Skip to main content

OWL Orthogonal Extension

  • Conference paper
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 128))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 551 Accesses

Abstract

It is critical for knowledge bases to capture the reality in direct and intuitive way. OWL ontology language was designed for this goal. In this paper we study the limitations of the OWL open world semantics for the task of knowledge capture and retrieval. We propose a new mechanism based on the closed world semantics that alleviates part of the limitations. Further we describe a system where both OWL and the new mechanisms interoperate together. Finally, we outline some immediate applications and further research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

  2. Ng, G.: Open vs. Closed world, Rules vs. Queries: Use cases from Industry. In: OWL: Experiences and Directions (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OMG Object Constraint Language, Version 2.3.1, http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.3.1

  4. Bārzdiņš, J., Bārzdiņš, G., Čerāns, K., Liepiņš, R., Sproģis, A.: UML Style Graphical Notation and Editor for OWL 2. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds.) BIR 2010. LNBIP, vol. 64, pp. 102–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. OWLGrEd – an Ontology Editor for Compact UML-style OWL Graphic Notation, http://owlgred.lumii.lv/

  6. Grimm, S., Motik, B.: Closed World Reasoning in the Semantic Web through Epistemic Operators. In: OWL: Experiences and Directions (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. OWL 2 Web Ontology Manchester Syntax, W3C Working Group Note (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/

  8. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Annotation_Properties

  9. RDF Primer, W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/

  10. SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Recommendation (January 15, 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  11. Stardog: The RDF database, http://stardog.com/

  12. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. J. Web Sem. 5(2), 51–53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The Programming Language Lua, http://www.lua.org/

  14. Ierusalimschy, R., Henrique de Figueiredo, L.: Passing a Language through the Eye of a Needle. Communications of the ACM 54(7), 38–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liepins, R.: lQuery: A Model Query and Transformation Library. Scientific Papers, vol. 770, pp. 27–45. University of Latvia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sirin, E., Bulka, B., Smith, M.: Terp: Syntax for OWL-friendly SPARQL Queries. In: Proceedings of OWLED (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission (May 21, 2004), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/

  18. Hitzler, P., Parsia, B.: Ontologies and rules. In: Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd edn., pp. 111–132. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barzdins, G., Rikacovs, S., Zviedris, M.: Graphical Query Language as SPARQL Frontend. In: Local Proceedings of 13th East-European Conference (ADBIS 2009), pp. 93–107. Riga Technical University, Riga (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barzdins, G., Liepins, E., Veilande, M., Zviedris, M.: Ontology Enabled Graphical Database Query Tool for End-Users. Selected Papers from DB&IS 2008. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 187, pp. 105–116. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heim, P., Ertl, T., Ziegler, J.: Facet Graphs: Complex Semantic Querying Made Easy. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6088, pp. 288–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liepiņš, R., Barzdins, J., Lace, L. (2012). OWL Orthogonal Extension. In: Aseeva, N., Babkin, E., Kozyrev, O. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33281-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33281-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33280-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33281-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics