Skip to main content

Are State-of-the-Art Fine-Tuning Algorithms Able to Detect a Dummy Parameter?

  • Conference paper
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XII (PPSN 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7491))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Currently, there exist several offline calibration techniques that can be used to fine-tune the parameters of a metaheuristic. Such techniques require, however, to perform a considerable number of independent runs of the metaheuristic in order to obtain meaningful information. Here, we are interested on the use of this information for assisting the algorithm designer to discard components of a metaheuristic (e.g., an evolutionary operator) that do not contribute to improving its performance (we call them “ineffective components”). In our study, we experimentally analyze the information obtained from three offline calibration techniques: F-Race, ParamILS and Revac. Our preliminary results indicate that these three calibration techniques provide different types of information, which makes it necessary to conduct a more in-depth analysis of the data obtained, in order to detect the ineffective components that are of our interest.

Partially supported by Fondecyt Project no. 1120781, CONACYT/CONICYT Project no. 2010-199 and CONACyT Project no. 103570.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartz-Beielstein, T., Lasarczyk, C.W.G., Preuss, M.: Sequential Parameter Optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 773–780 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birattari, M., Stützle, T., Paquete, L., Varrentrapp, K.: A racing algorithm for configuring metaheuristics. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 11–18. Morgan Kaufmann, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eiben, A.E., Schut, M.C.: New Ways to Calibrate Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Advances in Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization, pp. 153–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Fialho, Á., Da Costa, L., Schoenauer, M., Sebag, M.: Analyzing bandit-based adaptive operator selection mechanisms. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence – Special Issue on Learning and Intelligent Optimization (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hutter, F., Hoos, H.H., Stützle, T.: Automatic algorithm configuration based on local search. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 1152–1157 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maturana, J., Lardeux, F., Saubion, F.: Autonomous operator management for evolutionary algorithms. Journal of Heuristics 16, 881–909 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Montero, E., Riff, M.C., Neveu, B.: C-strategy: A Dynamic Adaptive Strategy for the CLONALG Algorithm. Transactions on Computational Sciences, Special Issue 8, 41–55 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Montero, E., Riff, M.C.: On-the-fly calibrating strategies for evolutionary algorithms. Information Sciences 181(3), 552–566 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nannen, V., Eiben, A.: Relevance estimation and value calibration of evolutionary algorithm parameters. In: Joint International Conference for Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 975–980 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D.E., Lobo, F.G.: A Survey of Optimization by Building and Using Probabilistic Models. Computational Optimization and Applications 21(1), 5–20 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Solnon, C.: Ants can solve constraint satisfaction problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(4), 347–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan, Z., de Oca, M.A.M., Stützle, T., Birattari, M.: Continuous optimization algorithms for tuning real and integer parameters of swarm intelligence algorithms. IRIDIA - Technical Report Serie TR/IRIDIA/2011-017, Université Libre de Bruxelles (Agosto 2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Montero, E., Riff, MC., Pérez-Caceres, L., Coello Coello, C.A. (2012). Are State-of-the-Art Fine-Tuning Algorithms Able to Detect a Dummy Parameter?. In: Coello, C.A.C., Cutello, V., Deb, K., Forrest, S., Nicosia, G., Pavone, M. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XII. PPSN 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7491. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32937-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32937-1_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32936-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32937-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics