Abstract
It is well-known that pure Resource Description Framework (RDF) is not suitable to represent trust information. This work is to overcome these limitations. In our proposal RDF graphs are extended by trust metrics. The paper describes a mechanism for representing and reasoning with trust annotated RDF data. We present how with metric algebra such an annotation can be used for processing data on inferred RDF triples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, C., Lloyd, S.: Understanding PKI: Concepts, Standards, and Deployment Considerations. Sams (2002)
Bizer, C., Cyganiak, R.: The trig syntax. Tech. rep., Freie Universität Berlin (2007)
Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: Rdf vocabulary description language 1.0: Rdf schema. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium (2004)
Carroll, J.J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P., Stickler, P.: Named graphs, provenance and trust. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 613–622 (2005)
Cyganiak, R., Wood, D.: Resource description framework (rdf): Concepts and abstract syntaxrdfcas. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium (2012)
Golbeck, J.: Combining provenance with trust in social networks for semantic web content filtering. Provenance and Annotation of Data, 101–108 (2006)
Golbeck, J., Parsia, B., Hendler, J.: Trust networks on the semantic web. Cooperative Information Agents VII, 238–249 (2003)
Heath, T., Motta, E.: The hoonoh ontology for describing trust relationships in information seeking. In: Personal Identification and Collaborations: Knowledge Mediation and Extraction (PICKME 2008), pp. 67–75 (2008)
Hogan, A., Bonatti, P., Polleres, A., Sauro, L.: Robust and scalable linked data reasoning incorporating provenance and trust annotations. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2011)
Marsh, S.: Formalising trust as a computational concept. Ph.D. thesis. University of Stirling (1994)
Munoz, S., Pérez, J., Gutierrez, C.: Minimal deductive systems for rdf. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 53–67 (2007)
Prud’hommeaux, E., Carothers, G.: Turtle - terse rdf triple language. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium (2012)
Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., Domingos, P.: Trust Management for the Semantic Web. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 351–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Schneider, M.: Owl 2 web ontology language rdf-based semantics. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium (2009)
Straccia, U., Lopes, N., Lukácsy, G., Polleres, A.: A general framework for representing and reasoning with annotated semantic web data. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2010), pp. 1437–1442 (2010)
Udrea, O., Recupero, D., Subrahmanian, V.: Annotated rdf. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 487–501 (2006)
Zimmermann, P.: PGP User’s Guide. MIT Press (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tomaszuk, D., Pąk, K., Rybiński, H. (2013). Trust in RDF Graphs. In: Morzy, T., Härder, T., Wrembel, R. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32741-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32741-4_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32740-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32741-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)