Advertisement

Citizens’ Evaluation of an Online Argument Visualisation Platform for eParticipation

  • Eleni Panopoulou
  • Efpraxia Dalakiouridou
  • Efthimios Tambouris
  • Konstantinos Tarabanis
Conference paper
  • 929 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7444)

Abstract

Argument visualisation (AV) tools facilitate structured debates utilising elements such as issues, positions and arguments. In this way, AV tools seem promising for improving eParticipation e.g. by avoiding repetition and enhancing clarity in debates. In this paper we present and discuss citizens’ opinion on utilising an AV platform for eParticipation, specifically for discussing the emerging topic of environment and climate change. Results have been interesting; most users found the platform and topic interesting and understandable stating that they would use the platform again in the future and recommend it to other people. However, negative feedback has also been received, mostly in relation to things that frustrated users (e.g. the logic behind AV) and suggestions for improvement. As our evaluation is based on a mature AV tool and focuses on general aspects of such tools, we believe that results may be applicable to other AV platforms as well.

Keywords

Citizens climate change policy making argument visualisation 

References

  1. 1.
    Schyns, P., Koop, C.: Political Distrust and Social Capital in Europe and the USA. Social Indicators Research 96(1), 145–167 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission, Better Regulation – Simply explained, http://ec.europa.eu/governance/better_regulation/documents/brochure/br_brochure_en.pdf
  3. 3.
    European Commission, Smart Regulation in the European Union, COM, 543 final (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing? European Journal of ePractice No. European Journal of ePractice (7), 15–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DEMO-net Deliverable D5.2: eParticipation: The potential of new and emerging technologies (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shum, S.B.: Cohere: Towards web 2.0 argumentation. In: Hunter, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA). IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van den Braak, S.W., Vreeswijk, G.A.W.: AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 151–156 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkinson, K., Cartwright, D.: Political Engagement through Tools for Argumentation. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, pp. 116–127 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, D., Menda, Y.P., Price, D., Tambouris, E., Peristeras, V., Tarabanis, K.: Platforms To Facilitate Online Political Debates: The Wave Platform. In: Chappelet, J.L., Glassey, O., Janssen, M., Macintosh, A., Scholl, J., Tambouris, E., Wimmer, M.A. (eds.) Electronic Government and Electronic Participation: Joint Proceedings of Ongoing Research and Projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2010, pp. 303–310. Trauner Duck (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J.: Public Participation Methods: A framework for Evaluation. Science Technology Human Values 25(3) (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DEMO-net D13.3 DEMO-net booklet: eParticipation Evaluation and Impact (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MOMENTUM Deliverable D2.5: e-participation projects evaluation methodology (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loukis, E., Xenakis, A., Charalabidis, Y.: An evaluation framework for e-participation in parliaments. International Journal of Electronic Governance 3(1), 25–47 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henderson, M., Hogarth, F., Jeans, D.: Evaluation Framework for Assessing E-Democracy Policy. Encyclopedia of Digital Government (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whyte, A., Macintosh, A.: Analysis and evaluation of e-consultations. e-Service Journal 2(1), 9–34 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    European eParticipation Deliverable 4.1b Framework for eParticipation Good Practice (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleni Panopoulou
    • 1
  • Efpraxia Dalakiouridou
    • 1
  • Efthimios Tambouris
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Tarabanis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations