Advertisement

Comparison of Realizations of the Terrestrial Reference Frame

  • C. MaEmail author
  • D. MacMillan
  • S. Bolotin
  • K. Le Bail
  • D. Gordon
  • J. Gipson
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 138)

Abstract

IGN and DGFI both generated realizations of the terrestrial reference frame under the auspices of the IERS from combination of the same space geodetic data. We compared the IGN and DGFI TRFs with a GSFC CALC/SOLVE TRF. WRMS position and velocity differences for the 40 most frequently observed sites were 2–3mm and 0.3–0.4mm/year. There was a scale difference of −0.39/−0.09ppb between the IGN/DGFI realizations and the GSFC solution. When we fixed positions and velocities to either the IGN or DGFI values in CALC/SOLVE solutions, the resulting EOP estimates were not significantly different from the estimates from a standard TRF solution.

Keywords

Radio wave technique Terrestrial reference frame Space geodesy 

References

  1. Allan DW (1966) Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proc IEEE 54:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan DW (1987) Time and frequency characterization, estimation and prediction of precision clocks and oscillators. IEEE Trans UFCC 34:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Métivier L (2010) ITRF combination: theoretical and practical considerations and lessons from ITRF2008. REFAG2010, IAG commission 1 symposium, Marne la ValléeGoogle Scholar
  4. Böckmann S, Artz T, Nothnagel A, Tesmer V (2010) VLBI terrestrial reference frame contributions to ITRF2008. J Geod 84:201–219. doi: 10.1007/s00190-009-0357-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Le Bail K (2006) Estimating the noise in space-geodetic positioning: the case of DORIS. J Geod 80:541–565. doi: 10.1007/s00190-006-0088-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ma C, Sauber J, Bell LJ, Clark TA, Gordon D, Himwich WE, Ryan JW (1990) Measurement of horizontal motions in Alaska using very long baseline interferometry. J Geophys Res 95(B13):21991–22011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Seitz M, Angermann D, Drewes H (2010) Accuracy assessment of ITRF2008D. REFAG2010, IAG commission 1 symposium, Marne la ValléeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. MacMillan
    • 2
  • S. Bolotin
    • 2
  • K. Le Bail
    • 2
  • D. Gordon
    • 2
  • J. Gipson
    • 2
  1. 1.NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  2. 2.NVI, Inc. and NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations