Skip to main content

A Novel Model to Improve the Efficiency of the Think Tank Room Approach for Knowledge-Based IT Environments

  • Conference paper
  • 964 Accesses

Abstract

Thinkers in IT management and IT industry with slight difference in opinion have put forward various categories of staff members. Strategists, high ranking, or candidates for key positions use the Think Tank Room term to indicate they have preplanned and reliable programs. In reality, if scientists lacking work experience, or strategists unfamiliar with contingencies of the day occupy such think tank rooms, the undoubtedly the disadvantages of the room are much more than its advantages.The Collaborate Think Tank Room (CTTR) model, proposed in this article, compensate the disadvantages of traditional think tank room model by using a collaborative approach. The model has four stages, conducting Setting, Getting Using, andDoing (SGUD). To clarify the advantages of using the suggested model, two real cases of professional fields are explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. George Jr., C.S.: The History of Management Thought. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wanna, J.: Independence and Responsiveness – Re-tying the Gordian Knot. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67(3), 340–344 (2008), doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00591.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caldwell, C., Truong, D., Linh, P., Tuan, A.: Strategic Human Resource Management as Ethical Stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics 98(1), 171–182 (2011), doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0541-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waren Daniel, A.: The History of Management Thought. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hart, P., Vromen, A.: A New Era for Think Tanks in Public Policy? International Trends, Australian Realities. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67(2), 135–148 (2005), doi:10.1111/j.1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zou, P.X.W., Redman, S., Windon, S.: Case Studies on Risk and Opportunity at Design Stage of Building Projects in Australia: Focus on Safety. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 4(3), 221–238 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costello, T.: A New Management Framework for IT. IT Professional Magazine 12(6), 61–64 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nemeth, C.J.: Managing Innovation: When Less Is More. California Management Review 40(1), 59–74 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morris, S.A., Marshall, T.E., Rainer Jr., R.K.: Impact of user satisfaction and trust on virtual team members. Information Resources Management Journal 15(2), 22; Hospital Topics 83(2),11–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McAlearney, A., Fisher, D., Heiser, K., Robbins, D., Kelleher, K.: Developing Effective Physician Leaders: Changing Cultures and Transforming Organizations. Hospital Topics [serial online] 83(2), 11–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Gregorio, F., I-Huei, C.: Do stronger links with practice make perfect? International Journal of Advertising 28(3), 555–589 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell, M., Farrier, S.: Measuring Success in e-Learning - A Multi-Dimensional Approach. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 6(2), 99–109 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, D.: Representation, propagation, and decision issues in risk analysis under incomplete probabilistic information. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society For Risk Analysis 30(3), 361–368 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brafield, P.: Brainstorm: software and habitus in digital design. Digital Creativity 21(2), 112–126 (2010), doi:10.1080/14626268.2010.483688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Senn, G.F.: Physicians at the CFO’s door: what’s your response to requests for new technology? HFM (Healthcare Financial Management) 64(3), 92–98 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Taba, N., Khatavakhotan, A.S., Ow, S.H. (2012). A Novel Model to Improve the Efficiency of the Think Tank Room Approach for Knowledge-Based IT Environments. In: Das, V.V., Ariwa, E., Rahayu, S.B. (eds) Signal Processing and Information Technology. SPIT 2011. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 62. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32573-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32573-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32572-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32573-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics