Skip to main content

Fuzzy Rating vs. Fuzzy Conversion Scales: An Empirical Comparison through the MSE

  • Conference paper
Synergies of Soft Computing and Statistics for Intelligent Data Analysis

Abstract

The scale of fuzzy numbers have been used in the literature to measurement of many ratings/perceptions/valuations, expectations, and so on. Among the most common uses one can point out: the so-called ‘fuzzy rating’, which is based on a free fuzzy numbered response scheme, and the ‘fuzzy conversion’, which corresponds to the conversion of linguistic (often Likert-type) labels into fuzzy numbers. This paper aims to present an empirical comparison of the two scales. This comparison has been carried out by considering the following steps: fuzzy responses have been first freely simulated; these responses have been ‘Likertized’ in accordance with a five-point measurement and a plausible criterion; each of the five Likert class has been transformed into a fuzzy number (two fuzzification procedures will be examined); the mean squared error (MSE) has been employed to perform the comparison. On the basis of the simulations we will conclude that for most of the simulated samples the Aumann-type mean is more representative for the fuzzy rating than for the fuzzy conversion scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aydin, O., Pakdil, F.: Fuzzy SERVQUAL Analysis in Airline Services. Organizacija 41, 108–115 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertoluzza, C., Corral, N., Salas, A.: On a new class of distances between fuzzy numbers. Math. Soft. Comp. 2, 71–84 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco-Fernández, A., Casals, M.R., Colubi, A., Corral, N., García-Bárzana, M., Gil, M.A., González-Rodríguez, G., López, M.T., Lubiano, M.A., Montenegro, M., Ramos-Guajardo, A.B., de la Rosa de Sáa, S., Sinova, B.: Random fuzzy sets: a mathematical tool to develop statistical fuzzy data analysis. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bocklisch, F.A., Bocklisch, S.F., Krems, J.F.: How to Translate Words into Numbers? A Fuzzy Approach for the Numerical Translation of Verbal Probabilities. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. LNCS, vol. 6178, pp. 614–623. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bocklisch, F.A.: The vagueness of verbal probability and frequency expressions. Int. J. Adv. Comp. Sci. 1, 52–57 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chou, C.C., Liu, L.J., Huang, S.F., Yih, J.M., Han, T.C.: An evaluation of airline service quality using the fuzzy weighted SERVQUAL method. Appl. Soft. Comp. 11, 2117–2128 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Colubi, A., González-Rodríguez, G.: Triangular fuzzification of random variables and power of distribution tests: Empirical discussion. Comp. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 4742–4750 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. de la Rosa de Sáa, S., van Aelst, S.: Comparing the Representativeness of the 1-Norm Median for Likert and Free-Response Fuzzy Scales. In: Borgelt, C., Gil, M.Á., Sousa, J.M.C., Verleysen, M. (eds.) Towards Advanced Data Analysis. STUDFUZZ, vol. 285, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera, F.: Genetic fuzzy systems: taxonomy, current research trends and prospects. Evol. Intel. 1, 27–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hesketh, B., Griffin, B., Loh, V.: A future-oriented retirement transition adjustment framework. J. Vocat. Behav. 79, 303–314 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hesketh, B., Hesketh, T., Hansen, J.-I., Goranson, D.: Use of fuzzy variables in developing new scales from strong interest inventory. J. Couns. Psych. 42, 85–99 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hesketh, T., Hesketh, B.: Computerised fuzzy ratings: the concept of a fuzzy class. Behav. Res. Meth. Inst. Comp. 26, 272–277 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hesketh, T., Pryor, R.G.L., Hesketh, B.: An application of a computerised fuzzy graphic rating scale to the psychological measurement of individual differences. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 29, 21–35 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, H.-Y., Lee, Y.-C., Yen, T.-M.: Service quality gaps analysis based on fuzzy linguistic SERVQUAL with a case study in hospital out-patient services. The TQM J. 22, 499–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lalla, M., Facchinetti, G., Mastroleo, G.: Vagueness evaluation of the crisp output in a fuzzy inference system. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 159, 3297–3312 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Puri, M.L., Ralescu, D.A.: Fuzzy random variables. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 114, 409–422 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinova, B., de la Rosa de Sáa, S., Gil, M.A.: A generalized L 1-type metric between fuzzy numbers for an approach to central tendency of fuzzy data (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trutschnig, W., Lubiano, M.A., Lastra, J.: SAFD—An R Package for Statistical Analysis of Fuzzy Data. In: Borgelt, C., Gil, M.Á., Sousa, J.M.C., Verleysen, M. (eds.) Towards Advanced Data Analysis. STUDFUZZ, vol. 285, pp. 107–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Turksen, I.B., Willson, I.A.: A fuzzy set preference model for consumer choice. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 68, 253–266 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Part 1. Inform. Sci. 8, 199–249; Part 2. Inform. Sci. 8, 301–353; Part 3. Inform. Sci. 9, 43–80 (1975)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara de la Rosa de Sáa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de la Rosa de Sáa, S., Gil, M.Á., García, M.T.L., Lubiano, M.A. (2013). Fuzzy Rating vs. Fuzzy Conversion Scales: An Empirical Comparison through the MSE. In: Kruse, R., Berthold, M., Moewes, C., Gil, M., Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O. (eds) Synergies of Soft Computing and Statistics for Intelligent Data Analysis. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33042-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33042-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33041-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33042-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics