Skip to main content

Alternative Restart Strategies for CMA-ES

  • Conference paper
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XII (PPSN 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7491))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper focuses on the restart strategy of CMA-ES on multi-modal functions. A first alternative strategy proceeds by decreasing the initial step-size of the mutation while doubling the population size at each restart. A second strategy adaptively allocates the computational budget among the restart settings in the BIPOP scheme. Both restart strategies are validated on the BBOB benchmark; their generality is also demonstrated on an independent real-world problem suite related to spacecraft trajectory optimization.

Work partially funded by FUI of System@tic Paris-Region ICT cluster through contract DGT 117 407 Complex Systems Design Lab (CSDL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addis, B., Cassioli, A., Locatelli, M., Schoen, F.: Global optimization for the design of space trajectories. Optimization On Line, 11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Auger, A., Hansen, N.: A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), pp. 1769–1776. IEEE Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. García, S., Molina, D., Lozano, M., Herrera, F.: A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behaviour: a case study on the CEC 2005 special session on real parameter optimization. Journal of Heuristics 15, 617–644 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, N.: Compilation of results on the 2005 CEC benchmark function set (May 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, N.: Benchmarking a BI-population CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 function testbed. In: Rothlauf, F. (ed.) GECCO Companion, pp. 2389–2396. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen, N.: References to CMA-ES applications (2009), http://www.lri.fr/~hansen/cmaapplications.pdf

  7. Hansen, N., Auger, A., Finck, S., Ros, R.: Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2012: Experimental setup. Technical report, INRIA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, N., Finck, S., Ros, R., Auger, A.: Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2009: Noiseless functions definitions. Technical Report RR-6829, INRIA (2009) (updated, February 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen, N., Kern, S.: Evaluating the CMA Evolution Strategy on Multimodal Test Functions. In: Yao, X., Burke, E.K., Lozano, J.A., Smith, J., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Bullinaria, J.A., Rowe, J.E., Tiňo, P., Kabán, A., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 282–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, N., Ostermeier, A.: Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation 9(2), 159–195 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen, N., Ros, R.: Benchmarking a weighted negative covariance matrix update on the BBOB-2010 noiseless testbed. In: GECCO 2010: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference Comp. on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1673–1680. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jastrebski, G.A., Arnold, D.V.: Improving evolution strategies through active covariance matrix adaptation. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006, pp. 2814–2821 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loshchilov, I., Schoenauer, M., Sebag, M.: Black-box Optimization Benchmarking of NIPOP-aCMA-ES and NBIPOP-aCMA-ES on the BBOB-2012 Noiseless Testbed. In: GECCO 2012: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. ACM (page to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loshchilov, I., Schoenauer, M., Sebag, M.: Self-Adaptive Surrogate-Assisted Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy. In: GECCO 2012 Proceedings. ACM (page to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stracquadanio, G., La Ferla, A., De Felice, M., Nicosia, G.: Design of robust space trajectories. In: Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVIII, pp. 341–354. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vinko, T., Izzo, D.: Global Optimisation Heuristics and Test Problems for Preliminary Spacecraft Trajectory Design. Technical Report GOHTPPSTD, European Space Agency (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loshchilov, I., Schoenauer, M., Sebag, M. (2012). Alternative Restart Strategies for CMA-ES. In: Coello, C.A.C., Cutello, V., Deb, K., Forrest, S., Nicosia, G., Pavone, M. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XII. PPSN 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7491. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32937-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32937-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32936-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32937-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics