To Err Is Human, to Explain and Correct Is Divine: A Study of Interactive Erroneous Examples with Middle School Math Students
Erroneous examples are an instructional technique that hold promise to help children learn. In the study reported in this paper, sixth and seventh grade math students were presented with erroneous examples of decimal problems and were asked to explain and correct those examples. The problems were presented as interactive exercises on the Internet, with feedback provided on correctness of the student explanations and corrections. A second (control) group of students were given problems to solve, also with feedback on correctness. With over 100 students per condition, an erroneous example effect was found: students who worked with the interactive erroneous examples did significantly better than the problem solving students on a delayed posttest. While this finding is highly encouraging, our ultimate research question is this: how can erroneous examples be adaptively presented to students, targeted at their most deeply held misconceptions, to best leverage their effectiveness? This paper discusses how the results of the present study will lead us to an adaptive version of the erroneous examples material.
Keywordserroneous examples interactive problem solving adaptation of problems self-explanation decimals mathematics education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D.: In-service mathematics teachers’ views of errors in the classroom. In: International Symposium: Elementary Mathematics Teaching, Prague (2003)Google Scholar
- 2.Skinner, B.F.: The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century, New York (1938)Google Scholar
- 3.Borasi, R.: Reconceiving Mathematics Instruction: A Focus on Errors. Ablex Publishing Corporation (1996)Google Scholar
- 5.McLaren, B.M., Lim, S., Koedinger, K.R.: When and how often should worked examples be given to students? New results and a summary of the current state of research. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2176–2181. Cog. Sci. Society, Austin (2008)Google Scholar
- 6.Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K.: Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. In: Plass, J.L., Moreno, R., Brünken, R. (eds.) Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Leelawong, K., Biswas, G.: Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty’s Brain system. Int’l Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18(3), 181–208 (2008)Google Scholar
- 14.Tsovaltzi, D., Melis, E., McLaren, B.M., Meyer, A.-K., Dietrich, M., Goguadze, G.: Learning from Erroneous Examples: When and How Do Students Benefit from Them? In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 357–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Isotani, S., Adams, D., Mayer, R.E., Durkin, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., McLaren, B.M.: Can Erroneous Examples Help Middle-School Students Learn Decimals? In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp. 181–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Putt, I.J.: Preservice teachers ordering of decimal numbers: When more is smaller and less is larger! Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 17(3), 1–15 (1995)Google Scholar
- 21.Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.R.: A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(2), 105–154 (2009)Google Scholar
- 23.Goguadze, G., Sosnovsky, S., Isotani, S., McLaren, B.M.: Evaluating a bayesian student model of decimal misconceptions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2011), pp. 301–306 (2011)Google Scholar