Cruise Tourism Environmental Risks

  • Hrvoje CaricEmail author


Growth of cruising tourism in Croatian Adriatic is viewed by policy makers as only through financial benefit variables, neglecting perspectives of pollution issues and biodiversity degradation. Cruisers produce environmental damage and risks that are mostly unaccounted for although, paradoxically, they could be avoided or significantly decreased. In this article those claims will be discussed by disclosing environmental risks cruising tourism produces: air emissions, communal and hazardous waste, black and gray waters, eco-toxic metals from antifouling, invasive (alien) species, hydrocarbon pollution, etc. Dubrovnik will be used as a demonstration site to asses environmental risks by using three different sets of indicators: tourism trends, pollution costs, and pollution ratios. The methodology presented here is potentially replicable to other Mediterranean destinations. Paper will close with recommendations for environmental mitigation and monitoring that could help improve quality of existing environmental management practices.


Hazardous Waste Ballast Water International Maritime Organization Gray Water Cruise Ship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ACE (2000). Assessment of antifouling agents in coastal environments. MAS3-CT98-0178, Annual Report. Feb 1999–2000.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, J. M. (2001). Oil pollution. In J. Steele, S. Thorpe, & K. Turekian (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ocean sciences. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. BIST (2010). Online statistical system of the Institute for tourism based on the official data from Central Bureau of Statistics.
  4. Carić, H. (2010). Direct pollution cost assessment of cruising tourism in the Croatian Adriatic. Financial Theory and Practice, 34(2), 161–180. Institute for Public Finance, Zagreb.Google Scholar
  5. Carić H. (2011). Pollution valuation modelling and the management of the marine environment – the case of cruise tourism. PhD thesis. Institute for oceanography and fisheries in Split.Google Scholar
  6. Central Bureau of Statistics (Državni zavod za statistiku) (2002–2010). Selected publications for crousing tourism for periods 2002–2010 (Odabrana izdanja prema programu publiciranja za 2002–2010. Poglavlje: Trgovina, ugostiteljstvo i turizam. Paragraf: Kružna putovanja stranih brodova u Republici Hrvatskoj), Crostat, Republic of Croatia, at
  7. Central Bureau of Statistics (Državni zavod za statistiku) (2005). Statistical yearbook 2004, Crostat, Republic of Croatia, at
  8. Central Bureau of Statistics (Državni zavod za statistiku) (2010a). Statistical yearbook for 2009. Paragraph 25–15. Foreign vessels on cruise in the Republic of Croatia p.419, Crostat, Republic of Croatia, at
  9. Central Bureau of Statistics (Državni zavod za statistiku) (2010b). Report: Tourism – cumulative data for 2009 (Priopčenje: Turizam – kumulativni podaci. Razdoblje od siječnja do prosinca 2009). Crostat, Republic of Croatia, at
  10. Clark, R. B. (2006). Marine pollution. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen G. (2006). Campain to Safeguard Americas Waters (C-SAW): Overview of cruise ship facts, criminal history, regulatory status and threats to the environment. Earth Island Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Commoy, J. et al. (2005). The Environmental impact of cruise ships. American Society of Civil Engineers. Proceedings: World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2005. Anchorage, Alaska, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Copeland, C. (2008). CRS report for Congress – cruise ship pollution [online]. Congressional Research, No. RL32450.
  14. Cousteau Society (2011). Plastic pollution in the Mediterranean Sea. 2. Feb 2011.
  15. Dobson, S., & Gill, A. (2006). Environmental policy challenges for the cruise industry: Case studies from Australia and USA. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism. Oxfordshire, OX10 8DE.Google Scholar
  16. Dowling, R. K. (2006). The cruising industry. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 3–17). Oxfordshire, OX10 8DECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubrovacki List (2008). The city hosts 5 cruisers with 12500 guesta.
  18. Dubrovački vjesnik (2009). “Erupcija s cruisera!”.
  19. Hempel (2007). Coating reference handbook, Hempel A/S Centre for Applied Coatings Technology / Group Technical Service. 9. Edition, 1. Print, November 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Index news portal (2004). Izbjegnuta tragedija u Dubrovniku: Brod skoro udario u hotel. 16 Aug 2004.
  21. Institute for Tourism. (2006). Survey on attitudes and expenditures of cruise ship visitors in Croatia in 2006. Zagreb: Institute for Tourism.Google Scholar
  22. Institute for Tourism. (2007). Study of Sustainable Development of Cruising Tourism in Croatia. Zagreb: Institute for Tourism.Google Scholar
  23. Jeftic, L., Hagerhall, B., & Anianson, B. (2005). Marine litter. Zagreb: UNEP.Google Scholar
  24. Kevin, T., Raymond, K., Chadwick, J., & Waldock, M. (1999). The effects of short-term changes in environmental parameters on the release of biocides from antifouling coatings: cuprous oxide and tributyltin. Applied Organic Chemistry, 13(1999), 453–460.Google Scholar
  25. Kizzia Tom (2006, August 20 ). Whale carcass docks in Seward. Anchorage Daily News.Google Scholar
  26. Klein, R. A. (2008). Paradise lost at sea, rethinking cruise vacations. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Kurtela Ž., Jelavić V., Novaković T. (2007). Štetno djelovanje ispuštenog balasta na morski okoliš. Naše more. 54.Google Scholar
  28. Marks K., Howden D. (2008). The world's rubbish dump: A garbage tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan accessed. The Independent. Tuesday, 5 Feb 2008.
  29. McCalla, R. J., & Charlier, J. J. (2006). Round-the-world cruising: A geography created by geography? In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 206–222). Oxfordshire, OX10 8DECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miola A., Ciuffo B., Giovine E., Marra M. (2010). Regulating air emissions from ships. The state of the art on methodoligies, technologies and policy options. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Institute for Environment and Sustainability.Google Scholar
  31. NRC – National Research Council. (1995). Clean ships, clean ports, clean oceans: Controlling garbage and plastic wastes at sea. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  32. Passenger Shipping Association (2006). Discover cruises – Annual cruise review.Google Scholar
  33. Rawlings T., Ruiz G.M., Schoenfeld S., Dobbs F.C., Drake L.A., Huq A., Colwell R.R., (1999). Ecology and ballast mediated Transfer of Vibrio Cholerae 01 and 0139. Conference Paper: 1st National Conference on Marine Bioinvasions January 1999, MIT Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, C. S., McLain, L., & Zulo, E. (1998). Damage to coral reefs in Virgin Islands national park and biosphere reserve from recreational activities. Coral Reefs, 2, 405–410.Google Scholar
  35. San Francisco Estuary Project (2009). How boat sewage discharges affect the environment [online]. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and California Department of Boating and Waterways. Oakland CA, USA.
  36. Schiff, K., Diehl, D., & Valkirs, A. (2003). Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels, Technical Report #405. Westminster, CA, USA: Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.Google Scholar
  37. US Senate (2007). Legislative hearing on the Marine Vessel Emissions Reduction Act of 2007, S. 1499,” U.S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works, 14 Feb 2008, p. 1.Google Scholar
  38. Stojmenović, R. (2010). Uginuli grbavi kit zaglavio na pramcu broda na Aljasci. 24 sata. Petak. 30 July 2010.
  39. Terre d’avenir (2010). Mediterranean endangered – For a sea free of waste. Expédition M.E.D. – Meditteranee en danger.
  40. TRT – Trasporti e Territorio Srl (2007). External costs of maritime transport. Report prepared by TRT for the European Parliament’s Committee on Transport and Tourism, European Parliament Directorate General. Internal Policies of the Union.
  41. US EPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency (2008). Cruise ship discharge assessment report. US EPA Oceans and Coastal Protection Division. Washington. EPA 842-R-07-005.Google Scholar
  42. Valkirs, A. O., Seligmnan, P. F., Haslbeck, E., & Caso, J. S. (2003). Measurement of copper release rates from antifouling paint under laboratory and in situ conditions: implications for loading estimation to marine water bodies. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46, 763–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ware, B. (2002, 15 December). How badly do ships pollute halifax? Halifax Daily News,.Google Scholar
  44. Weaver, A. (2005). The mcdonaldization thesis and cruise tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(2), 346–366. Elsevier Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. WTO – World Tourism Organization (2010). Concepts and definitions, available at: Accessed Feb 2010.
  46. Schiff K., Diehl D, Valkirs A. 2003. Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels“, Technical Report #405, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Westminster, CA, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for tourismZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations