Advertisement

The Fight Against Terrorism: A Key Global Objective for the EU?

  • Raphael BossongEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.3k Downloads
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

The continued activities of Al Qaeda and affiliated terrorist actors have been a top priority of international security policy over the last decade. Since 9/11, the EU attempted to develop a comprehensive counter-terrorism policy that reaches across functional and geographic boundaries. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of this dimension of the EU’s changing global role. The first part presents a brief historical introduction to the EU’s counter-terrorism cooperation since the 1970s. The second part surveys of three different strands of the EU’s current external counter-terrorism policy: (1) engagement in external conflicts that are likely to fan international terrorist activity, (2) support for the global counter-terrorist regime, (3) regional or transatlantic protection against terrorism. The third part assesses the impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on the EU’s external counter-terrorism policy and outlines current initiatives for reinforced security assistance to Sub-Saharan Africa. The chapter concludes that the EU experienced dynamic changes in matters of police and justice cooperation, but did not mobilize all its available instruments and resources to combat terrorism beyond its borders.

Keywords

Organize Crime Security Policy Human Trafficking International Terrorism Lisbon Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahmed, V. & Farooq, A. W. (2010). Nexus between Aid and Security: The Case of Pakistan. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29310/1/Pakistan_Aid_Paper.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  2. Alvarez-Verdug, M. (2005). Comparing U.S. and E.U. strategies against weapons of mass destruction. Some legal consequences. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 11(1), 119–140.Google Scholar
  3. Argomaniz, J. (2011). The EU and counter-terrorism: politics, polity and policies after 9/11. Contemporary terrorism studies.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. APRODEV, CIDSE, et al. (2011). EU news October. http://www.caritas-europa.org/module/FileLib/EUNEWS4-October2011.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  5. Balzacq, T. (2009). The frontiers of governance. Understanding the external dimension of EU justice and home affairs. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), The external dimension of EU justice and home affairs, governance, neighbours, security (pp. 1–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bapat, N. A. (2011). Transnational terrorism, US military aid, and the incentive to misrepresent. Journal of Peace Research, 48(3), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros, X. (2012). The external dimension of EU counter-terrorism: the challenges of the European Parliament in front of the European Court of Justice. European Security, online first publication.Google Scholar
  8. Bergen, P., Hoffman, B., & Tiedemann, K. (2011). Assessing the Jihadist terrorist threat to America and American interests. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 34(2), 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brzoska, M. (2011). The Role of Effectiveness and Efficiency in the European Union's Counter-terrorism Policy: The Case of Terrorist Financing. EUSECON Working Paper, 51.Google Scholar
  10. Brück, T., & Xu G. (2011). Who gives aid to whom and when? Aid accelerations, shocks and policies. EUSECON Working Paper, 49.Google Scholar
  11. Bossong, R. (2008). The action plan on combating terrorism: A flawed instrument of EU security governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
  12. Bunyan, T. (1993). Trevi, Europol and the European state. Statewatching the new Europe. A handbook on the European state. Nottingham: Russell Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bures, O. (2011). EU counter-terrorism policy: a paper tiger? Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Coolsaet, R. (2010). EU counter-terrorism strategy. Value added or chimera? International Affairs, 86(4), 857–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Council of the European Union (2001). Conclusions and plan of action of the extraordinary meeting of the European Council Meeting on September 21. SN140/01.Google Scholar
  16. Council of the European Union (2003a). A secure Europe in a better world. European Security Strategy. 15859/03.Google Scholar
  17. Council of the European Union (2003b). Fight against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction—EU strategy against proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. 15708/03.Google Scholar
  18. Council of the European Union (2004a). Declaration on combating terrorism. 7906/04.Google Scholar
  19. Council of the European Union (2004b). EU counter-terrorism clauses. Assessment. 14458/2/04.Google Scholar
  20. Council of the European Union (2005). The European Union counter-terrorism strategy. 14469/1/05 REV 1.Google Scholar
  21. Council of the European Union (2010a) EU Counter-terrorism Strategy—Discussion paper. 15894/1/10. Google Scholar
  22. Council of the European Union (2010b). Six-monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. 17080/10.Google Scholar
  23. Council of the European Union (2010c). Relations with Morocco—Adoption of the European Union’s position for the Association Council’s ninth meeting. 17064/10.Google Scholar
  24. Council of the European Union (2010d). Internal Security Strategy for the European Union: “Towards a European Security Model”. 7120/10.Google Scholar
  25. Council of the European Union (2010e). EU action plan on combating terrorism. 15893/1/10.Google Scholar
  26. Council of the European Union (2011a). Report on the implementation of the revised Strategy on Terrorist Financing. 15062/11.Google Scholar
  27. Council of the European Union (2011b). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on the use of passenger name record data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime—The possible inclusion of intra-EU flights. 8016/1/11.Google Scholar
  28. Council of the European Union (2011c). Summary of conclusions of the EU-US JHA Ministerial Meeting, 21 November 2011, Washington.17488/11.Google Scholar
  29. Council of the European Union (2011d). EU Counter-terrorism Strategy—Discussion paper. 17595/11.Google Scholar
  30. Council of the European Union (2011e). Recommendations for JAIEX working methods 14145/11.Google Scholar
  31. Council of the European Union (2011f). Report to the European Parliament and national Parliaments on the proceedings of the Standing Committee on operational cooperation on internal security for the period January 2010–June 2011. 14614/11. Google Scholar
  32. Council of the European Union (2011g). Working method for closer cooperation and coordination in the field of EU security. 10715/11.Google Scholar
  33. Council of the European Union (2011h). Horn of Africa—Council Conclusions. 16858/11.Google Scholar
  34. Commission of the European Communities (2004). Revised national indicative programme 2002–2004 Philippines. http://eeas.europa.eu/philippines/csp/nip_rev_02_04.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  35. Commission of the European Communities (2005). Partnership Agreement ACP-EC. Signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000. Revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/infopoint/publications/development/2b_en.htm. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  36. Commission of the European Communities (2011). Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the use and transfer of Passenger Name Records to the United States Department of Homeland Security. COM(2011) 807 final.Google Scholar
  37. Den Boer, M. & Monar, J. (2002). 11 September and global terrorism as a challenge to the EU as a security actor. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(Annual review), 11–28.Google Scholar
  38. De Vries, G. (2008). The nexus between EU crisis management and counter terrorism. In S. Blockmans (Ed.), The European Union and Crisis Management. Policy and Legal Aspects (pp. 355–374). The Hague: TCM Asser Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. De Zwaan, J. (2012). The new governance of justice and home affairs: Towards further supranationalism. In S. Wolff, F. Goudappel, & J. W. de Zwaan (Eds.), Freedom, security and justice after Lisbon and Stockholm (pp. 7–26). The Hague: TCM Asser Press.Google Scholar
  40. Eder, F. (2011). The European Union’s counter-terrorism policy towards the Maghreb: trapped between democratisation, economic interests and the fear of destabilisation. European Security, 20(3), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. European External Action Service (2011). Strategy for security and development in the Sahel. http://eeas.europa.eu/africa/docs/sahel_strategy_en.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  42. European Union. (2006). Joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union Development Policy: “The European Consensus”. Official Journal of the European Union C, 46, 1–19.Google Scholar
  43. EUROPOL (2009). TE-SAT 2008—EU Terrorism Situation and trend report. The Hague: EUROPOL.Google Scholar
  44. Freytag, A., Krüger, J. J., et al. (2010). The origins of terrorism. Cross-country estimates on socio-ECONOMIC determinants of Terrorism. EUSECON Working Paper, 27.Google Scholar
  45. Guild, E. (2008). The Uses and Abuses of Counter-terrorism policies in Europe: The case of the terrorist list. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 173–193.Google Scholar
  46. Grip, L. (2009). The EU Non-Proliferation Clause: a preliminary assessment. SIPRI Background paper.Google Scholar
  47. Innes, M. A. (2005). Terrorist sanctuaries and Bosnia-Herzegovina: Challenging conventional assumptions. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28(4), 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Islam, S. (2011). Pakistan on the brink: How the EU can bolster reform and fight extremism. In G. Geeraerts & E. Gross (Eds.), Perspectives for a European Security Strategy Towards Asia: Views from Asia (pp. 69–90). Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
  49. Donais, T. (Ed.). (2008). Local ownership and security sector reform. DCAF Yearbook 6. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Joffe, G. (2008). The European Union, democracy and counter-terrorism in the Maghreb. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 147–171.Google Scholar
  51. Kaunert, C. (2010a). The external dimension of EU counter-terrorism relations. Competences, interests, and institutions. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kaunert, C. (2010b). Europol and EU counter-terrorism: International Security Actorness in the External Dimension. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(7), 652–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Korski, D., & Gowan, R. (2009). Can the EU rebuild failing states? A review of Europe’s civilian capacities. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  54. Le Jeune, P. (1992). La coopération policière européenne contre le terrorisme. Brüssel: Établissements Émile Bruylant.Google Scholar
  55. Meyer, C. O. (2009). International terrorism as a force of homogenization? A constructivist approach to understanding cross-national threat perceptions and responses. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(4), 647–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Manners, I. (2006). Normative power Europe reconsidered. Beyond the crossroadsBeyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 182–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Messari, N., & van der Klaauw, J. (2010). Counter-terrorism measures and refugee protection in North Africa. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(4), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mincheva, L., & Gurr, T. (2010). Unholy Alliances. Evidence on linkages between trans-state terrorism and crime networks. the case of Bosnia. In W. Benedek, C. Daase, & D. Voijn (Eds.), Transnational Terrorism, Organised Crime and Peace-Building (pp. 190–206). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  59. Mueller, J. E. (2009). Atomic obsession: nuclear alarmism from Hiroshima to al-Qaeda. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Lum, C. (2009). The evidence-based policing matrix. Ideas in American Policing, 11, 1–16.Google Scholar
  61. Pokalova, E. (2010). Framing separatism as terrorism: Lessons from Kosovo. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(5), 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rees, W., & Aldrich, R. J. (2005). Contending cultures of counter-terrorism: transatlantic divergence or convergence? International Affairs, 81(5), 905–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rees, W. (2006). Transatlantic counter-terrorism cooperation. The new imperative. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Ripoll Servent, A., & MacKenzie, A. (2011). Is the EP still a data protection Champion? The case of SWIFT. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 12(4), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Romaniuk, P. (2010). Multilateral counter-terrorism: the global politics of cooperation and contestation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Salter, M. B. (2010). Mapping transatlantic security relations: the EU, Canada, and the war on terror. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Schmitter, P. (1969). Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration. International Organization, 23(1), 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shepherd, A. (2006). Irrelevant or indispensable? ESDP, the ‘War on Terror’ and the fallout from Iraq. International Politics, 43(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shortland, A. & Vothknecht, M. (2011). Combating “Maritime Terrorism” off the Coast of Somalia. EUSECON Working Paper, 47.Google Scholar
  70. Smis, S., & Kingah, S. (2008). The utility of counter-terrorism and non-proliferation of WMD clauses under the EU-APC revised Cotonou Agreement. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(1), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, M. E. (2011). A liberal grand strategy in a realist world? Power, purpose and the EU’s changing global role. Journal of European Public Policy 18(2), 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. The Guardian (2008). Bomb plot targeted seven Heathrow flights, court told. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/apr/03/plane.plot. Accessed 4 July 2012.
  73. Van Ham, P. (2011). The European Union’s WMD Strategy and the CSFP: A critical analysis. EU Non-Proliferation Network, Non-Proliferation Papers, 2.Google Scholar
  74. Van Hüllen, V. (2011). Europeanisation through cooperation? EU democracy promotion in Morocco and Tunisia. West European Politics, 35(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Varrenti, M. G. (2010). EU Development cooperation after Lisbon: The role of the European External Action Service. College of Europe EU Diplomacy Papers.Google Scholar
  76. Vlcek, W. (2006). Acts to COMBAT the financing of terrorism: Common foreign and security policy at the European Court of Justice. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11(4), 491–554.Google Scholar
  77. Wagner, W. (2011). Die demokratische Kontrolle internationalisierter Sicherheitspolitik. Demokratiedefizite bei Militäreinsätzen und in der europäischen Politik innerer Sicherheit. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  78. Wennerholm, P., Brattberg, E. & Rhinard, M. (2010). The EU as a counter terrorism actor abroad: finding the opportunities, overcoming constraints. European Policy Centre Issue Paper, c.Google Scholar
  79. Young, J., & Findley, M. (2011). Can peace be purchased? A sectoral-level analysis of aid’s influence on transnational terrorism. Public Choice, 149(3), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Youngs, R. (2010). The EU’s role in world politics. A retreat from liberal internationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Peace Research and Security PolicyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations