Advertisement

Comparison of Latest Global and Regional Gravimetric Geoid Models with GPS/Leveling Geoidal Undulations Over Japan

  • Y. KuroishiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 138)

Abstract

The success of the dedicated gravity satellite missions CHAMP and GRACE has enabled global geoid determination at unprecedented accuracy and has stimulated study on geoid modeling at a very high-resolution on a global scale as well as for local improvement. The paper first describes the latest determination of a gravimetric geoid model for Japan, obtained by combining a GRACE-derived global geopotential model, altimetry-derived ocean gravity model and local surface gravity measurements on land and at sea. Then, a comparison of the model is made with EGM2008 and GPS/leveling geoidal undulations over four main islands of Japan. Third, we determine sea surface dynamic heights around Japan from a combination of a regional geoid model, tidal records and GPS/leveling data at the coast and on isolated islands and compare them with an oceanographic model.

Keywords

Gravimetric geoid GPS/leveling geoidal undulations GRACE Comparison 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The global high-resolution geopotential model, EGM2008, and its handling software are made available by the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. The Regional Delayed Mode Data Base used is provided by the Japan Oceanographic Data Center. The figures are created by GMT (Wessel and Smith 1998). The author’s thanks are extended to the institutes and the researchers. The author is also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Andersen OB, Knudsen K, Trimmer R (2005) Improved high resolution altimetric gravity field mapping (KMS2002 Global Marine Gravity Field). In: Sanso F (ed) A Window on the future of geodesy: Proceedings IUGG 23rd general assembly, 2003, IAG symposium, vol 128. Springer, Sapporo, Japan, pp 326–331Google Scholar
  2. Ekman M (1989) Impacts on geodynamic phenomena on systems for height and gravity. Bull Geod 63:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haagmans R, de Min E, van Gelderen M (1993) Fast evaluation of convolution integrals on the sphere using 1D FFT and a comparison with existing methods of stokes’ integral. Manuscr Geod 18:227–241Google Scholar
  4. Kuragano T, Shibata A (1997) Sea surface dynamic height of the Pacific Ocean derived from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data: calculation method and accuracy. J Oceanogr 53:585–599Google Scholar
  5. Kuroishi Y (2009) Improved geoid model determination for Japan from GRACE and a regional gravity field model. Earth Planets Space 61:807–813Google Scholar
  6. Kuroishi Y, Keller W (2005) Wavelet approach to improvement of gravity field-geoid modeling for Japan. J Geophys Res 110:B03402. doi: 10.1029/2004JB003371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuroishi Y, Ando H, Fukuda Y (2002) A new hybrid geoid model for Japan, GSIGEO2000. J Geod 76:428–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lemoine FG, Smith DE, Kunz L, Smith R, Pavlis EC, Pavlis NK, Klosko SM, Chinn DS, Torrence MH, Williamson RG, Cox CM, Rachlin KE, Wang YM, Kenyon SC, Salman R, Trimmer R, Rapp RH, Nerem RS (1997) The development of the NASA GSFC and NIMA joint geopotential model. In: Segawa J et al. (eds) Geoid and Marine Geodesy, Sep 30–Oct, 5 1996, IAG symposium, vol 117. Springer, Tokyo, Japan, pp 461–469Google Scholar
  9. McCarthy DD (2003) IERS conventions (2003). IERS technical note 32Google Scholar
  10. Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An Earth gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM2008. Presentation given at the 2008 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, 13–18 April 2008Google Scholar
  11. Tapley B, Ries J, Bettadpur S, Chambers D, Cheng M, Condi F, Gunter B, Kang A, Nagel P, Pastor R, Pekker T, Poole S, Wang F (2005) GGM02C – an improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. J Geod 79. doi: 10.1007/s00190-005-0480-z
  12. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79(47):579CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geospatial Information Authority of JapanTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations