Skip to main content

A Generalization of Stålmarck’s Method

  • Conference paper
Book cover Static Analysis (SAS 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7460))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper gives an account of Stålmarck’s method for validity checking of propositional-logic formulas, and explains each of the key components in terms of concepts from the field of abstract interpretation. We then use these insights to present a framework for propositional-logic validity-checking algorithms that is parametrized by an abstract domain and operations on that domain. Stålmarck’s method is one instantiation of the framework; other instantiations lead to new decision procedures for propositional logic.

Supported, in part, by NSF under grants CCF-{0810053, 0904371}, by ONR under grants N00014-{09-1-0510, 10-M-0251, 11-C-0447}, by ARL under grant W911NF-09-1-0413, and by AFRL under grants FA9550-09-1-0279 and FA8650-10-C-7088. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Björk, M.: First order Stålmarck. J. Autom. Reasoning 42(1), 99–122 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, B., Gonthier, G.: Using Stålmarck’s Algorithm to Prove Inequalities. In: Lau, K.-K., Banach, R. (eds.) ICFEM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3785, pp. 330–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: POPL (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Systematic design of program analysis frameworks. In: POPL (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Silva, V., Haller, L., Kroening, D.: Satisfiability Solvers Are Static Analyzers. In: Miné, A., Schmidt, D. (eds.) SAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7460, pp. 317–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Silva, V., Haller, L., Kroening, D., Tautschnig, M.: Numeric Bounds Analysis with Conflict-Driven Learning. In: Flanagan, C., König, B. (eds.) TACAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7214, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Eén, N., Sjørensson, N.: The MiniSat solver (2006), minisat.se/MiniSat.html

  8. Granger, P.: Improving the Results of Static Analyses Programs by Local Decreasing Iteration (Extended Abstract). In: Shyamasundar, R. (ed.) FSTTCS 1992. LNCS, vol. 652, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison, J.: Stålmarck’s Algorithm as a HOL Derived Rule. In: von Wright, J., Grundy, J., Harrison, J. (eds.) TPHOLs 1996. LNCS, vol. 1125, pp. 221–234. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunz, W., Pradhan, D.: Recursive learning: A new implication technique for efficient solutions to CAD problems–test, verification, and optimization. IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems 13(9), 1143–1158 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marques Silva, J., Sakallah, K.: GRASP – a new search algorithm for satisfiability. In: ICCAD (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moskewicz, M., Madigan, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver. In: DAC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sheeran, M., Stålmarck, G.: A tutorial on Stålmarck’s proof procedure for propositional logic. FMSD 16(1), 23–58 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spence, I.: tts: A SAT-solver for small, difficult instances. Journal on Sat., Boolean Modeling and Computation (2008), Benchmarks http://www.cs.qub.ac.uk/~i.spence/sdsb

  15. Stålmarck, G.: A system for determining propositional logic theorems by applying values and rules to triplets that are generated from a formula (1989), Swedish Patent No. 467,076 (approved 1992); U.S. Patent No. 5,276,897 (approved 1994); European Patent No. 403,454 (approved 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stålmarck, G., Säflund, M.: Modeling and verifying systems and software in propositional logic. In: Int. Conf. on Safety of Computer Controls Systems (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thakur, A., Reps, T.: A generalization of Stålmarck’s method. TR 1699 (revised), CS Dept., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (June 2012), www.cs.wisc.edu/wpis/papers/tr1699r.pdf

  18. Thakur, A., Reps, T.: A Method for Symbolic Computation of Abstract Operations. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) CAV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 174–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thakur, A., Reps, T. (2012). A Generalization of Stålmarck’s Method. In: Miné, A., Schmidt, D. (eds) Static Analysis. SAS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7460. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33125-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33125-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33124-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33125-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics