Skip to main content

Ontology Model for National Science and Technology

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Technology (KTW 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 295))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Heterogeneous data from various sources related to the National Science and Technology (NST) domain can be represented using ontological modelling. Data about researchers, research organizations, research projects, publications and research facilities are represented in Resource Description Framework (RDF), enabling all the data to relate to each other and can be easily made accessible to the user. Reusing standard existing vocabularies such as Friend-of-A-Friend (FOAF), Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) and Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities (SIOC) also enable knowledge reusability and interoperability. This paper will talk about the techniques used to model the ontology for Malaysia Science, Technology and Innovation Knowledge Base system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Science, Technology, Engineering and Innovation for Development: A Vision for the Americans in the Twenty First Century. Organization of American States Executive Secretariat for Integral Development Office of Education, Science and Technology (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeh, T., Walker, J.: Library portals: Toward the semantic Web. In: New Library World, vol. 104(1184/1185) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Franz. Inc. AllegroGraph RDFStore Web 3.0’s Database, http://www.franz.com/agraph/allegrograph/ (last visited: May 2011)

  4. Malaysian Research & Development Classification System, http://mrdcs.mastic.gov.my/mrdcs/index2.php?menu=mapping_centre&menu_dyn=classification (last visited: May 2011)

  5. SIOC Core Ontology Specification (2006), http://sioc-project.org/ontology (last visited: May 2011)

  6. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ (2010) (last visited: May 2011)

  7. FOAF Vocabulary Specification 0.98, http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/ (last visited: May 2011)

  8. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ (last visited: May 2011)

  9. W3C Inference (2010), http://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/inference (last visited: May 2011)

  10. Taylor, C.: Information Access Service, An Introduction to Metadata, The University Of Queensland, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brinkley, J.F., Suciu, D., Detwiler, L.T., Gennari, J.H., Rosse, C.: Framework for using reference ontologies as a foundation for the semantic web. In: Proceedings, American Medical Informatics Association Fall 2006 Symposium, Bethesda, MD, pp. 96–100 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bontas, E.P., Mochol, M., Tolksdorf, R.: Case Studies on Ontology Reuse. In: Proceedings of I-KNOW 2005, Graz, Austria, June 29-July 1 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. URIs, URLs, and URNs: Clarifications and Recommendations 1.0 Report from the joint W3C/IETF URI Planning Interest Group, W3C Note, September 21 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. The European Organization for International Research Information, euroCRIS (2010), http://www.eurocris.org/Index.php?page=homepage&t=1 (last visited: May 2011)

  15. ReSIST RKB Explorer, http://www.rkbexplorer.com (last visited: May 2011)

  16. Glaser, H., Millard, I., Anderson, T., Randell, B.: ReSIST Project Deliverable D10: Prototype knowledge base (2006), http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14304/1/D10-TR.pdf (last visited May 2011)

  17. Granitzer, M., Sabol, V., Kow, W.O., Lukose, D., Tochtermann, K.: Ontology Alignment—A Survey with Focus on Visually Supported Semi-Automatic Techniques. In: Future Internet (2010) ISSN 1999-5903

    Google Scholar 

  18. CERIF. euroCRIS Research Classification Scheme (1991), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/cerif/docs/cerif1991.htm (last visited: May 2011)

  19. The ACM Computing Classification System (1998), http://www.acm.org/about/class/1998/ (last visited: May 2011)

  20. CERIF Ontology (2004), http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF2004/CERIF2004_ontology.xml (last visited: May 2011)

  21. AKT Reference Ontology, http://www.aktors.org/publications/ontology/ (last visited: May 2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lim Sien Niu, M., Selan, N.E., Lukose, D., Bahari, A. (2012). Ontology Model for National Science and Technology. In: Lukose, D., Ahmad, A.R., Suliman, A. (eds) Knowledge Technology. KTW 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 295. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32826-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32826-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32825-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32826-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics