Skip to main content

Event-Based Gateways: Open Questions and Inconsistencies

  • Conference paper
Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 125))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We discuss ambiguities and inconsistencies in the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) 2.0 standard regarding the semantics of event-based gateways, and instantiating event-based gateways in particular. We suggest to use instantiating parallel event-based gateways to model asynchronous process behaviour and to clarify the BPMN standard accordingly. We further discourage from any other use of instantiating event-based gateways, and call for a clarification of the semantics of event-based gateways in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN) 2.0 (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0 (accessed August 2011)

  2. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cervantes, A.A.: Representation of the behavior of business process models. Technical report, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Tartu, East Lansing, Michigan (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ye, J., Sun, S., Song, W., Wen, L.: Formal semantics of BPMN process models using YAWL. In: 2008 Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, IITA 2008, vol. 2, pp. 70–74. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J.: From business process models to process-oriented software systems. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 19(1), 2:1–2:37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weidlich, M., Decker, G., Großkopf, A., Weske, M.: BPEL to BPMN: The Myth of a Straight-Forward Mapping. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 265–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicolae, O., Cosulschi, M., Giurca, A., Wagner, G.: Towards a BPMN Semantics Using UML Models. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 585–596. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar, N.: Workflow Control-Flow Patterns: A Revised View. Technical report, BPMcenter.org (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Russell, N.: Pattern-Based Analysis of the Control-Flow Perspective of UML Activity Diagrams. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 63–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Milanović, M.V.: Modeling Rule-driven Service Oriented Architectures. Thesis, University of Belgrade (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zahoor, E.: Gouvernance de service: aspects sécurité et données. Thesis, Université Nancy II (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ter Hofstede, A.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adamns, M., Russell, N. (eds.): Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and its Support Environment. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Decker, G., Mendling, J.: Process instatiation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(9), 777–792 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Börger, E., Sörensen, O.: BPMN core modeling concepts: Inheritance-based execution semantics. In: Embley, D., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Handbook of Conceptual Modeling: Theory, Practice and Research Challenges. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN) FTF beta 1 for version 2.0 (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/Beta1/ (accessed June 2012)

  16. Börger, E., Stärk, R.: Abstract State Machines - A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Allweyer, T.: BPMN 2.0. Books on Demand, Norderstedt (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freund, J., Rücker, B., Henninger, T.: Praxishandbuch BPMN: Incl. BPMN 2.0. Hanser, München (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kossak, F., Illibauer, C., Geist, V. (2012). Event-Based Gateways: Open Questions and Inconsistencies. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Model and Notation. BPMN 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 125. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33155-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33155-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33154-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33155-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics