Skip to main content

Disorder and Management: Approaching Computer Software Through Lao Tzu, Heraclitus and Gorgias

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2040 Accesses

Abstract

We live within a time of intense flux and unpredictable change. It is doubtful whether our techniques of management deal with such times very well, as they tend to look for eternal truths and forms of action and control. This paper asks whether our situation might be improved by looking to pre-Platonic philosophical sources for guidance; in this case the writings of Lao Tzu, Heraclitus and Gorgias. After exploring this background the paper considers the ways that people manage software installations, as these are exemplars of chaotic systems with unintended and often disruptive effects. The conclusion is that these ancient philosophers have something to say to us about the way our attempts to create order actually create disorder. Order and disorder are not opposites which negate each other, but are intertwined in an ‘order/disorder’ complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All translations modified by consultation with the Chinese Character and English text in Hatcher 2005.

  2. 2.

    English language expositions of Chinese medicine or Tai Chi often make a similar point: “excess yin becomes yang, and excess yang becomes yin”. However I cannot find a Chinese original. Perhaps the message is implied in the moving lines of the I-Ching, when the ‘extreme’ 6 or 9 lines move into their opposites?

  3. 3.

    In contradistinction, we might think of the kinds of description in Newtonian mechanics which do not seem to be of this general form. However, in any particular case, the predicted values may not be entirely accurate.

  4. 4.

    The definitionality is shown when mathematicians define things differently. Thus in Modulo2, 1 + 1 =0. This is perhaps not very interesting, but it does define a possible system.

References

  • Aristotle (1926). The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric (trans: Freese, J.H.). Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps towards an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. (2007). Joe Harley, CIO at the Department for work and pensions – suppliers will give us some home truths in July. Computer Weekly Blog, http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2007/05/joe-harley-cio-at-the-departme-1.html. Accessed 8th September 2012

  • Dillon, J., & Gergel, T. (2003). The Greek Sophists. Harmonsdworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotlich, D. L., & Cairo, P. C. (2003). Why CEOs fail: The 11 behaviors that can derail your climb to the top and how to manage them. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its methods (trans: Halls, W.D.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenauer, J. D. (1993). The humanities and chaos theory: A response to Steenburg’s ‘chaos at the marriage of heaven and hell’. Harvard Theological Review, 86(4), 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, J. F. (1888). Lectures on Greek philosophy. Edinburgh: William Blackwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haga, W. J., & Acocella, N. (1980). Haga’s law: Why nothing works and no one can fix it, and the more we try, the worse it gets. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, B. (2005). Lao Zi’s Dao De Jing: A matrix translation, with Chinese text.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H. S. (1931). Hippocrates vol. 4. Heracleitus on the universe. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, B. (1952). The dialogues of Plato. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Brittanica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1953). Collected works of Carl Jung vol. 6: Psychological types. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao Tzu (1993). Tao Te Ching (trans: Addiss S., & Lombardo, S.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J. (1962). The texts of Taoism. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, G. (1940). The meditations of Marcus Aurelius. In W. J. Oates (Ed.), The Stoic and Epicurean philosophers. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (2009). Depth psychology, disorder and climate change. Sydney: JungDownunder Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComiskey, B. (2002). Gorgias and the new Sophistic Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKirahan, R. (2001). Simplicius: On Aristotle’s physics 8.6-10. Cambridge: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezias, J. M., & Starbuck, W. H. (2003). Studying the accuracy of manager’s perceptions: A research Odyssey. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, C. N. (1958). Parkinson’s law: Or the pursuit of progress. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, C. N. (1960). The law and the profits. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R., Milleman, M. & Gioja, L. (2001). Surfing the Edge of Chaos: The Laws of Nature and the New Laws of Business. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, G. W. T. (1969). Heraclitus of Ephesus: A new edition combining in one volume the fragments of the work of Heraclitus of Ephesus on Nature and Heracliti Ephesii Reliquiae. Chicago: Argonaut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, L. J., & Hull, R. (1969). The Peter principle: Why things always go wrong. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek philosophical terms: A historical Lexicon. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch. (1939). Moralia (Vol. VI). Cambridge, Mass: Loeb Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saran, C. (2003). Software failures damage business. Computer Weekly, 5/27/2003, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, R. K. (1972). The Older Sophists: A Complete Translation. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Strategizing in the real world. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(1–2), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, D. (2005). Heraclitus, translation and analysis. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. (1980). The Illuminati papers. Berkeley: And/Or Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan P. Marshall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marshall, J.P. (2012). Disorder and Management: Approaching Computer Software Through Lao Tzu, Heraclitus and Gorgias. In: Prastacos, G., Wang, F., Soderquist, K. (eds) Leadership through the Classics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32445-1_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics