Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Designing Organizational Systems pp 63–81Cite as

Restructuring the Design Science Research Knowledge Base

A One-Cycle View of Design Science Research and its Consequences for Understanding Organizational Design Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 1))

Abstract

The contribution of this paper is twofold. We revisit the three-cycle procedural view of Design Science Research (DSR) as introduced by Hevner, and we propose a structuring mechanism for the DSR Knowledge Base (KB) and the problem/context specification that supports our revisited DSR procedure. Regarding the first contribution, we argue that each design cycle has rigor related as well as relevance related aspects. We therefore introduce a one-cycle view of DSR, comprised of alternating core activities design and evaluation. With every iteration, the understanding of the environment and the problem to be solved are enhanced. Additionally, every design iteration allows for revisiting the Knowledge Base in order to improve the problem solution. Concerning the second contribution, we propose to structure the DSR KB by means of two two-dimensional maps to support an efficient search for existing, reusable solution artifacts. One map concerns the application scope; the other one concerns the artifact character. Solution artifacts are then organized with regard to their type, generality, application domain and coverage. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed DSR KB structure using the domain of change projects in organizations as an exemplar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albani, A., Jan L.G. Dietz, & Verelst, J. (2011) Preface. In A. Albani, J. L. G. Dietz, & J. Verelst (Eds.), Advances in Enterprise Engineering V. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Österle, H. & Winter, R. (2003) Business engineering. In H. Österle & R. Winter, (Eds.)Business engineering - Auf dem Weg zum Unternehmen des Informationszeitalters. (pp. 3–19). Springer: Berlin etc.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz, J.L.G. (2006) Enterprise ontology: Theory and methodology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A Framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Group, T.O. (2012) ArchiMate 2.0 specification. The open group series: Van Haren Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer, M.& Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scheer, A.W., & Schneider, K, (2005) ARIS: Architecture of Integrated Information Systems. In P. Bernus, K. Mertins, & G. Schmidt (Eds.) Handbook on architectures of information systems (pp. 605–623). Berlin:Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sein, M., et al. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baskerville, R.L. (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(No. 2, June), 90–107.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boehm, B. (1986). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 11(4), 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Efeoglu, A., et al. (2012) Design science research in enterprise information systems. In Proceedings of the CONFENIS 2011 workshop, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bucher, T., et al. (2007) Situational method engineering: on the differentiation of “Context” and “Project Type”. In Situational method engineering: fundamentals and experiences. Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winter, R. (2011) Problem analysis for situational artefact construction in information systems. In A. Carugati & C. Rossignoli, (Eds.), Emerging themes in information systems and organization studies, Physica: Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winter, R. (2012) Construction of situational information systems management methods. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Albani, A., & Winter, R. (2012) A conceptual framework for Design and engineering in information systems. St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baumöl, U. (2005) Situative methodenkonstruktion für die organisationale Veränderung. St. Gallen: Universität St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baumöl, U. (2005) Strategic agility through situational method construction. In Proceedings of the European academy of management annual conference 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bucher, T. (2009) Ausrichtung der informationslogistik auf operative Prozesse: Entwicklung und evaluation einer situativen methode. Verlag: Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bucher, T., & Dinter, B. (2012). Situational method engineering to support process-oriented information logistics: identification of development situations. Journal of Database Management, 23(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fowler, M., & Kendall, S. (2000) UML Distilled: a brief guide to the standard object modeling language (2nd ed.) Object technology series. Wesley: Longman Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  23. OMG (2006) Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Specification. OMG.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Classification of reference models - a methodology and its applications. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, Müller-Friedberg-Strasse 8, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Robert Winter & Antonia Albani

Authors
  1. Robert Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonia Albani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Winter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Computer Information Systems, Georgia State University, Broad Street 35, Atlanta, 30302, Georgia, USA

    Richard Baskerville

  2. Università Cattolica, Milano, 20123, Italy

    Marco De Marco

  3. , CeRSI, LUISS Guido Carli, via Alberoni 7, Roma, 00198, Italy

    Paolo Spagnoletti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winter, R., Albani, A. (2013). Restructuring the Design Science Research Knowledge Base. In: Baskerville, R., De Marco, M., Spagnoletti, P. (eds) Designing Organizational Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation