An Authoring Tool for Adaptive Digital Educational Games

  • Florian Mehm
  • Johannes Konert
  • Stefan Göbel
  • Ralf Steinmetz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7563)


Digital educational games, especially those equipped with adaptive features for reacting to individual characteristics of players, require heterogeneous teams. This increases costs incurred by coordination and communication overhead. Simultaneously, typical educational games have smaller budgets than normal entertainment games. In order to address this challenge, we present an overview of game development processes and map these processes into a concept for an authoring tool that unifies the different workflows and facilitates close collaboration in development teams. Using the tool, authors can create the structure of a game and fill it with content without relying on game programmers. For adding adaptivity to the game, the authoring tool features specific user support measures that assist the authors in the relatively novel field of creating non-linear, adaptive educational experiences. Evaluations with users recruited from actual user groups involved in game development shows the applicability of this process.


Digital Educational Game User Modeling Player Modeling Authoring Tool 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Albert, D., Lukas, J.: Knowledge spaces: theories, empirical research, and applications. Routledge (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartle, R.: Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research 1(1), 19 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellotti, F., et al.: Adaptive Experience Engine for Serious Games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 1(4), 264–280 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black, M., Hickey, R.J.: Maintaining the performance of a learned classifier under concept drift. Intelligent Data Analysis 3(6), 453–474 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bontchev, B., Vassileva, D.: Courseware Authoring for Adaptive E-learning. In: 2009 International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, pp. 176–180 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Developing adaptive educational hypermedia systems: From design models to authoring tools. Information Sciences, 377–409 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conlan, O., Wade, V.: Evaluation of APeLS – An Adaptive eLearning Service Based on the Multi-model, Metadata-Driven Approach. In: De Bra, P.M.E., Nejdl, W. (eds.) AH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3137, pp. 291–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foss, J.G.K., Cristea, A.I.: The Next Generation Authoring Adaptive Hypermedia: Using and Evaluating the MOT3. 0 and PEAL Tools. Complexity, 83–92 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Göbel, S., Wendel, V., Ritter, C., Steinmetz, R.: Personalized, Adaptive Digital Educational Games Using Narrative Game-Based Learning Objects. In: Zhang, X., Zhong, S., Pan, Z., Wong, K., Yun, R., et al. (eds.) Edutainment 2010. LNCS, vol. 6249, pp. 438–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harteveld, C.: Triadic Game Design. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hunicke, R., Chapman, V.: AI for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Games. Assessment, 91–96 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelly, H., et al.: How to build serious games. Communications of the ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D. (eds.): An Alien’s Guide to Multi-Adaptive Educational Computer Games. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knutov, E., et al.: AH 12 years later: a comprehensive survey of adaptive hypermedia methods and techniques. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 15(1), 5–38 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kunin, T.: The construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology 51(4), 823–824 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lopes, R., Bidarra, R.: Adaptivity Challenges in Games and Simulations: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3(2), 85–99 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.S.: Solving the Narrative Paradox in VEs – Lessons from RPGs. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 244–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maciuszek, D., Martens, A.: A Reference Architecture for Game-based Intelligent Tutoring. In: Felicia, P. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation through Educational Games Multidisciplinary Approaches. IGI Global (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehm, F., et al.: Authoring Environment for Story-based Digital Educational Games. In: Kickmeier-Rust, M.D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Open Workshop on Intelligent Personalization and Adaptation in Digital Educational Games, pp. 113–124 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mehm, F., et al.: Bat Cave: A Testing and Evaluation Platform for Digital Educational Games. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences International, Reading (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehm, F., et al.: Introducing Component-Based Templates into a Game Authoring Tool. In: Dimitris Gouscos, M.M. (ed.) 5th European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 395–403. Academic Conferences Limited, Reading (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moreno-Ger, P., et al.: Adaptive Units of Learning and Educational Videogames. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 05, 1–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peirce, N., et al.: Adaptive Educational Games: Providing Non-invasive Personalised Learning Experiences. In: 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, pp. 28–35 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rieber, L.P.: Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development 44(2), 43–58 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shute, V., Towle, B.: Adaptive E-Learning. Educational Psychologist 38(2), 105–114 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith, G., et al.: PCG-based game design: enabling new play experiences through procedural content generation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games PCGames 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thue, D., et al.: Learning Player Preferences to Inform Delayed Authoring. Psychology, 158–161 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Mehm
    • 1
  • Johannes Konert
    • 1
  • Stefan Göbel
    • 1
  • Ralf Steinmetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Multimedia Communications Lab (KOM)Technische Universität DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations