Advertisement

Lost in Translation from Abstract Learning Design to ICT Implementation: A Study Using Moodle for CSCL

  • Juan Alberto Muñoz-Cristóbal
  • Luis Pablo Prieto
  • Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez
  • Iván M. Jorrín-Abellán
  • Yannis Dimitriadis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7563)

Abstract

In CSCL, going from teachers´ abstract learning design ideas to their deployment in VLEs through the life-cycle of CSCL scripts, typically implies a loss of information. It is relevant for TEL and learning design fields to assess to what extent this loss affects the pedagogical essence of the original idea. This paper presents a study wherein 37 teachers’ collaborative learning designs were deployed in Moodle with the support of a particular set of ICT tools throughout the different phases of CSCL scripts life-cycle. According to the data from the study, teachers considered that the resulting deployment of learning designs in Moodle was still valid to be used in real practice (even though some information is actually lost). This promising result provides initial evidence that may impulse further research efforts aimed at the ICT support of learning design practices in the technological context dominated by mainstream VLEs.

Keywords

CSCL Moodle learning design life-cycle VLE translation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner, P.A. (ed.) Three Worlds of CSCL. Can we Support CSCL?, pp. 61–91. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weinberger, A., Kollar, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Fischer, F.: Computer-supported collaboration scripts: Theory and practice of scripting CSCL. Perspectives of educational psychology and computer science. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., Jong, T.D., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S., Montandon, L. (eds.) Technology-Enhanced Learning. Principles and Products, pp. 155–174. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koper, R.: An Introduction to Learning Design. In: Koper, R., Tattersall, C. (eds.) Learning Design Modelling and Implementing Networkbased Education Training, vol. 2003, pp. 3–20. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernandez, E.D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Retalis, S.: CSCL Scripting Patterns: Hierarchical Relationships and Applicability. In: Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 388–392 (July 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Villasclaras-Fernandez, E.D., Hernandez-Gonzalo, J.A., Hernandez-Leo, D., Asensio-Perez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Martinez-Mones, A.: InstanceCollage: A Tool for the Particularization of Collaborative IMS-LD Scripts. Educational Technology & Society 12(4), 56–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vignollet, L., Ferraris, C., Martel, C., Burgos, D.: A Transversal Analysis of Different Learning Design Approaches. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (2) (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D.K., Synteta, P.: Virtual Learning Environments. In: Dimitracopoulou, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Hellenic Conference ”Information & Communication Technologies in Education”, Greece 2002, pp. 3–18. Kastaniotis Editions (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bower, M., Craft, B., Laurillard, D., Masterman, L.: Using the Learning Designer to develop a conceptual framework for linking learning design tools and systems. In: 6th International LAMS & Learning Design Conference, Sydney, Australia, LAMS Foundation (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E.D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Ruiz-Requies, I., Rubia-Avi, B.: COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society 9(1), 58–71 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Botturi, L., Derntl, M., Boot, E., Figl, K.: A Classification Framework for Educational Modeling Languages in Instructional Design. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), pp. 1216–1220. IEEE Press, Kerkrade (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conole, G.: Designing for Learning in an Open World. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol. 4. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium: IMS Learning Design Information Model (2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_infov1p0.html (accessed March 22, 2012)
  13. 13.
    Prieto, L.P., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A.: GLUE!-PS: A Multi-language Architecture and Data Model to Deploy TEL Designs to Multiple Learning Environments. In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp. 285–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: Computational representation of Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns using IMS Learning Design. Educational Technology & Society 8(4), 75–89 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martínez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., de la Fuente, P.: Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education 41(4), 353–368 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Stake, R.E., Martínez-Moné, A.: The needlework in evaluating a CSCL system: the evaluand oriented responsive evaluation model. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2009, vol. 1, pp. 68–72. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stake, R.E.: Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Stake, R.E.: Does Ubiquitous Learning Call for Ubiquitous Forms of Formal Evaluation? An Evaluand Oriented Responsive Evaluation Model. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal 1(3), 71–82 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., Dougiamas, M., Vogten, H., Koper, R.: A First Step Mapping IMS Learning Design and Moodle. Journal of Universal Computer Science (JUCS) 13(7), 924–931 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perez-Rodriguez, R., Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., Fontenla-Gonzalez, J., Anido-Rifon, L.: Orchestrating groupware in Engineering Education. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. F3D-1–F3D-6. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Alberto Muñoz-Cristóbal
    • 1
  • Luis Pablo Prieto
    • 1
  • Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez
    • 1
  • Iván M. Jorrín-Abellán
    • 1
  • Yannis Dimitriadis
    • 1
  1. 1.GSIC-EMIC GroupUniversity of ValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations