Advertisement

Combined Adjustment of GRACE and Geodetic Observations of Vertical Crustal Motion in the Great Lakes Region

  • E. RangelovaEmail author
  • M. G. Sideris
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 138)

Abstract

We combine GRACE-derived rates of vertical crustal motion, joint water gauge and satellite altimetry and GPS vertical velocities in the Great Lakes region. The combined vertical motion model is realized via a least-squares adjustment procedure, including variance-component estimation and robust outlier detection. This is necessary to ensure reliable estimates of the relative errors in the least-squares adjustment (via re-scaling of data variance-covariance matrices) and to ensure that the vertical motion model is not distorted by erroneous data. The combined vertical motion model shows a subsidence of 1–2 mm/year along the southern shores and an uplift of 3–4 mm/year along the northern shores generally consistent with the models of postglacial rebound in North America.

Keywords

Vertical crustal motion Postglacial rebound GRACE Great lakes Robust least-squares 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. W. van der Wal for providing the output of the postglacial rebound model simulations. The anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for their helpful comments. Financial support is provided by the GEOIDE NCE and NSERC to the second author.

References

  1. Braun A, Kuo CY, Shum CK, Wu P, van der Wal W, Fotopoulos G (2008) Glacial isostatic adjustment at the Laurentide ice sheet margin: models and observations in the Great Lakes region. J Geodyn 46(3–5):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dollinger MB, Staudte RG (1991) Influence functions of iteratively reweighted least squares estimators. J Am Stat Assoc 86(415):709–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hekimoglu S, Berber M (2003) Effectiveness of robust methods in heterogeneous linear models. J Geod 76:706–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuo CY, Shum CK, Braun A, Cheng KC, Yi Y (2008) Vertical motion determined by using satellite altimetry and tide gauges. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 19(1–2):21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. NGS (2008) The national geodetic survey ten-year plan: mission, vision, and strategy 2008–2018. Silver Spring, MD, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service. http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/INFO/NGS10yearplan.pdf
  6. Rangelova E, Fotopoulos G, Sideris MG (2009a) A dynamic reference surface for heights in Canada. Geomatica 63(4):333–340Google Scholar
  7. Rangelova E, Fotopoulos G, Sideris MG (2009b) On the use of iterative re-weighting least-squares and outlier detection for empirically modelling rates of vertical displacement. J Geodesy 83:523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rodell M et al (2004) The global land data assimilation system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85(3):381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rousseeuw PJ, Croux C (1993) Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. J Am Stat Assoc 88(424):1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sella GF, Stein S, Dixon TH, Craymer M, James TS, Mazzotti S, Dokka RK (2007) Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in “stable” North America with GPS. Geophys Res Lett 34:L02306. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Swenson S, Wahr J (2006) Post-processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data. Geophys Res Lett 33. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025285
  12. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09607. doi: 10.1029/2004GL019920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van der Wal W, Schotman HHA, Vermeersen LLA (2004) Geoid heights due to a crustal low viscosity zone in glacial isostatic adjustment modeling: a sensitivity analysis. GOCE Geophys Res Lett 31:L05608. doi: 10.1029/2003GL019139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Véronneau M, Héroux P (2007) Canadian height reference system modernization: rational, status and plans. Report Natural Resources of CanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. Wahr J, Wingham D, Bentley C (2000) A method of combining ICESat and GRACE satellite data to constrain Antarctic mass balance. J Geophys Res 105(B7):16,279–16,294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang Y (1994) Robust estimation for dependent observations. Manuscr Geod 19:10–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geomatics Engineering, Schulich School of EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations