Abstract
Within an analysis of the competitiveness of ports/destinations on an international cruise market, this paper is attempting to answer one of the core and permanent questions: how to obtain relevant, unbiased and objective data/information for such an analysis? The focus of this paper is to analyze the capability and features of data gathered from cruise itineraries, offered through Internet websites, to provide objective and unbiased information on the current market position of a competitive cruise port/destination. This paper is specifically focused on evaluating the scope and relevance of such easily-accessible data sources, with regards to revealing key information for the analysis of competitiveness of Mediterranean cruise ports/destinations but also on assessing the size and structure of the Mediterranean cruise market, and the competitive position of Dubrovnik as one of the leading Mediterranean ports of call. Based on cruise itineraries’ data, offered by 25 cruise companies in 2010, the Mediterranean cruise market was analyzed with regards to the total number of different itineraries and cruises. Moreover, other relevant factors include: the total number of ports/destinations participating in cruise tourism within the Mediterranean; the interdependence of the respective ports, itineraries and cruise companies; the number of cruise ships involved, according to ship size; and the seasonality of cruises. Dubrovnik’s competitive position was assessed through the comparison of cruises that have Dubrovnik as a port of call versus those that do not. Such an approach enables ports/destinations to directly assess their market position whilst also gathering information on the characteristics of ports/destinations that they rely on and/or compete with on different itineraries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bartolome, A., McAleer, M., Ramos, V., & Rey-Maquieira, J. (2009). Cruising is risky business. CIRJE Discussion paper. http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/2009/2009cf664.pdf. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
Chacko, H. E. (1998). Positioning a tourism destination to gain a competitive edge. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 1(2), 69–75.
Charlier, J. J., & McCalla, R. J. (2006). A geographical overview of the world cruise market and its seasonal complementarities. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 18–30). Oxfordshire: CABI.
Chesworth, N. (2006). The cruise industry and Atlantic Canada: A case study. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 160–169). Oxfordshire: CABI.
CLIA (2011). 2011 CLIA cruise market overview. http://cruising.org/sites/default/files/pressroom/Market_Profile_2011.pdf. Retrieved 8 Sept 2011.
Dowling, R. K. (2006). The cruising industry. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 3–17). Oxfordshire: CABI.
Ellis, C., & Kriwoken, L. K. (2006). Off the beaten track: A case study of expedition cruise ships in south-west Tasmania, Australia. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 251–258). Oxfordshire: CABI.
GPW, & BREA. (2009). Contribution of cruise tourism to the economies of Europe 2008. West Sussex/Exton, PA: Authors.
GPW, & BREA. (2010). The cruise industry: A 34 billion partner in Europe’s economic growth. Contribution of cruise tourism to the economies of Europe 2010 edition. West Sussex/Exton, PA: Authors.
Hung, K., & Petrick, J. F. (2010). Developing a measurement scale for constraints to cruising. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), 206–228.
Lekakou, M. B., Pallis, A. A., & Vaggelas, G. K. (2009). Which homeport in Europe: The cruise industry’s selection criteria. Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 4(4), 215–240.
Lew, A. A., & McKercher, B. (2002). Trip destinations, gateways and itineraries: The example of Hong Kong. Tourism Management, 23, 609–621.
Pantouvakis, A., Chlomoudis, C., & Dimas, A. (2008). Testing the SERVQUAL scale in the passenger port industry: A confirmatory study. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(5), 449–467.
Papathanassis, A., & Beckmann, I. (2011). Assessing the ‘poverty of cruise theory’ hypothesis. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 153–174.
Papathanassis, A., & Breitner, M. (2009). Online booking in the cruise sector: Determinants of online trust & implications. In A. Papathanassis (Ed.), Cruise sector growth: Managing emerging markets, human resources, processes and systems (pp. 133–154). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Papatheodorou, A. (2006). The cruise industry: An industrial organization perspective. In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 31–40). Oxfordshire: CABI.
IRN Research (2011). Statistics and source markets 2010. European Cruise Council. http://www.irn-research.com/files/2213/0224/9943/ECC%20Stats%20and%20marts%202010%20Final.pdf. Retrieved 8 Sept 2011.
Ca’ Foscari Formazione e Ricerca (2010). The new MedCruise statistics report. Barcelona: MedCruise.
Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. I. (2010). A model of destination competitiveness/sustainability: Brazilian perspectives. Brazilian Public Administration Review (RAP), 44(5), 1049–1066.
UNWTO (2007). Start to 2007 exceeds forecasts. UNWTO World Tourism Barometer, World Tourism Organization, 5 (2). http://www.unwto.org/facts/menu.html. Retrieved 8 Sept 2011.
UNWTO. (2010). Cruise tourism – current situation and trends. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
Vanhove, N. (2011). The economics of tourism destinations. London: Elsevier.
Vogel, M. P. (2004). International cruise industry: Coping with the uncertainty. Working paper, Institute for Maritime Tourism, Bremerhaven University of Applied Sciences, Bremerhaven.
Wild, G. P. (2009). International cruise market monitor. West Sussex: G.P. Wild (International) Limited.
Wood, R. E. (2004). Cruise ships: Deterritorialized destinations. In L. Lumsdon & S. J. Page (Eds.), Tourism and transport: Issues and agenda for the new millenium (pp. 133–145). Oxford: Elsevier.
Wood, R. E. (2006). Cruise tourism: A paradigmatic case of globalization? In R. K. Dowling (Ed.), Cruise ship tourism (pp. 397–406). Oxfordshire: CABI.
Acknowledgment
The research presented in this paper is partly supported by Port Authorities of two Dubrovnik’s ports, Port of Gruž and Port of Old Town, through the project Dubrovnik tariff policy in international cruise tourism for 2012–2017 conducted by Institute for Tourism, Zagreb, Croatia in 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marušić, Z., Sever, I., Ivandić, N. (2012). Mediterranean Cruise Itineraries and the Position of Dubrovnik. In: Papathanassis, A., Lukovic, T., Vogel, M. (eds) Cruise Tourism and Society. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32992-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32992-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32991-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32992-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)