Advertisement

Surgical Considerations

  • Kyriakos Anastasiadis
  • Polychronis Antonitsis
  • Helena Argiriadou
Chapter

Abstract

Minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) systems represent a promising technology in heart surgery. The results from series of patients being operated on minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) are impressive, and the net outcome from their use is a stable intraoperative and postoperative course for the patient and a significantly less morbidity as well as lower perioperative mortality [1]. However, use of MECC demands a close multidisciplinary effort from the surgical team (surgeon, anaesthetist, perfusionist) comprising delicate and focused manoeuvres intraoperatively as well as a high level of cooperation from the team. Hence, a learning curve for obtaining the best performance is necessary [2]. Remadi et al. were from the first surgical teams who used the systems and first reported that the application of MECC requires the team to undergo a considerable learning curve [3]. As a result the report of a reduction in intraoperative blood loss after 50 cases with MECC was explained by this learning curve. Overall, teaching MECC has to be focused in the proper intraoperative setting, the consideration of tips and tricks, pitfalls, and drawbacks of the technique as well as the manoeuvres which are necessary from each one of the surgical team so as to perform a safe and stable procedure.

Keywords

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Mean Arterial Pressure Inferior Vena Cava Aortic Root Venous Cannula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Haidich AB, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Papakonstantinou C (2012) Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdel-Rahman U, Ozalan F, Risteski PS, Martens S, Moritz A, Al Daraghmeh A, Keller H, Wimmer-Greinecker G (2005) Initial experience with a ­minimized extracorporeal bypass system: is there a clinical benefit? Ann Thorac Surg 80:238–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Remadi JP, Rakotoarivello Z, Marticho P, Trojette F, Benamar A, Poulain H, Tribouilloy C (2004) Aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized prospective trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 128:436–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panday GF, Fischer S, Bauer A, Metz D, Schubel J, El Shouki N, Eberle T, Hausmann H (2009) Minimal extracorporeal circulation and off-pump compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:832–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Immer FF, Pirovino C, Gygax E, Englberger L, Tevaearai H, Carrel TP (2005) Minimal versus ­conventional cardiopulmonary bypass: assessment of intraoperative myocardial damage in coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:701–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nollert G, Schwabenland I, Maktav D, Kur F, Christ F, Fraunberger P, Reichart B, Vicol C (2005) Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins. Ann Thorac Surg 80:2326–2332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinivas K, Singh K (2001) Combination of autologous transfusion and retrograde autologous priming decreases blood requirements. Ann Card Anaesth 4:28–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Habib RH, Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ, Shah A (2003) Adverse effects of low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass in the adult: should current practice be changed? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1438–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiesenack C, Liebold A, Philipp A, Ritzka M, Koppenberg J, Birnbaum DE, Keyl C (2004) Four years’ experience with a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system and its influence on clinical ­outcome. Artif Organs 28:1082–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bauer A, Diez C, Schubel J, El-Shouki N, Metz D, Eberle T, Hausmann H (2010) Evaluation of hemodynamic and regional tissue perfusion effects of minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC). J Extra Corpor Technol 42:30–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skrabal CA, Steinhoff G, Liebold A (2007) Minimizing cardiopulmonary bypass attenuates myocardial damage after cardiac surgery. ASAIO J 53:32–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakwa MP, Emery RW, Shannon FL, Altshuler JM, Mitchell D, Zwada D, Holter AR (2009) Coronary artery bypass grafting with a minimized ­cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: a prospective, randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:481–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yilmaz A, Sjatskig J, van Boven WJ, Waanders FG, Kelder JC, Sonker U, Kloppenburg GT (2010) Combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal closed circuit circulation versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11:754–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fernandes P, MacDonald J, Cleland A, Mayer R, Fox S, Kiaii B (2009) The use of a mini bypass circuit for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Perfusion 24:163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Remadi JP, Rakotoarivelo Z, Marticho P, Benamar A (2006) Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J 151:198.e1–198.e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simons AP, Weerwind PW (2011) Microbubble formation during minimized cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 35:554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liebold A, Khosravi A, Westphal B, Skrabal C, Choi YH, Stamm C, Kaminski A, Alms A, Birken T, Zurakowski D, Steinhoff G (2006) Effect of closed minimized cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral tissue oxygenation and microembolization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:268–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norman MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR (2004) The effectiveness of low prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol 36:336–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA (2002) How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol 34:34–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, Vasiliou M, Green RE, Feindel CM (2001) Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:743–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorko L, Feindel CM (1999) Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 68:89–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodriguez RA, Williams KA, Babaev A, Rubens F, Nathan HJ (2005) Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 20:3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perthel M, Kseibi S, Sagebiel F, Alken A, Laas J (2005) Comparison of conventional extracorporeal circulation and minimal extracorporeal circulation with respect to microbubbles and microembolic signals. Perfusion 20:329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    La Pietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, Esposito RA, Galloway AC, Derivaux CC, Glassman LR, Culliford AT, Ribakove GH, Colvin SB (2000) Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:856–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rider SP, Simon LV, Rice BJ, Poulton CC (1998) Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol 30:160–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roosenhoff TP, Stehouwer MC, De Vroege R, Butter RP, Van Boven WJ, Bruins P (2010) Air removal efficiency of a venous bubble trap in a minimal extracorporeal circuit during coronary artery bypass grafting. Artif Organs 34:1092–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Remadi JP, Marticho P, Butoi I, Rakotoarivelo Z, Trojette F, Benamar A, Beloucif S, Foure D, Poulain HJ (2004) Clinical experience with the mini-extracorporeal circulation system: an evolution or a revolution? Ann Thorac Surg 77:2172–2175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kutschka I, Schonrock U, El Essawi A, Pahari D, Anssar M, Harringer W (2007) A new minimized perfusion circuit provides highly effective ultrasound controlled deairing. Artif Organs 31:215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fayad G, Modine T, Naja G, Larrue B, Azzaoui R, Crépin F, Decoene C, Benhamed L, Koussa M, Gourlay T, Warembourg H (2005) Second generation of minimal invasive extracorporeal circuit: pilot study resting heart system. J Extra Corpor Technol 37:387–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mueller XM, Jegger D, Augstburger M, Horisberger J, Godar G, von Segesser LK (2002) A new concept of integrated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:840–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ, Gorman DF (1999) Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1285–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mitchell SJ, Willcox T, Gorman DF (1997) Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: a comparative study. Perfusion 12:325–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kutschka I, Skorpil J, El Essawi A, Hajek T, Harringer W (2009) Beneficial effects of modern perfusion concepts in aortic valve and aortic root surgery. Perfusion 24:37–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mitsumaru A, Yozu R, Matayoshi T, Morita M, Shin H, Tsutsumi K, Iino Y, Kawada S (2001) Efficiency of an air filter at the drainage site in a closed circuit with a centrifugal blood pump: an in vitro study. ASAIO J 47:692–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Perthel M, El-Ayoubi L, Bendisch A, Laas J, Gerigk M (2007) Clinical advantages of using mini-bypass systems in terms of blood product use, postoperative bleeding and air entrainment: an in vivo clinical perspective. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31:1070–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yilmaz A, Rehman A, Sonker U, Kloppenburg GT (2009) Minimal access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extracorporeal circulatory system. Ann Thorac Surg 87:720–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Benedetto U, Luciani R, Goracci M, Capuano F, Refice S, Angeloni E, Roscitano A, Sinatra R (2009) Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass and acute kidney injury in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 88:529–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Remadi JP (2008) Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1000–1001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Immer FF, Ackerman A, Gygax E, Stalder M, Englberger L, Eckstein FS, Tevaearai HT, Schmidli J, Carrel TP (2007) Minimal extracorporeal circulation is a promising technique for coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1515–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ti LK, Goh BL, Wong PS, Ong P, Goh SG, Lee CN (2008) Comparison of mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system with air-purge device to conventional bypass system. Ann Thorac Surg 85:994–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ovrum E, Holen EA, Tangen G, Brosstad F, Abdelnoor M, Ringdal ML, Oystese R, Istad R (1995) Completely heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass and reduced systemic heparin: clinical and hemostatic effects. Ann Thorac Surg 60:365–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyriakos Anastasiadis
    • 1
  • Polychronis Antonitsis
    • 1
  • Helena Argiriadou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryAHEPA University Hospital Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations