Skip to main content

Investigations into the Cognitive Conceptualization and Similarity Assessment of Spatial Scenes

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7478))

Abstract

Formally capturing spatial semantics is a challenging and still largely unsolved research endeavor. Qualitative spatial calculi such as RCC-8 and the 9-Intersection model have been employed to capture humans’ commonsense understanding of spatial relations, for instance, in information retrieval approaches. The bridge between commonsense and formal semantics of spatial relations is established using similarities which are, on a qualitative level, typically formalized using the notion of conceptual neighborhoods. While behavioral studies have been carried out on relations between two entities, both static and dynamic, similar experimental work on complex scenes involving three or more entities is still missing. We address this gap by reporting on three experiments on the category construction of spatial scenes involving three entities in three different semantic domains. To reveal the conceptualization of complex spatial scenes, we developed a number of analysis methods. Our results show clearly that (I) categorization of relations in static scenarios is less dependent on domain semantics than in dynamically changing scenarios, that (II) RCC-5 is preferred over RCC-8, and (III) that the complexity of a scene is broken down by selecting a main reference entity.

This research is funded by the National Science Foundation (#0924534) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, L.: AntConc (version 3.2.2). Waseda University, Tokyo (2011), http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/

  • Bateman, J.A., Hois, J., Ross, R., Tenbrink, T.: A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artificial Intelligence 174(14), 1027–1071 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, H.T., Egenhofer, M.J.: Similarity of spatial scenes. In: Kraak, M.J., Molenaar, M. (eds.) Seventh International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH 1996), Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 173–184 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A.G.: Conceptual neighborhood. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H. (eds.) Encyclopedia of GIS, p. 123. Springer, Boston (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A.G., Renz, J.: Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In: van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Handbook of Knowledge Representation, 1st edn., pp. 551–596. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.: Towards a classification of extra-geometric influences on the comprehension of spatial prepositions. In: Carlson, L.A., van der Zee, E. (eds.) Functional Features in Language and Space. Oxford University Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N.: The magical number 4 in short term memory. A reconsideration of storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 87–186 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dylla, F., Wallgrün, J.O.: Qualitative spatial reasoning with conceptual neighborhoods for agent control. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 48(1), 55–78 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer, M.J., Al-Taha, K.K.: Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships. In: Frank, A.U., Formentini, U., Campari, I. (eds.) GIS 1992. LNCS, vol. 639, pp. 196–219. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer, M.J., Franzosa, R.D.: Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2), 161–174 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freksa, C.: Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artificial Intelligence 54(1), 199–227 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, A.: Qualitative spatial change. Spatial information systems. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, M., Jansen-Osmann, P.: Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic processes whereas women prefer piecemeal ones? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(5) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel, A.: Spatial information theory meets spatial thinking - Is topology the Rosetta Stone of spatio-temporal cognition? Annals of the Association of American Geographers (67 manuscript pages) (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel, A., Li, R., Hardisty, F., Weaver, C.: Cognitive Invariants of Geographic Event Conceptualization: What Matters and What Refines? In: Fabrikant, S.I., Reichenbacher, T., van Kreveld, M., Schlieder, C. (eds.) GIScience 2010. LNCS, vol. 6292, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klippel, A., Li, R., Yang, J., Hardisty, F., Xu, S.: The Egenhofer-Cohn Hypothesis: Or, Topological Relativity? In: Raubal, M., Frank, A.U., Mark, D.M. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space - New Perspectives on Geographic Information Research (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Renz, J.: A Cognitive Assessment of Topological Spatial Relations: Results from an Empirical Investigation. In: Frank, A.U. (ed.) COSIT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1329, pp. 193–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kos, A.J., Psenicka, C.: Measuring cluster similarity across methods. Psychological Reports 86, 858–862 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, W.: An Image-Schematic Account of Spatial Categories. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 152–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Fonseca, F.: TDD: A comprehensive model for qualitative spatial similarity assessment. Spatial Cognition and Computation 6(1), 31–62 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D.M.: Spatial representation: A cognitive view. In: Maguire, D.J., Goodchild, M.F., Rhind, D.W., Longley, P.A. (eds.) Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications, 2nd edn., vol. 1, pp. 81–89 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D.M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Calibrating the meanings of spatial predi-cates from natural language: Line-region relations. In: Waugh, T.C., Healey, R.G. (eds.) Advances in GIS Research, pp. 538–553 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D.L., Wattenmaker, W.D., Hampson, S.E.: Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology 19(2) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadias, D., Delis, V.: Relation-based similarity. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on GIS, Las Vegas, pp. 1–4. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothos, E.M., Close, J.: One or two dimensions in spontaneous classifica-tion: A simplicity approach. Cognition (2), 581–602 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connections. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwering, A.: Semantic similarity of natural language spatial relations. In: Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour: Artificial and Ambient Intelligence. Symposium: Spatial Reasoning and Communication (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wallgrün, J.O., Yang, J., Klippel, A., Dylla, F. (2012). Investigations into the Cognitive Conceptualization and Similarity Assessment of Spatial Scenes. In: Xiao, N., Kwan, MP., Goodchild, M.F., Shekhar, S. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33023-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33024-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics