Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of the Impact of Statistical and Semantic Features in the Framework of Extractive Text Summarization

  • Conference paper
Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7499))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of a set of statistical and semantic features as applied to the task of extractive summary generation for English. This set includes word frequency, inverse sentence frequency, inverse term frequency, corpus-tailored stopwords, word senses, resolved anaphora and textual entailment. The obtained results show that not all of the selected features equally benefit the performance. The term frequency combined with stopwords filtering is a highly competitive baseline that nevertheless can be topped when semantic information is included. However, in the selected experiment environment the recall values improved less than expected and we are interested in further investigating the reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blake, C.: A Comparison of Document, Sentence, and Term Event Spaces. In: ACL-44 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 601–608. ACL, Stroudsburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang, W.T., Yang, J.: Text Summarization by Sentence Segment Extraction Using Machine Learning Algorithms. In: Terano, T., Chen, A.L.P. (eds.) PAKDD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1805, pp. 454–457. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujii, Y., Kitaoka, N., Nakagawa, S.: Automatic Extraction of Cue Phrases for Important Sentences in Lecture Speech and Automatic Lecture Speech Summarization. In: INTERSPEECH, pp. 2801–2804 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrández, O., Micol, M., Muñoz, R., Palomar, M.: A perspective-based approach for solving textual entailment recognition. In: ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 66–71 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harabagiu, S., Lacatusu, F.: Topic Themes for Multi-document Summarization. In: 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 202–209 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harabagiu, S., Hickl, A., Lacatusu, F.: Satisfying Information Needs with Multi-document Summaries. Information Processing & Management 43(6), 1619–1642 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, C.Y.: ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. In: ACL Text Summarization Workshop, pp. 74–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lloret, E., Ferrández, O., Muñoz, R., Palomar, M.: A Text Summarization Approach Under the Influence of Textual Entailment. In: 5th International Workshop on NLPCS, pp. 22–31 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luhn, H.P.: The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2(2), 157–165 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nenkova, A., Vanderwende, L., McKeown, K.: A Compositional Context Sensitive Multi-doscument Summarizer: Exploring the Factors That Influence Summarization. In: 29th SIGIR, pp. 573–580. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plaza, L., Díaz, A.: Using Semantic Graphs and Word Sense Disambiguation. Techniques to Improve Text Summarization. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 47, 97–105 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saggion, H.: A Robust and Adaptable Summarization Tool. Traitement Automatique des Languages 49(2), 103–125 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberger, J., Poesio, M., Kabadjov, M.A., Ježek, K.: Two Uses of Anaphora Resolution in Summarization. Information Processing and Management 43(6), 1663–1680 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatar, D., Tamaianu-Morita, E., Mihis, A., Lupsa, D.: Summarization by Logic Segmentation and Text Entailment. In: 33rd CICLing, pp. 15–26 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vodolazova, T., Lloret, E., Muñoz, R., Palomar, M. (2012). A Comparative Study of the Impact of Statistical and Semantic Features in the Framework of Extractive Text Summarization. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech and Dialogue. TSD 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7499. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32790-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32790-2_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32789-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32790-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics