2005) carried out for a turbulent pipe flow were used. For both setups involving rough walls good agreement between experiment and simulation is achieved by considering the effect of the wall roughness on the particle motion. Especially the latter configuration is the precondition for an improved simulation of the complex particle–laden turbulent flow in a combustion chamber reported in the last issue (Breuer and Alletto, High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’11. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012) and in Alletto and Breuer(Int J Multiphase Flow 45: 70–90, 2012) and Breuer and Alletto(Int J Heat Fluid Flow 35:2–12, 2012).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M. Alletto and M. Breuer. One–way, two–way and four–way coupled LES predictions of a particle–laden turbulent flow at high mass loading downstream of a confined bluff body. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 45: 70–90, 2012.
J. Bardina, J. H. Ferziger, and W. C. Reynolds. Improved subgrid–scale models for large–eddy simulations. AIAA Paper, 80–1357, 1980.
M. Benson, T. Tanaka, and J. K. Eaton. Effects of wall roughness on particle velocities in a turbulent channel flow. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 127: 250–256, 2005.
J. Borèe and N. Caraman. Dilute bidispersed tube flow: Role of interclass collisions at increased loadings. Phys. Fluids, 17: 055108–1–055108–9, 2005.
J. Borée, T. Ishima, and I. Flour. The effects of mass loading and inter–particle collisions on the development of polydispersed two–phase flow downstream of a confined bluff body. J. Fluid Mech., 443: 129–165, 2001.
M. Breuer. Large–eddy simulation of the sub–critical flow past a circular cylinder: Numerical and modeling aspects. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 28(9): 1281–1302, 1998.
M. Breuer. Direkte Numerische Simulation und Large–Eddy Simulation turbulenter Strömungen auf Hochleistungsrechnern. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Berichte aus der Strömungstechnik. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2002. ISBN 3–8265–9958–6.
M. Breuer and M. Alletto. Two–phase flow predictions of the turbulent flow in a combustion chamber including particle–particle interactions. In J. Physics: Conference Series, volume 318, page 052002. IOP Publishing, 2011. 13th European Turbulence Conference (ETC13), Warsaw, Poland, Sept., 12–15, 2011.
M. Breuer and M. Alletto. Efficient simulation of particle–laden turbulent flows with high mass loadings using LES. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 35: 2–12, 2012.
M. Breuer and M. Alletto. Numerical simulation of particle–laden turbulent flows using LES. In W. E. Nagel, D. B. Kröner, and M. M. Resch, editors, High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’11, pages 337–352. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. ISBN 978-3-642-23868-7.
M. Breuer, M. Alletto, and F. Langfeldt. Sandgrain roughness model for rough walls within Eulerian–Lagrangian predictions of turbulent flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 43: 157–175, 2012.
M. Breuer, H. T. Baytekin, and E. A. Matida. Prediction of aerosol deposition in 90 degrees bends using LES and an efficient Lagrangian tracking method. J. Aerosol Science, 37(11): 1407–1428, 2006.
M. Breuer, P. Lammers, T. Zeiser, G. Hager, and G. Wellein. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over dimples - code optimization for nec sx-8 plus flow results. In W.E. Nagel, D. Kröner, and M. Resch, editors, High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’07, 10th Results and Review Workshop on High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Oct. 04–05, 2007, pages 303–318. Springer, Berlin, 2008.
M. Breuer, E. A. Matida, and A. Delgado. Prediction of aerosol drug deposition using an Eulerian–Lagrangian method based on LES. In Int. Conf. on Multiphase Flow, July 9–13, 2007. Leipzig, Germany, 2007.
C. T. Crowe, M. P. Sharma, and D. E. Stock. The Particle-Source-In-Cell (PSI-CELL) model for gas–droplet flows. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 99: 325–322, 1977.
C. T. Crowe, M. Sommerfeld, and Y. Tsuji. Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles. CRC Press, 1998.
S. F. Foerster, M. Y. Louge, H. Chang, and K. Allia. Measurements of the collision properties of small spheres. Phys. Fluids, 6(3): 1108–1115, 1994.
Th. Frank, K. P. Schade, and D. Petrak. Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of a gas–solid two–phase flow in a horizontal channel. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 19: 187–198, 1993.
I. E. Idelchik. Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance. Springer, second edition, 1986. ISBN 3–540–15962–2.
N. A. Konan, O. Kannengieser, and O. Simonin. Stochastic modeling of the multiple rebound effects for particle–rough wall collisions. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35: 933–945, 2009.
J. Kussin. Experimentelle Studien zur Partikelbewegung und Turbulenzmodifikation in einem horizontalen Kanal bei unterschiedlichen Wandrauhigkeiten. PhD thesis, Martin–Luther–Universität Halle–Wittenberg, Germany, 2004.
J. Kussin and M. Sommerfeld. Experimental studies on particle behaviour and turbulence modification in horizontal channel flow with different wall roughness. Exp. Fluids, 33: 143–159, 2002.
P. Lammers, G. Wellein, T. Zeiser, G. Hager, and M. Breuer. Have the vectors the continuing ability to parry the attack of the killer micros? In M. Resch, Th. Bönisch, K. Benkert, T. Furui, Y. Seo, and W. Bez, editors, High Performance Computing on Vector Systems, Proc. of the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart, March 17–18, 2005, pages 25–37. Springer, Berlin, 2006. ISBN 3-540-29124-5.
C. Marchioli, V. Armenio, and A. Soldati. Simple and accurate scheme for fluid velocity interpolation for Eulerian–Lagrangian computation of dispersed flow in 3D curvilinear grids. Computers & Fluids, 36: 1187–1198, 2007.
M. R. Maxey and J. J. Riley. Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a non–uniform flow. Phys. Fluids, 26: 883–889, 1983.
J. B. McLaughlin. Inertial migration of a small sphere in linear shear flows. J. Fluid Mech., 224: 261–274, 1991.
S. Obermair, C. Gutschi, J. Woisetschläger, and Staudinger G. Flow pattern and agglomeration in the dust outlet of a gas cyclone investigated by phase Doppler anemometry. Powder Technology, 156: 34–42, 2005.
B. Oesterlé and T. Bui Dinh. Experiments on the lift of a spinning sphere in a range of intermediate Reynolds numbers. Experiments Fluids, 19: 16–22, 1998.
J. Pozorski and S. V. Apte. Filtered particle tracking in isotropic turbulence and stochastic modeling of subgrid–scale dispersion. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35: 118–128, 2009.
S. I. Rubinow and J. B. Keller. The transverse force on a spinning sphere moving in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech., 11: 447–459, 1961.
J. Smagorinsky. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations, I, The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review, 91: 99–165, 1963.
M. Sommerfeld. Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas–particle flow in a horizontal channel: Part I. Particle transport. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 29: 675–699, 2003.
M. Sommerfeld and N. Huber. Experimental analysis and modelling of particle–wall collisions. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 25: 1457–1489, 1999.
M. Sommerfeld and J. Kussin. Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas–particle flow in a horizontal channel: Part II. Integral properties and validation. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 29: 701–718, 2003.
M. Sommerfeld and J. Kussin. Wall roughness effect on pneumatic conveying of spherical particles in a narrow horizontal channel. Powder Technology, 142: 180–192, 2004.
M. Sommerfeld, B. von Wachem, and R. Oliemans. Best practice guidelines for computational fluid dynamics of dispersed multiphase flows. In SIAMUF, Swedish Industrial Association for Multiphase Flows, ERCOFTAC, 2008. ISBN 978–91–633–3564–8.
K. D. Squires and O. Simonin. LES–DPS of the effect of wall roughness on dispersed–phase transport in particle–laden turbulent chanel flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 27: 619–626, 2006.
A. W. Vreman. Turbulence characteristics of particle–laden pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech., 584: 235–279, 2007.
Acknowledgements
The time–consuming computations were carried out on the national supercomputer NEC SX–9 at the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (grant no.: PARTICLE/pfs 12855), which is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Breuer, M., Alletto, M. (2013). Effect of Wall Roughness Seen by Particles in Turbulent Channel and Pipe Flows. In: Nagel, W., Kröner, D., Resch, M. (eds) High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ‘12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33374-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33374-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33373-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33374-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)