Advertisement

The Effect of Predicting Expertise in Open Learner Modeling

  • Martin Hochmeister
  • Johannes Daxböck
  • Judy Kay
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7563)

Abstract

Learner’s self-awareness of the breadth and depth of their expertise is crucial for self-regulated learning. Further, of learners report self-knowledge assessments to teaching systems, this can be used to adapt teaching to them. These reasons make it valuable to enable learners to quickly and easily create such models and to improve them. Following the trend to open these models to learners, we present an interface for interactive open learner modeling using expertise predictions so that these assist learners in reflecting on their self-knowledge while building their models. We report study results showing that predictions (1) increase the size of learner models significantly, (2) lead to a larger spread in self-assessments and (3) influence learners’ motivation positively.

Keywords

Prediction Expertise Open Learner Model Self-assessment Metacognition Adaptive Educational Systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Apted, T., Kay, J., Lum, A., Uther, J.: Visualisation of ontological inferences for user control of personal web agents. In: IV 2003, pp. 306–311. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boud, D.: Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brusilovsky, P., Millán, E.: User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Educational Systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 3–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bull, S., Gardner, P.: Highlighting learning across a degree with an independent open learner model. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 275–282 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI:() Open Learner Modelling Framework. IJAIED 17(2), 89–120 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bull, S.: Supporting learning with open learner models. In: Proceedings of the 4th Hellenic Conference in Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens, Greece, pp. 47–61 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open Learner Models. Springer (to appear, 2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flavell, J.: Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist 34(10), 906–911 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hochmeister, M.: Spreading expertise scores in overlay learner models. In: Proceedings of CSEDU (to appear, 2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kay, J.: Lifelong learner modeling for lifelong personalized pervasive learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 1(4), 215–228 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kay, J., Li, L., Fekete, A.: Learner reflection in student self-assessment. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Australasian Conference on Computing Education, vol. 66, pp. 89–95. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kay, J., Lum, A.: Exploiting readily available web data for reflective student models. In: Proceedings of AIED 2005. Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 338–345. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleitman, S.: Metacognition in the Rationality Debate: self-confidence and its Calibration. VDM Verlag (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Student Preferences for Editing, Persuading, and Negotiating the Open Learner Model. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 481–490. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schraw, G., Crippen, K., Hartley, K.: Promoting self-regulation in science education. Research in Science Education 36(1), 111–139 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Hochmeister
    • 1
  • Johannes Daxböck
    • 1
  • Judy Kay
    • 2
  1. 1.Electronic Commerce GroupVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.School of Information TechnologiesUniversity of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations