Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 129))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The act of voting is one of the most representative of Democracy, being widely recognized as a fundamental right of citizens. The method of voting has been the subject of many studies and improvements over time. The introduction of electronic voting or e-voting demands the fulfillment of several requirements in order to maintain the security levels of the paper ballot method and the degree of trust people place in the voting process. The ability to meet those requirements has been called into question by several authors. This exploratory research aims to identify what factors influence voters’ confidence in e-voting systems. A case study was conducted in an organization where such a system has been used in several elections. A total of 51 e-voters were interviewed. The factors that were found are presented and discussed, and proposals for future work are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dill, D.L., Schneier, B., Simons, B.: Voting and Technology: Who Gets to Count Your Vote? Communications of the ACM 46(8), 29–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Granneman, S.: Electronic Voting Debacle. Security (2003), http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/198

  3. Mercuri, R.: Electronic Vote Tabulation: Checks & Balances. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schneier, B.: Getting Out the Vote: Why is it so hard to run an honest election? San Francisco Chronicle, October 31 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schneier, B.: What’s wrong with electronic voting machines? OpenDemocracy (2004), http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-voting/article_2213.jsp

  6. Schneier, B.: Did Your Vote Get Counted? (2006), http://www.schneier.com/essay-133.html

  7. Antoniou, A., Korakas, C., Manolopoulos, C., Panagiotaki, A., Sofotassios, D., Spirakis, P., Stamatiou, Y.C.: A Trust-Centered Approach for Building E-Voting Systems. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 366–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Grove, J.: ACM Statement on Voting Systems. Communications of the ACM 7(10), 69–70 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Randell, B., Ryan, P.Y.A.: Voting Technologies and Trust. IEEE Security and Privacy 4(5), 50–56 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, B.: A Report on the Feasibility of Internet Voting, California Internet Voting Task Force, Sacramento, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McDaniel, P., Aviv, A., Balzarotti, D., Banks, G., Blaze, M., Butler, K.: EVEREST – Evaluation and Validation of Election-Related Equipment, Standards and Testing (2007), http://www.patrickmcdaniel.org/pubs/everest.pdf

  12. Jones, D.W.: Voting and Elections, The University of Iowa, USA (2001), http://www.divms.uiowa.edu/~jones/voting/

  13. ACE: Opportunities, risks and challenges of e-voting. ACE Project, The Electoral Knowledge Network (2001), http://aceproject.org/

  14. Antunes, P. (ed.): Voto Electrónico – Discussão técnica dos seus problemas e oportunidades, Edições Sílabo, Lisboa (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. CE: Legal, Operational and Technical Standards for e-Voting. Recommendation Rec. (2004) of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe Publishing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crane, R.E., Keller, A.M., Dechert, A., Cherlin, E., Mertz, D.: A Deeper Look: Rebutting Shamos on e-Voting (2005), http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-4/voting.html

  17. Cranor, L.F., Cytron, R.K.: Sensus: A Security-Conscious Electronic Polling System for the Internet. In: Proceedings of the Hawai International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frith, D.: E-voting security: hope or hype? Network Security 11, 14–16 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gritzalis, D.A.: Principles and requirements for a secure e-voting system. Computers & Security 21(6), 539–556 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall, J.L.: Policy Mechanisms for Increasing Transparency in Electronic Voting. PhD Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mercuri, R.: Questions for Voting System Vendors (2000), http://www.notablesoftware.com/checklists.html

  22. Monteiro, A., Soares, N., Oliveira, R.M., Antunes, P.: Sistemas Electrónicos de Votação. Technical Report, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neumann, P.G.: Security Criteria for Electronic Voting. In: Proceedings of the 16th National Computer Security Conference, Baltimore (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shamos, I.: Electronic Voting – Evaluating the Threat. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy, Burlingame, pp. 3.18–3.25 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strauss, C., Mertz, D., Dopp, K.: Electronic Voting System Best Practices (2005), http://electionmathematics.org/em-voting-systems/Best_Practices_US.pdf

  26. Neumann, G.: Special Issue: The problems and potentials of voting systems. Communications of the ACM 47(10) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. OpenRightsGroup: May 2007 Election Report – Findings of the Open Rights Group Election Observation Mission in Scotland an England (2007), http://www.openrightsgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/org_election_report.pdf

  28. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schlienger, T., Teufel, S.: Information Security Culture: The socio-cultural dimension in information security management. In: Ghonaimy, A., El-Hadidi, M.T., Aslan, H.K. (eds.) Proceedings of the IFIP TC11 International Conference on Information Security, pp. 191–202. Kluwer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brei, V.A., Rossi, C.A.V.: Confiança, valor percebido e lealdade em trocas relacionais de serviço: um estudo com usuários de Internet Banking no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 9, 145–168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mercuri, R.: A better ballot box? IEEE Spectrum 39(10), 46–50 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Palas Nogueira, J., de Sá-Soares, F. (2012). Trust in e-Voting Systems: A Case Study. In: Rahman, H., Mesquita, A., Ramos, I., Pernici, B. (eds) Knowledge and Technologies in Innovative Information Systems. MCIS 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33244-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33244-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33243-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33244-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics