Advertisement

Why Combining at the Observation Level?

  • D. GambisEmail author
  • J. Y. Richard
  • R. Biancale
  • C. Bizouard
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 138)

Abstract

Space geodetic techniques have different strengths and weaknesses for recovering geodetic parameters which makes their combination useful. However they may have some systematic behaviour which can be detected and removed at the observation level. In order to review the interest in combining techniques at this level, a Working Group was set up in the course of 2009 in the frame of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS). A major task of the WG COL is to study methods and advantages of combining space geodetic techniques (DORIS, GNSS, SLR, VLBI), searching for an optimal strategy to solve for geodetic parameters. The first action of the Working Group was to organize an inter-comparison benchmark campaign to serve as a test. The period chosen is from August 10 to August 30, 2008. It includes the intensive CONT08 VLBI period.

The combination analyses are based on weekly (or daily for VLBI) combined SINEX files which contain normal equations of station coordinates, Earth Orientation Parameters from all space geodetic techniques, quasar coordinates for the VLBI technique and troposphere parameters for all techniques except SLR. The objectives of the present paper are twofold: first give an overview of the method, present the objectives and strategy of the newly born working group COL; second to present some preliminary results obtained by the Groupe de Recherche en Géodésie Spatiale (GRGS) for Earth orientation parameters.

Keywords

Geodetic space techniques Combination at the observation level 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors were supported by the CNES under a specific grant. We thank S. Loyer, F. Deleflie, L. Soudarin, H. Capdeville and J.M. Lemoine for their contributions at various levels. ECMWF data used in this study have been obtained from the ECMWF Data Server. We thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments that helped to improve the paper.

References

  1. Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Legrand J, Garayt B, Boucher C (2007) ITRF2005: a new release of the international terrestrial reference frame based on time series of station positions and Earth orientation parameters. J Geophys Res 112:B09401. doi: 10.1029/2007JB004949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angermann D, Drewes H, Krügel M, Meisel B, Gerstl M, Kelm R, Müller H, Seemüller W, Tesmer V (2004) ITRS combination center at DGFI: a terrestrial reference frame realization 2003. In: Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe B, No. 313, München, ISBN 3769685938Google Scholar
  3. Berger C, Biancale R, Ill M, Barlier F (1998) Improvement of the empirical thermospheric model DTM94, a comparative review of various temporal variations and prospects in space geodesy applications. J Geodesy 72(3):161–178. doi: 10.1007/s001900050158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biancale R, Bode A (2002) Mean annual and seasonal atmospheric tide models based on 3-hourly and 6-hourly ECMWF surface pressure data, GFZ scientific technical report STR05/XXGoogle Scholar
  5. Biancale R, Lemoine JM, Balmino G, Loyer S, Bruinsma S, Perosanz F, Marty JC, Gégout P (2005) 3 years of decadal geoid variations from GRACE and LAGEOS data, CD-ROM, CNES/GRGS productGoogle Scholar
  6. Bizouard C, Gambis D (2009) The combined solution C04 for Earth orientation parameters consistent with international terrestrial reference frame 2005. In: Drewes H (ed) International association of geodesy symposia series, vol 134. Geodetic reference frames, Munich, 9–14 Oct 2006. Springer, Berlin, 2009. ISBN: 978-3-642-00859-7, pp 265–270, doi:  10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_41
  7. Bourda G, Charlot P, Biancale R (2007) GINS: a new tool for VLBI Geodesy and Astrometry. In: Bouvier J, Chalabaev A, Charbonnel C (eds) SF2A-2007: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the French society of astronomy and astrophysics held in Grenoble, France, 2–6 July 2007, p 82Google Scholar
  8. Brankovic C, Van Maanen J (1985) The ECMWF climate system, ECMWF Technical memorandum no. 109, 51ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrere L, Lyard F (2003) Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing – comparisons with observations. Geophys Res Lett 30:1275. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IERS Conventions (2003) McCarthy DD, Petit G (eds). In: IERS Technical Note 32. Chapter 10.2, Frankfurt am Main, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, 127pp. ISBN 3-89888-884-3Google Scholar
  11. Coulot D, Berio P, Biancale R, Loyer S, Soudarin L, Gontier A-M (2007) Toward a direct combination of space-geodetic techniques at the measurement level: methodology and main issues. J Geophys Res 112:B5. doi: 10.1029/2006JB004336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2007) Bernese GPS software version 5.0. Astronomical Institute, University of Berne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Fey A, Gordon D, Jacobs CS (eds) (2009) The second realization of the international celestial reference frame by very long baseline interferometry, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, IERS Technical Note 35Google Scholar
  14. Gambis D (2004) Monitoring Earth orientation at the IERS using space-geodetic observations. J Geodesy 78(4–5):295–303. doi: 10.1007/s00190-004-0394-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambis D, Biancale R, Carlucci T, Lemoine JM, Marty JC, Bourda G, Charlot P, Loyer S, Lalanne L, Soudarin L (2009) Combination of Earth orientation parameters and terrestrial frame at the observation level. Springer Verlag series, Series international association of geodesy symposia, vol 134, Drewes (ed), pp 3–9, doi:  10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_1
  16. Gerstl M, Kelm R, Müller H, Ehrnsperger W (2001) DOGS CS Kombination und Lösung großer Gleichungssysteme. Manual VIII für DOGS Version 4.05. Internal report. DGFI, MunichGoogle Scholar
  17. Kudryashova M, Snajdrova K, Weber R, Heikelmann R, Schuh H (2008) Combination of nutation time series derived from VLBI and GNSS, In: Finkelstein A, Behrend D (eds) IVS general meeting proceedings, pp 240–245. ISBN: 978-5-02-025332-2Google Scholar
  18. Lyard F, Lefèvre F, Letellier T, Francis O (2006) Modelling the global ocean tides: a modern insight from FES2004. Ocean Dyn 56:394–415. doi: 10.1007/s10236-006-0086-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marty JC, Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Bracher G, Potier L, Capdeville H, Lemoine JM, Biancale R, Fund F (2011) GINS: the CNES/GRGS multi-GNSS scientific software. Proceedings ESA 3rd international colloquium scientific and fundament aspects of the Galileo programme, September 2011, CNES Internal Publication, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  20. Ray J, Kouba J, Altamimi Z (2005) Is there utility in rigorous combinations of VLBI and GPS Earth orientation parameters? J Geodesy 79(9):505–511. doi: 10.1007/s00190-005-0007-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richard J-Y, Bizouard C, Bourda G, Deleflie F, Gambis D, Loyer S, Soudarin L (2009) GRGS combination of the terrestrial frame and Earth orientation parameters at the observation level. In: M. Heydari-Malayeri (ed.) Contribution to ITRF2008 realization, SF2A proceedings, GRAAPH session, Paris, pp 115–119Google Scholar
  22. Chassaing and Roumiguier (1965) Description d’un programme de correction différentielles utilisant l’intégration numérique, programme GIN (GINS), in French, AR/JPCH/0.339/CB/MT, CNES (ed), Brétigny sur Orge, 57ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Sahin M, Cross PA, Sellers PC (1992) Variance component estimation applied to satellite laser ranging. Bull Géodesy 66:284–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Springer T, Otten M, Romero N, Dow J (2008) “ESOC IGS, IDS, and ILRS (Re-) Processing”, 16th International Workshop On Laser Ranging, Poznan Poland, Oct. 13–17, 2008Google Scholar
  25. Springer TA (2009) NAPEOS mathematical models and algorithms. DOPS-SYS-TN-0100-OPS-GN, issue 1.0, Nov 5, 2009Google Scholar
  26. Standish EM (1998) JPL planetary and lunar ephemerides. DE405/LE405, JPL IOM 312.F-98-048Google Scholar
  27. Yaya Ph (2002) Apport des combinaisons de techniques astrométriques et géodésiques à l’estimation des paramètres d’orientation de la terre. Ph.D. thesis, Observatoire de Paris (ed), 230ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Gambis
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Y. Richard
    • 1
  • R. Biancale
    • 2
  • C. Bizouard
    • 1
  1. 1.Observatoire de Paris, SYRTE/UMR 8630/GRGSParisFrance
  2. 2.CNES/GRGSToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations