Abstract
Formally capturing spatial semantics is a challenging and still largely unsolved research endeavor. Qualitative spatial calculi such as RCC-8 and the 9-Intersection model have been employed to capture humans’ commonsense understanding of spatial relations, for instance, in information retrieval approaches. The bridge between commonsense and formal semantics of spatial relations is established using similarities which are, on a qualitative level, typically formalized using the notion of conceptual neighborhoods. While behavioral studies have been carried out on relations between two entities, both static and dynamic, similar experimental work on complex scenes involving three or more entities is still missing. We address this gap by reporting on three experiments on the category construction of spatial scenes involving three entities in three different semantic domains. To reveal the conceptualization of complex spatial scenes, we developed a number of analysis methods. Our results show clearly that (I) categorization of relations in static scenarios is less dependent on domain semantics than in dynamically changing scenarios, that (II) RCC-5 is preferred over RCC-8, and (III) that the complexity of a scene is broken down by selecting a main reference entity.
This research is funded by the National Science Foundation (#0924534) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anthony, L.: AntConc (version 3.2.2). Waseda University, Tokyo (2011), http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
Bateman, J.A., Hois, J., Ross, R., Tenbrink, T.: A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artificial Intelligence 174(14), 1027–1071 (2010)
Bruns, H.T., Egenhofer, M.J.: Similarity of spatial scenes. In: Kraak, M.J., Molenaar, M. (eds.) Seventh International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH 1996), Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 173–184 (1996)
Cohn, A.G.: Conceptual neighborhood. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H. (eds.) Encyclopedia of GIS, p. 123. Springer, Boston (2008)
Cohn, A.G., Renz, J.: Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In: van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Handbook of Knowledge Representation, 1st edn., pp. 551–596. Elsevier (2008)
Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.: Towards a classification of extra-geometric influences on the comprehension of spatial prepositions. In: Carlson, L.A., van der Zee, E. (eds.) Functional Features in Language and Space. Oxford University Press (2004)
Cowan, N.: The magical number 4 in short term memory. A reconsideration of storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 87–186 (2001)
Dylla, F., Wallgrün, J.O.: Qualitative spatial reasoning with conceptual neighborhoods for agent control. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 48(1), 55–78 (2007)
Egenhofer, M.J., Al-Taha, K.K.: Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships. In: Frank, A.U., Formentini, U., Campari, I. (eds.) GIS 1992. LNCS, vol. 639, pp. 196–219. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Egenhofer, M.J., Franzosa, R.D.: Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2), 161–174 (1991)
Freksa, C.: Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artificial Intelligence 54(1), 199–227 (1992)
Galton, A.: Qualitative spatial change. Spatial information systems. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2000)
Heil, M., Jansen-Osmann, P.: Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic processes whereas women prefer piecemeal ones? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(5) (2008)
Klippel, A.: Spatial information theory meets spatial thinking - Is topology the Rosetta Stone of spatio-temporal cognition? Annals of the Association of American Geographers (67 manuscript pages) (accepted)
Klippel, A., Li, R., Hardisty, F., Weaver, C.: Cognitive Invariants of Geographic Event Conceptualization: What Matters and What Refines? In: Fabrikant, S.I., Reichenbacher, T., van Kreveld, M., Schlieder, C. (eds.) GIScience 2010. LNCS, vol. 6292, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Klippel, A., Li, R., Yang, J., Hardisty, F., Xu, S.: The Egenhofer-Cohn Hypothesis: Or, Topological Relativity? In: Raubal, M., Frank, A.U., Mark, D.M. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space - New Perspectives on Geographic Information Research (in press)
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Renz, J.: A Cognitive Assessment of Topological Spatial Relations: Results from an Empirical Investigation. In: Frank, A.U. (ed.) COSIT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1329, pp. 193–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Kos, A.J., Psenicka, C.: Measuring cluster similarity across methods. Psychological Reports 86, 858–862 (2000)
Kuhn, W.: An Image-Schematic Account of Spatial Categories. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 152–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Li, B., Fonseca, F.: TDD: A comprehensive model for qualitative spatial similarity assessment. Spatial Cognition and Computation 6(1), 31–62 (2006)
Mark, D.M.: Spatial representation: A cognitive view. In: Maguire, D.J., Goodchild, M.F., Rhind, D.W., Longley, P.A. (eds.) Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications, 2nd edn., vol. 1, pp. 81–89 (1999)
Mark, D.M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Calibrating the meanings of spatial predi-cates from natural language: Line-region relations. In: Waugh, T.C., Healey, R.G. (eds.) Advances in GIS Research, pp. 538–553 (1994)
Medin, D.L., Wattenmaker, W.D., Hampson, S.E.: Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology 19(2) (1987)
Papadias, D., Delis, V.: Relation-based similarity. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on GIS, Las Vegas, pp. 1–4. ACM (1997)
Pothos, E.M., Close, J.: One or two dimensions in spontaneous classifica-tion: A simplicity approach. Cognition (2), 581–602 (2008)
Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connections. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)
Schwering, A.: Semantic similarity of natural language spatial relations. In: Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour: Artificial and Ambient Intelligence. Symposium: Spatial Reasoning and Communication (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wallgrün, J.O., Yang, J., Klippel, A., Dylla, F. (2012). Investigations into the Cognitive Conceptualization and Similarity Assessment of Spatial Scenes. In: Xiao, N., Kwan, MP., Goodchild, M.F., Shekhar, S. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33023-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33024-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)