Skip to main content

A Worked Proposal on eParticipation for State Wide Elections

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7452))

Abstract

Web 2.0 and, more recently, Social Media, created new forms of social behavior and political engagement. This paper presents a proposal for digital mediation for direct public participation during electoral periods. Mediation is implemented by a web application based on social media principles, iLeger, specifically designed to gather voters and candidates in a shared deliberative space. Interaction and collaboration between these key stakeholders is supported through questions, answers, suggestions, comments, votes and live debates. With this proposal it is intended to contribute to narrow the communication gap between voters and candidates, make campaigns more open and encourage citizens to become involved and participate in electoral debates. This paper includes results of a case study about the Portuguese Parliamentary Elections held in 2011 and conclusions derived from the use of iLeger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management 27, 406–421 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kes-Erkul, A., Erdem Erkul, R.: Web 2.0 in the Process of e-participation: The Case of Organizing for America and the Obama Administration. National Center for Digital Government, Working paper No. 09-001, submitted October 6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.: Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 25–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bimber, B., Davis, R.: Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. Oxford University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sousa, A.A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L.B.: Governmeter: Monitoring Government Performance. A Web Based Application Proposal. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds.) EGOVIS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6267, pp. 158–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Sousa, A.A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L.B.: iLeger: A Web Based Application for Participative Elections. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 228–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. SmartVote, http://www.smartvote.ch/ (accessed March 15, 2011)

  8. CNN ElectionCenter 2008, http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/ (accessed May 6, 2010)

  9. Abgeordneten, http://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/ (accessed May 20, 2010)

  10. Aggio, C., Marques, J., Sampaio, R.: Campanhas Online, Participação Política e Esfera Pública: O Caso do Plano de Governo Colaborativo nas Eleições Brasileiras de 2010. Public Sphere Reconsidered -Theories and Practices, pp. 3–21. LabCom Books (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talbot, D.: How Obama Really Did It: The social-networking strategy that took an obscure senator to the doors of the White House. Technology Review 9/10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greengard, S.: The First Internet President. Communications of the ACM 52(2), 16–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright, S.: Government-run Online Discussion Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8(4), 550–568 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor-Smith, E., Lindner, R.: Using Social Networking Tools to Promote eParticipation Initiatives. In: Prosser, A., Parycek, P. (eds.) Proceedings of EDEM 2009 - Conference on Electronic Democracy, Vienna, pp. 115–121 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moreira, A.M., Moller, M., Gerhardt, G., Ladner, A.: E-Society and E-Democracy. In: eGovernment Symposium, Berne, Switzerland (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stromer-Galley, J.: On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication 50(4), 111–132 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosembaum, S.: Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers are Creators, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sousa, A.A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L.B. (2012). A Worked Proposal on eParticipation for State Wide Elections. In: Kő, A., Leitner, C., Leitold, H., Prosser, A. (eds) Advancing Democracy, Government and Governance. EGOVIS/EDEM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32701-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32701-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32701-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics