Advertisement

Some Features of TOPEX/POSEIDON Data Application in Gravimetry

  • O. Yu. VinogradovaEmail author
  • E. A. Spiridonov
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 138)

Abstract

The values of \( \Delta g \) corrections for vertical component of gravity produced by TOPEX/POSEIDON sea level variations were estimated. With this aim, the M. Molodensky boundary problem for deformation of elastic gravitating compressible sphere was solved. An equation connecting boundary conditions on the mantle surface and bottom was obtained. The values of load Love numbers for several models of upper layers of the Earth were calculated. We demonstrate that magnitude of \( \Delta g \) corrections appreciably depend from used models of the upper mantle and lithosphere structure.

Keywords

Load love numbers Load oceanic effect 

References

  1. Anderson DL (1989) Theory of the Earth. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK: 1989.001Google Scholar
  2. Larson AM (2004) S-wave velocity structure beneath the Kaapvaal Craton from surface-wave inversions compared with estimates from mantle xenoliths. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fullment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geosciences, p 70Google Scholar
  3. Molodensky MS (1953) Elastic tides, free nutation and some questions of Earth’s structure. Trudi Geophizicheskogo Instituta Ac Sci USSR N19(146):3–52Google Scholar
  4. Pertsev BP (1967) Estimation of the effect of marine tides on ground tides at points remote from the oceans, in book Zemnye prilivyi I Vnutrenneye Stroeniye Zemli, Moscow, IFZ, pp 10–22Google Scholar
  5. Pertsev BP (1976) Influence of the near field sea tides on the Earth tidal observations. Phizika Zemli N1:13–22Google Scholar
  6. Vinogradova O, Spiridonov E (2012) The comparative analysis of the oceanic corrections for gravity calculated for PREM and IASP91 models, Physika Zemli, N1 (in print)Google Scholar
  7. Wolfram HG, Rainer K, Xiaohui Y (2008) Upper mantle and lithospheric heterogeneities in central and eastern Europe as observed by teleseismic receiver functions. Geophys J Int 174:351–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Academy of ScienceInstitute for Physics of the EarthMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations