Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Start-Up Location Decision and Regional Determinants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperation, Clusters, and Knowledge Transfer

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 1724 Accesses

Abstract

An important stream of literature in the past 20 years focuses on the impact of new firm formation, i.e., entrepreneurship, for the economic development of regions and nations. Addressing the importance of small business and new firm formation for economic growth (Audretsch 1995), a considerable outpouring of literature presented empirical evidence criticizing (Robson 1996) or confirming the “job generation process” theory and resulted in putting entrepreneurship at the forefront of research in an so-called “entrepreneurial” economy (Audretsch and Thurik 2000). The phenomenon of entrepreneurship is examined at various levels of analysis, such as individuals, firms, regions, or nations (Wennekers and Thurik 1999). Davidson and Wiklund (2001) argue that entrepreneurship research is dominated by micro-level analysis, mainly using the firm or the individual level of analysis. Reviewing nine peer-reviewed entrepreneurship journals, Chandler and Lyon (2001) find that only a small part of research designs focuses on the industry or macro-environment level. Davidson and Wiklund (2001) observe that the micro-level dominance increased over time, while the share of the aggregate level declined. Ucbasaran et al. (2001) call for more research on the existence of different and contrasting environmental conditions for entrepreneurship (see also Thurik 2009). But while the challenge of explaining how and why new firms emerge in regions or socioeconomic contexts raised much debate and resulted in an increasing body of literature, a certain number of gaps prevail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich H, Zimmer C (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton DL, Smilor RW (eds) The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Almus M, Egeln J, Engel D (1999) Determinanten regionaler unterschiede in der gründungshäufigkeit wissensintensiver dienstleister. Discussion paper no. 99-22. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000a) Geographical spillovers and university research: a spatial econometric perspective. Growth Change 31:501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000b) Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Pap Reg Sci 79:435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington C, Acs ZJ (2002) The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Reg Stud 36(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation. In: Nelson R (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 609–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Fritsch M (1994) The geography of firm birth in Germany. Reg Stud 28(4):359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2004a) Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 28(5):419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2004b) Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Reg Stud 38(8):949–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2005) Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth. Ann Reg Sci 39(3):457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The localization of entrepreneurship capital: evidence from Germany. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Thurik AR (2000) Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. J Evol Econ 10(1–2):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE, Warning S (2004) University spillovers: does the kind of science matter? Ind Innov 11(3):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Grilo I, Thurik AR (eds) (2007) The handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bade F-J, Nerlinger E (2000) The spatial distribution of new technology-based firms: empirical results for West Germany. Pap Reg Sci 79:155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi M (2001) Local development and embedded large firms. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 13:189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P (2009) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Ind Corporate Change 18(6):1193–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler GN, Lyon DW (2001) Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 25(4):101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC (1985) The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms. J Bus Venturing 1:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson P, Wiklund J (2001) Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 25(4):81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • De Propris L (2002) Types of innovation and inter-firm co-operation. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 14:337–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel D, Fier A (2000) Does R&D-infrastructure attract high-tech start-ups? Discussion paper no. 00-30. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS, Leighton LS (1990) Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Bus Econ 2(4):319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MP (2001) The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Ind Corporate Change 10(4):861–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Varga A (2003) Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research. Ann Reg Sci 37:303–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Gates G (2001) Technology and tolerance: the importance of diversity to high-technology growth. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Folta TB, Cooper AC, Baik Y (2006) Geographic cluster size and firm performance. J Bus Venturing 21:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti A, Vivarelli M (1994) An econometric test of the self-employment model: the case of Italy. Small Bus Econ 6(2):81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freytag A, Thurik AR (2007) Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. J Evol Econ 17:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M, Slavtchev V (2007) Universities and innovation in space. Ind Innov 14(2):201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey E, Heffernan P (2005) High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: the Cambridge case. Reg Stud 39(8):1127–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler MS (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr 3:75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenan N (1994) L’organisation du travail dans les PMI se distingue-t-elle de celle des grandes entreprises? Econ Stat 271/272:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guesnier B (1994) Regional variation in new firm formation in France. Reg Stud 28:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EL (1995) Entrepreneurial networks and organizational growth. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 19(4):7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffmann D, Quigley JM (2002) The role of universities in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: a Silicon Valley tale. Ann Reg Sci 36:403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques) (2000) L’économie française. Edition 2000–2001, Livre de Poche - Références. Hachette, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanisson B (1998) Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 10:297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P (2004) Differences in regional firm formation rates: A decomposition analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 28(4):431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Evans D, Thompson P (2009) The spatial dispersion of informal investment at a regional level: evidence from the UK. Eur Plan Stud 17(5):660–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangasharju A (2000) Regional variations in firm formation: panel and cross-section data evidence from Finland. Pap Reg Sci 79:355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble D, Walker S (1994) New firms, small firms and dead firms: spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Reg Stud 28:411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben J, Oerlemans LAG (2006) Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: a literature review. Int J Manag Rev 8(2):71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1998) Space: the final frontier. J Econ Perspect 12(2):161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasch F, Gundolf K, Kraus S (2007) The impact of unemployment on entrepreneurship: empirical evidence from France. Int J Bus Res VII(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch F, Robert F, Le Roy F (2013) Regional determinants of ICT entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 40(3):671–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Florida R, Acs Z (2004) Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation. Reg Stud 38(8):879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Prometheus Books, Amherst (Reprint)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger P (2000) The spatial concentration of knowledge. Some theoretical considerations. Erdkunde 54:352–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P (2003) Entrepreneurship in a modern network economy. Reg Stud 37(4):395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Poot J (1998) Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Ann Reg Sci 32:7–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman C, Bourke S, Murray JA (2005) The nature of managerial work in small growth-orientated businesses. Small Bus Econ 25(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamuro H, Kobayashi N (2006) The impact of regional factors on the start-up ratio in Japan. J Small Bus Manag 44(2):310–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1990) The comparative advantage of nations. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Bus Rev 76(6):77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Stern S (2001) Innovation: location matters. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 42:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds P, Storey DJ, Westhead P (1994) Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Reg Stud 28:443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson GB (1996) Unravelling the facts about job generation. Small Bus Econ 8(5):409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmude J (1994) Geförderte unternehmensgründungen in Baden-Württemberg. Eine analyse der regionalen unterschiede des existenzgründungsgeschehens am beispiel des eigenkapitalhilfe-programms (1979–1989), Erdkundliches Wissen, no. 114. Steiner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmie J (2002) Knowledge spillovers and reasons for the concentration of innovative SMEs. Urban Stud 39(5–6):885–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone D, Kitching J, Athayade R (2010) Ethnic diversity, entrepreneurship and competitiveness in a global city. Int Small Bus J 28(2):174–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face to face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4:351–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurik AR (2009) Entreprenomics: entrepreneurship, economic growth and policy. In: Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Strom R (eds) Entrepreneurship, growth and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 219–249

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thurik AR, Carree MA, van Stel A, Audretsch DB (2008) Does self-employment reduce unemployment? J Bus Venturing 23(6):673–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tödling F, Wanzenböck H (2003) Regional differences in structural characteristics of start-ups. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 15:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre A, Rallet A (2005) Proximity and localization. Reg Stud 39(1):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran D, Westhead P, Wright M (2001) The focus of entrepreneurial research: Contextual and process issues. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 25(4):57–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Varamäki E, Veslainen J (2003) Modelling different types of multi-lateral co-operation between SMEs. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 15:27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers S, Thurik AR (1999) Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Bus Econ 13(1):27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwan P van der, Verheul I, Thurik AR, Grilo I (2011) Entrepreneurial progress: climbing the entrepreneurial ladder in Europe and the US. Reg Stud. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.598504

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this paper have been read at Regensburg, Covilhã, Valencia. Frank Lasch, Frank Robert, and Frédéric Le Roy are members of the Labex Entrepreneurship, Montpellier, France. This “laboratory of excellence” is part of a French government fund recognizing and promoting performing research initiatives in human and natural sciences. Frank Lasch and Frank Robert are also involved in the chair Entrepreneurship & Innovation of the Labex initiative. The work on the present version benefited from Roy Thurik’s research visits to Montpellier.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center, Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier Business School, 2300 Avenue des Moulins, 34185, Montpellier, France

    Frank Lasch & Frank Robert

  2. ISEM/MRM-ERFI, University of Montpellier I, Espace Richter, Bât. E, Rue Vendémiaire, CS 19519, 34960, Montpellier, France

    Frédéric Le Roy

  3. Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Roy Thurik

Authors
  1. Frank Lasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frédéric Le Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roy Thurik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Lasch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Management and Economics, University of Beira interior, Estrada do Sineiro, pólo IV, Covilhã, 6200-209, Portugal

    João J.M. Ferreira

  2. , Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, Estrada do Sineiro, pólo IV, Covilhã, 6200-209, Portugal

    Mário Raposo

  3. , School of Social & Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, Tilburg, 5037 AB, Netherlands

    Roel Rutten

  4. , Economics and Regional Studies, University of Pécs, Rákóczi 80, Pécs, 7622, Hungary

    Attila Varga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lasch, F., Robert, F., Roy, F.L., Thurik, R. (2013). The Start-Up Location Decision and Regional Determinants. In: Ferreira, J., Raposo, M., Rutten, R., Varga, A. (eds) Cooperation, Clusters, and Knowledge Transfer. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33194-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33194-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33193-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33194-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation