Skip to main content

A Viewpoint for More Ethical Approach in Healthcare Information System Development and Procurement: The Four Principles

  • Conference paper
Book cover Exploring the Abyss of Inequalities (WIS 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 313))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Healthcare is a field where the influence of ethics needs to be strong. It should also cover the area of information system development in healthcare. Great amounts or research about ethics, healthcare and information system development and combinations of those can be found. However, the actual development of healthcare information systems has a serious lack of understanding of ethical codes of healthcare and it seems that financial values may bypass ethical ones. Several examples of the consequences to healthcare information systems, in which financial values in conjunction with technological determinism are controlling the decisions, are presented and critiqued.

The four principles of medicine: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice are seen as a promising basis for analysis of information system development in healthcare. The four principles seem to be suitable for healthcare professionals and - as discussed in this paper - for information system developers. Hence these principles could be held as the common ethical ground for both. If these principles could be put into actual use in information system development of healthcare sector many problems faced would be solved, or at least some of the main problems in it can be revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Numminen, O., Van der Arend, A., Leino-Kilpi, H.: Nurses’ codes of ethics in practice and education: a review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 23, 380–394 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillon, R.: Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. British Medical Journal 309(6948) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp, T., Childress, J.: Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beauchamp, T.: Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 29, 269–274 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American medical association (2012), http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/principles-medical-ethics.page? (accessed May 20, 2012)

  6. International Medical Informatics Association (2012), http://www.imia-medinfo.org/new2/pubdocs/Ethics_Eng.pdf (accessed May 9, 2012)

  7. Callahan, D.: Principlism and communtariasm. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(5), 287–291 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillon, R.: When four principles are too many: a commentary. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(4), 197–198 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (2012), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personal-autonomy/ (accessed April 9, 2011)

  10. Wulff, H., Pedersen, S., Rosenberg, R.: Philosophy of Medicine – an introduction. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Svenaeus, F.: The Hermeneutics of Medicine and Phenomenology of Health: Steps Towards Philosophy of Medical Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koskinen, J.: Phenomenological view of health and patient empowerement with Personal Health Record. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Well-being in the Information Society, TUCS General Publication no 56 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leino-Kilpi, H., Välimäki, M., Arndt, M., Dassen, T., Gasull, M., Lemonidou, C., Scott, P., Bansemir, G., Cabrera, E., Papaevangelou, H., Mc Parland, J.: Patient’s Autonomy, Privacy and Informed Consent. IOS Press, The Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gampbell, A., Gillet, G., Jones, G.: Medical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Singapore (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gillon, R.: Primum non nocere. and the principle of non-maleficence. British Medical Journal 291, 130–131 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kant, I.: Originally Grundlegung zur Metaphysic der Sitten v(1785), Several translations, two main translations: translated by Bennett, J.: Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (2008); translated by Salomaa, J.: Siveysopilliset pääteokset, Tapojen metafysiikan perustus. Porvoo, Werner Södeström Osakeyhtiö (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Act of Patient’s Status and Rights. Finland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Denier, Y.: On Personal Responsibility and the Human Right to Healthcare. Gambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14, 224–234 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deutsch, E., Duftschmid, G., Dorda, W.: Critical areas of national electronic health record programs-is our focus correct? International Journal of Medical Informatics 79(3), 211–222 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S., Shekelle, P.: Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Annals of International Medicine 144(10), 742–752 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Himmelstein, D., Wright, A., Woolhandler, S.: Hospital Computing and the Costs and Quality of Care: A National Study. The American Journal of Medicine 123(1), 40–46 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heeks, R.: Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. Interational Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 125–137 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heimo, O., Hakkala, A., Kimppa, K.: The Problems with Security and Privacy in eGovernment - Case: Biometric Passports in Finland. In: Ethicomp 2011, Sheffield, UK, pp. 210–217 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nurminen, M.I., Forsman, U.: Reversed Quality Life Cycle Model. In: Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management - IV, pp. 393–398. Elsevier Science B.V., North-Holland (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mercuri, R.: Electronic Vote Tabulation: Checks and Balances. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2001), http://www.cis.upenn.edu/grad/documents/mercuri-r.pdf (accessed April 4, 2012)

  27. Gonggrijp, R., Hengeveld, W.-J.: Studying the Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a computer security perspective, Wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet. In: Proceedings of the USENIX Workshop on Accurate Electronic Voting Technology (2007), http://wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/images/c/ce/ES3B_EVT07.pdf (accessed April 4, 2012)

  28. Verzola, R.: The Cost of Automating Elections (2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150267 (accessed April 4, 2012)

  29. Avison, D., Torkzadeh, G.: Information systems project management. Sage publication, United States of America (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fleischman, W.M.: Electronic Voting Systems and The Therac-25: What Have We Learned? In: Ethicomp 2010, Tarragona, Spain, April 14-16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Heimo, O.I., Fairweather, N.B., Kimppa, K.K.: The Finnish eVoting Experiment: What Went Wrong? In: Ethicomp 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heimo, O.I., Hakkala, A., Kimppa, K.K.: How to Abuse Biometric Passport Systems. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 10, 68–81 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koskinen, J.S., Heimo, O.I., Kimppa, K.K. (2012). A Viewpoint for More Ethical Approach in Healthcare Information System Development and Procurement: The Four Principles. In: Eriksson-Backa, K., Luoma, A., Krook, E. (eds) Exploring the Abyss of Inequalities. WIS 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 313. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32850-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32850-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32849-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32850-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics