Advertisement

Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A Matter of Access to Cooperation Systems

  • Michael Prilla
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7493)

Abstract

Today, people use cooperation systems with many different devices and interfaces. Popular systems such as Twitter illustrate this, as they can be used with many devices, provide numerous interfaces and can be integrated into many systems and web pages. As smaller cooperation systems might also benefit from such opportunities, this paper introduces the concept of ‘access’ to capture the different ways to interact with systems and argues that access should be regarded as a major factor for the design of cooperation systems. It understands access as vehicle to support users in carrying out their social tasks in a way that fits their needs, thus choosing from a variety of means to access systems. From an analysis of related work and of four cases of access design, it describes initial insights into influencing factors and design qualities of access.

Keywords

Cooperation System Design Quality Text Input Technology Usage Usage Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grudin, J.: CSCW: Time Passed, Tempest, and Time Past. Interactions, 38–40 (2010). Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, E.M., Harboe, G., Tullio, J., Novak, A., Massey, N., Metcalf, C.J., Romano, G.: Of social television comes home: a field study of communication choices and practices in tv-based text and voice chat. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 585–594. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zimmermann, G., Vanderheiden, G.: Accessible design and testing in the application development process: considerations for an integrated approach. Universal Access in the Information Society 7, 117–128 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B.A.: Acting with Technology. In: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giddens, A.: Elements of the Theory of Structuration. In: The Constitution of society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley, CA, pp. 1–40 (1984)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 11, 404–428 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dourish, P.: Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 229–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., Salas, E.: Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7, 297 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Löwgren, J.: Articulating the use qualities of digital designs. Aesthetic computing. pp. 383–403. The MIT Press (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., Siegel, M.: Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, pp. 201–210 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S.: Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. In: HICSS-32, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 10–19 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 475–487 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nylander, S., Bylund, M., Waern, A.: Ubiquitous service access through adapted user interfaces on multiple devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 9, 123–133 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prilla, M., Ritterskamp, C.: The Interplay of Web 2.0 and Collaboration Support Systems: Leveraging Synergies. In: Randall, D., Salembier, P. (eds.) From CSCW to Web 2.0: European Developments in Collaborative Design. Selected Papers from 02008. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loser, K.-U., Nolte, A., Prilla, M., Skrotzki, R., Herrmann, T.: A Drifting Ambient Assisted Living Project. In: Viscusi, G., Campagnolo, G.M., Curzi, Y. (eds.) Phenomenology, Organizational Politics and IT Design: The Social Study of Information Systems. IGI Global (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prilla, M., Degeling, M., Herrmann, T.: Collaborative Reflection at Work: Supporting Informal Learning at a Healthcare Workplace. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP 2012 (forthcoming, 2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herrmann, T., Nolte, A., Prilla, M.: The Integration of Awareness, Creativity Support and Collaborative Process Modeling in Colocated Meetings. International Journal on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (IJCSCW). Special Issue on Awareness (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prilla, M., Nolte, A.: Integrating Ordinary Users into Process Management: Towards Implementing Bottom-Up, People-Centric BPM. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) EMMSAD 2012 and BPMDS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 182–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Höök, K.: Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, pp. 226–235 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Prilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Information and Technology Management, IAWUniversity of BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations