Skip to main content

Are Left-Right Hemisphere Errors in Point-to-Origin Tasks in VR Caused by Failure to Incorporate Heading Changes?

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7463))

Abstract

Optic flow displays are frequently used both in spatial cognition/psy-chology research and VR simulations to avoid the influence of recognizable landmarks. However, optic flow displays not only lead to frequent misperceptions of simulated turns, but also to drastic qualitative errors: When asked to point back to the origin of locomotion after viewing simulated 2-segment excursions in VR, between 40% (Riecke 2008) and 100% (Klatzky et al., 1998) of participants responded as if they failed to update and incorporate the visually simulated turns into their responses. To further investigate such ”NonTurner” behaviour, the current study used a wider range of path geometries that allow for clearer disambiguation of underlying strategies and mental processes. 55% of participants showed clear qualitative pointing errors (left-right hemisphere errors), thus confirming the reliability of the effect and the difficulties in properly using optic flow even in high-quality VR displays. Results suggest that these qualitative errors are not caused by left-right mirrored responses, but are indeed based on a failure to properly incorporate visually presented turns into point-to-origin responses. While the majority of these qualitative errors could be attributed to NonTurner behaviour as previously proposed, we identified a novel, modified NonTurner strategy that could reconcile prior findings. Finally, results suggest that Turners (which properly incorporate visually presented turns) might use online updating of the homing direction, whereas NonTurners resort to more effortful and cognitively demanding offline strategies. Better understanding these strategies and underlying processes and how they depend on stimulus and display parameters can help to inform the design of more effective VR simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avraamides, M.N., Kelly, J.W.: Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cognitive Processing 9, 93–106 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamides, M.N., Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Golledge, R.G.: Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science 15(6), 403–408 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batschelet, E.: Circular statistics in biology. Acad. Pr., London (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, S.S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J.M.: Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(2), 168–178 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coluccia, E., Louse, G.: Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(3), 329–340 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, R.D., Sholl, M.J.: Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology– Learning, Memory and Cognition 21(2), 483–500 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, A.S., Jeffery, K.J.: Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14(2), 180–192 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J., Robertson, I.H.: Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology– Learning Memory and Cognition 24(1), 227–233 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, N., Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G.: A minimal representation for dead-reckoning in navigation: Updating the homing vector. Geographical Analysis 22(4), 326–335 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C.R.: The organization of learning. Learning, development, and conceptual change. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R.G.: Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. JHU Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramann, K.: Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity. Spatial Cognition and Computation (2012) (online pre-print), doi:10.1080/13875868.2011.589038

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramann, K., Muller, H.J., Eick, E.M., Schonebeck, B.: Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance 31(6), 1199–1223 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramann, K., Onton, J., Riccobon, D., Mueller, H.J., Bardins, S., Makeig, S.: Human brain dynamics accompanying use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames during navigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(12), 2836–2849 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramann, K., Wing, S., Jung, T.-P., Viirre, E., Riecke, B.E.: Switching spatial reference frames for yaw and pitch navigation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 12(2-3), 159–194 (2012), doi:10.1080/13875868.2011.645176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Beall, A.C., Chance, S.S., Golledge, R.G.: Spatial updating of Self-Position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science 9(4), 293–298 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C.A., Morrin, K.A.: Gender differences in pointing accuracy in Computer-Simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles 40(1-2), 73–92 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Philbeck, J.W.: Human navigation by path integration. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and other Spatial Processes, pp. 125–151. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, O., Adamo, D., Briceno, E., Moffat, S.D.: Age differences in visual path integration. Behavioural Brain Research 205(1), 88–95 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, R., Séguinot, V.: What is modelling for?– a critical review of the models of path integration. Journal of Theoretical Biology 175(4), 457–475 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, M.: Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery. Psychologische Beiträge 38(3/4), 418–434 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M., Klatzky, R.L.: Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology– Learning, Memory and Cognition 26(1), 169–186 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M., Wehner, R.: Path integration in desert ants cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85(14), 5287–5290 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M., Wehner, R.: Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Current Biology 20(15), 1368–1371 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presson, C.C., Montello, D.R.: Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception 23(12), 1447–1455 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riecke, B.E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Bülthoff, H.H.: Perceiving simulated Ego-Motions in virtual reality - comparing large screen displays with HMDs. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, San Jose, CA, USA, vol. 5666, pp. 344–355 (2005a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecke, B.E.: How far can we get with just visual information? Path integration and spatial updating studies in virtual reality, Logos, Berlin, vol. 8 (2003), http://www.logos-verlag.de/cgi-bin/buch/isbn/0440

  • Riecke, B.E.: Consistent Left-Right reversals for visual path integration in virtual reality: More than a failure to update one’s heading? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17(2), 143–175 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Riecke, B.E., Cunningham, D.W., Bülthoff, H.H.: Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research 71(3), 298–313 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riecke, B.E., Heyde, M.V.D., Bülthoff, H.H.: Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 183–215 (2005b); ACM ID: 1077401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riecke, B.E., van Veen, H.A.H.C., Bülthoff, H.H.: Visual homing is possible without landmarks: a path integration study in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11, 443–473 (2002); ACM ID: 772746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J.J.: Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(6), 1157–1165 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N., Metzler, J.: Mental rotation of 3-Dimensional objects. Science 171(3972), 701–703 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdarson, S., Milne, A.P., Feuereissen, D., Riecke, B.E.: Can phys-i-cal motions pre-vent dis-ori-en-ta-tion in nat-u-ral-is-tic VR? Orange County, CA, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H., Fay, E.: Schlauchfiguren - Ein Test zur Beurteilung des räumlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Hogrefe, Göttingen (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J.M., Berthoz, A., Wolbers, T.: Dissociable cognitive mechanisms underlying human path integration. Experimental Brain Research 208(1), 61–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J.M., Mallot, H.A.: Path complexity does not impair visual path integration. Spatial Cognition and Computation 6(4), 333–346 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Riecke, B.E. (2012). Are Left-Right Hemisphere Errors in Point-to-Origin Tasks in VR Caused by Failure to Incorporate Heading Changes?. In: Stachniss, C., Schill, K., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition VIII. Spatial Cognition 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7463. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32731-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32732-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics