Skip to main content

Values-Based Leadership: Enduring Lessons from the Aeneid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership through the Classics

Abstract

This paper explored the Aeneid, Virgil’s foundation epic of the Latin cannon, from a values-based leadership perspective, which is defined as the moral foundation underlying stewardship decisions and actions of leaders. Specifically, we juxtaposed the resonant leadership elements of vision, culture and values – and their corresponding equivalent Roman themes of fatum, pietas, and virtus. Using a thematic analysis approach, we coded the following eight values: integrity, good judgment, leadership by example, decision-making, trust, justice/fairness, humility, and sense of urgency. We found that while the Aeneid extols prototypical values, the epic instructs that truly effective leadership is not about being a monochromatic prototype. Rather, the epic reveals that the essence and privilege of effective leadership demands reflection on the dynamic relationship between the leader and the led towards a better, envisioned future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Aeneid, which chronicles the story of Aeneas and his followers from their exodus after the fall of Troy in the Iliad to the founding of Rome, is composed of twelve books written in dactylic hexameter and was first published shortly after Virgil’s death in 19 BCE. The hero Aeneas was already known to Greco-Roman legend and myth, having been a minor character in the Iliad. Virgil took the disconnected tales of Aeneas’ wanderings, his vague association with the establishment of Rome, and shaped a profound national epic which established the founding myth of Rome and tied it to the legends of Troy and manifest destiny, glorified traditional Roman values which became the basis of socio-political reforms, and established unassailable legitimacy for the Julio-Claudian dynasty.

  2. 2.

    All primary quotes of the Aeneid from: Virgil (1983). The Aeneid. (R. Fitzgerald, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published c. 20 B.C.). Hereafter, only book and lines numbers will be cited.

References

  • Aaker, D. (1994). Building a brand: The Saturn story. California Management Review, 36(2), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Accenture. (2001). The evolving role of executive leadership. Retrieved from http://www.accenture.com

  • Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2000). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: NY University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagshaw, M. (1995). Liberating the liberal arts through leadership studies: An essay. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and the authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. The Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. J. E. (1999). The popular poetics and politics of the Aeneid. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 129, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (1995). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (2001). A Conversation with literary critic Harold Bloom. Harvard Business Review, 79(5), pp. 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1962). Society as symbolic interaction. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social process: An interactionist approach. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossidy, L. (2007). What your leader expects of you and what you should expect in return. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(2), 38–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowra, C. M. (1933). Aeneas and the stoic ideal. Greece and Rome, 3, 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunt, P. A., & Moore, J. M. (1967). Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The achievements of the divine Augustus. London: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchko, A. A. (2007). The effect of leadership on values-based management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1995). Transactional and transforming leadership. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), The leader’s companion (pp. 100–101). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, F. (1989). Virgil’s Augustan epic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. (1928). On the Republic (54 BCE) and On the Laws (52 BCE) (trans: Keyes C.W.). Suffolk: St. Edmundsury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J. (2009) Apr. 10. Learning from great leaders. Yahoo! Finance. Retrieved from http://finance.yahoo.com

  • Ciulla, J. (1998). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. In J. Cillua (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (pp. 3–24). Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. (1982). The gods in the Aeneid. Greece and Rome, 29(2), 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2001). Level 5 leadership. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1996). Building your company’s vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conchie, B. (2004). The demands of executive leadership. The Gallup Management Journal. Retrieved from http://gmj.gallup.com

  • Cooley, A. (2009). Res Gestae divi Augusti. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 163–177). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, D. (1967). The moral and political tradition of Rome. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. W. (1960). The expression of stoic ideas in the Aeneid. Phoenix, 14(3), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichholz, D. E. (1968). Symbol and contrast in the Aeneid. Greece & Rome, 15(2), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, R. (2000). Vergil’s ‘Shield of Aeneas’ and the “Shield of Heracles”. Mnemosyne, 53(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faules, D. F., & Alexander, D. C. (1978). Communication and social behavior: A symbolic interaction perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, T. (1989). Aeneas: A study in character development. Greece and Rome, 36(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, M. R. (1997). The shield of Turnus. Greece and Rome, 44(2), 176–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, K. (1996). August culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garaventa, E. (1998). Shakespeare’s Henry V: Fifteenth century Monarch, twentieth century leader. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 4(3), 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. (1995). The cry for leadership. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), The leader’s companion (pp. 3–7). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg, G., & Krishnan, V. R. (2003). Transformational leadership and organizational structure: The role of value-based leadership. In S. Bhargava (Ed.), Transformational leadership: Value-based management for Indian organizations (pp. 82–100). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glader, P. (2009). December 14. GE’s Immelt to cite lessons learned. The Wall Street Journal. p. B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouillart, F., & Kelly, J. (1995). Transforming the organization. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. (2009). November 11. Whitacre, critical of GM change pace, pressures CEO. Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com

  • Hahn, E. A. (1931). Pietas versus violentia in the Aeneid. The Classical Weekly, 25(2), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (1933). The Augustan principate in theory and practice during the Julio-Claudian period. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, P. R. (1985). Imago mundi: Cosmological and ideological aspects of the shield of Achilles. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbein, F. (2010). Leadership by example. Leader to Leader, 59, 4–7. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R. (2004). Augustus: Godfather of Europe. Gloucestershire: Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: Global leadership and organizational behavior effectiveness research program. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1995). Why firms succeed. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khilji, S., Davis, E., & Cseh, M. (2010). Building competitive advantage in a global environment: Leadership and the mindset. In T. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), The past, present and future of international business & management (Advances in international management, Vol. 23, pp. 353–373). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korfmacher, W. C. (1956). Vergil, spokesman for the Augustan reforms. The Classical Journal, 51(7), 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leebaert, D. (2006). To dare & conquer. New York: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, L. A. (1963). Hero and theme in the Aeneid. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 94, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majer, K. (2005). Values-based leadership: A revolutionary approach to business success and personal prosperity. Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 10(1), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Ernst, C. (2005). Exploring leadership in times of paradox and complexity. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interpretive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGushin, P. (1964). Virgil and the spirit of endurance. American Journal of Philology, 85(3), 225–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37(2), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D., & Bazerman, M. (2001). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, 3, 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. J. (1928). Vergil’s motivation of the Aeneid. The Classical Journal, 24(1), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (2002). The hidden dimension of blue-collar sense-making about workplace communication. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 288–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1998). From war-hero to villain: Reversal of the symbolic value of war and a warrior king. Journal of Peace Research, 35(4), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwood, J. (1991). Aeneas, Augustus, and the theme of the city. Greece & Rome, 38(2), 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss Reimers, J., & Barbuto, J. E. (2002). A framework exploring the effects of the Machiavellian disposition on the relationship between motivation and influence tactics. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(2), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J. (1995). The executive’s compass: Business and the good society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ovid. (1916). Metamorphoses (trans: Miller, F.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, K. W., & Proctor-Thomson, S. B. (2002). Perceived integrity of transformational leaders in organizational settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quint, D. (1989). Epic and empire. Comparative Literature, 41(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, J. A. (1976). Symbolism in Virgil: Skeleton key or will-o’-the-wisp? Greece and Rome, 23(2), 142–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri, A. (2009). Jim Senergal: Costco CEO focuses on employees. US New & World Report. Retreived from http://www.usnews.com.

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Double Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, P. O. R. (1948). In the steps of Aeneas. Greece and Rome, 17(51), 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetenbaum, T. J. (1999). Beating the odds of merger and acquisition failure: Seven key practices that improve the chance for expected integration and synergies. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Good judgment in international politics: Three psychological perspectives. Political Psychology, 13(3), 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1993). Business sense: Exercising management’s five freedoms. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T., Schermerhorn, J., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. & Bennis, W. (2007). Making the tough call. Inc, 29, 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N., & Bennis, W. (2010). Wise judgment. Leadership Excellence, 27(5), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M., & Ulrich, D. O. (1984). The leadership challenge–A call for the transformational leader. Sloan Management Review, 26, 59–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toll, K. (1997). Making Roman-Ness and the “Aeneid”. Classical Antiquity, 16(1), 34–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lee, R., Fabish, L., & McGaw, N. (2005). The value of corporate values. Strategy Business, 39, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgil (1983). The Aeneid. (R. Fitzgerald, Trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published c. 20 BCE).

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. (1994). In the wake of Aeneas. Greece and Rome, 41(1), 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, D. (1994). The heart aroused. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. (1969). Action and emotion in Aeneas. Greece and Rome, 16(1), 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Ahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahn, M., Ettner, L. (2012). Values-Based Leadership: Enduring Lessons from the Aeneid. In: Prastacos, G., Wang, F., Soderquist, K. (eds) Leadership through the Classics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32445-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics