Gender Equality in European Union Development Policy

  • Petra DebusscherEmail author
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)


This chapter critically examines gender mainstreaming in EU development aid to assess whether or not the EU can be considered a leading and distinctive gender actor. To answer this question I will analyse the budget, gendered language and frame of high level policy programming documents. First I evaluate whether a shift has been made from a conservative Women in Development paradigm to a transformative Gender and Development paradigm to determine if the EU lives up to European and international commitments on gender equality and can be considered to be leading by example. Second I examine whether the EU advocates a distinctive ‘Europeanness’ in its gender policy towards developing countries. The chapter concludes that the shift towards a transformative Gender and Development paradigm has only partly been made. Moreover, I argue that rather than a distinctive ‘Europeanness’, the EU’s gender equality approach can be called a patchwork of approaches derived from other international institutions such as the UN or the World Bank. This implies that the EU is not the innovative leading gender power it claims to be.


United Nations Gender Equality Gender Inequality Development Cooperation Development Paradigm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barton, C. (2005). Where to for women’s movements and the MDGs? Gender and Development, 13(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroncelli, E. (2011). The EU at the World Bank: institutional and policy performance. Journal of European Integration, 33(6), 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beetham, G. (2010). Gender, poverty and aid architecture. In S. Chant (Ed.), Handbook on gender and poverty (pp. 497–503). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Brym, R., et al. (2005). In faint praise of the WB’s gender development policy. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budlender, D. (2004). Why should we care about unpaid care work? New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  6. Budlender, D. (2008). The Statistical Evidence on Care and Non-Care Work Across Six Countries (Programme Paper No. 4). Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  7. Chant, S. (2007). Gender, cities, and the millennium development goals in the global south’ (New series working Paper, Issue 21). London: LSE Gender Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Chant, S. (2010). The international handbook of gender and poverty: concepts, research, policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Europe. (1998). Gender mainstreaming. Conceptual framework, Methodology and Presentation of Good Practices. Final Report of Activities of the Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  10. Debusscher, P. (2011). Mainstreaming gender in European commission development policy: conservative Europeanness? Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debusscher, P. (2012a) Mainstreaming gender in European Union development policy in the European neighborhood. Journal of Women Politics and Policy, 33(4), 322–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debusscher, P. (2012b) Gender mainstreaming in European Union development policy toward Latin America: transforming gender relations or confirming hierarchies? Latin American Perspectives, 39(6), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Debusscher, P., & True, J. (2009). Lobbying the EU for Gender-Equal Development. In J. Orbie & L. Tortell (Eds.), The EU and the social dimension of globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Debusscher, P., & Van der Vleuten, A. (2012). Mainstreaming gender in European Union development cooperation with sub-Saharan Africa: promising numbers, narrow contents, telling silences. International Development Planning Review, 34(3), 319–338. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2012.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elson, D., & Cagatay, N. (2000). The social content of macroeconomic policies. World Development, 28(7), 1347–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elson, D., & Sharp, R. (2010). Gender-responsive budgeting and women’s poverty. In S. Chant (Ed.), Handbook on gender and poverty (pp. 522–27). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission (2001). Programme of Action for the Mainstreaming of Gender Equality in Community Development Cooperation. COM(2001) 295, 21 June.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission (2002a). EthiopiaEuropean Community. Country Strategy Paper and National Indicative Programme for the period 20022007.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (2002b). Syria Country Strategy Paper 20022006 and National Indicative Programme 20022004.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission (2007a). Gender Equality and Women Empowerment in Development Cooperation. COM(2007) 100, 8 March.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (2007b). Syrian Arab Republic Strategy Paper 20072013 and National Indicative Programme 20072010.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission (2007c). Algeria Strategy Paper 20072013 and National Indicative Programme 20072010.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2007d). Morocco National Indicative Programme 20072010.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission (2007e). Egypt Country Strategy Paper 20072013.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission (2007f). Ecuador Country Strategy Papers 20072013, 10.04.2007 (E/2007/621).Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2010). EU Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Womens Empowerment in Development 20102015. SEC(2010) 265, 8 March.Google Scholar
  27. European Council (1995). Resolution on Integrating Gender Issues in Development Cooperation. 12847/95, 20 December.Google Scholar
  28. European Council (1998). Regulation on Integrating of Gender Issues in Development Cooperation. 2836/98, 22 December.Google Scholar
  29. European Parliament and Council (2004). Regulation on Promoting Gender Equality in Development Cooperation. 806/2004, 21 April.Google Scholar
  30. Gammage, S. (2010). Time pressed and time poor: unpaid household work in Guatemala. Feminist Economics, 16(3), 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnsson-Latham, G. (2010). Power, privilege and gender as reflected in poverty analysis and development goals. In S. Chant (Ed.), The international handbook of gender and poverty (pp. 41–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. McCrae, H. (2010). The EU as a gender equal polity: myths and realities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohanty, C. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Moser, C. (1993). Gender planning and development: theory, practice and training. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moser, C., & Moser, A. (2005). Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A review of success and limitations in international institutions. Gender & Development, 13(2), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molyneux, M. (2006). Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: progresa/oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme. Social Policy & Administration, 40(4), 425–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2007). Mainstreaming gender or “streaming” gender away: feminists marooned in the development business. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: contradictions, contestations & challenges (pp. 135–149). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  38. OECD-DAC (2002). EC Development cooperation review. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  39. Orbie, J., Del Biondo, K., Delputte, S., Reynaert, V., Verschaeve J., Bossuyt F. (2012) Still a Norm Taker? European Union Development Policy in the Shadow of the World Bank. Paper presented at the EUIA conference, Brussels, 3–5 May 2012.Google Scholar
  40. Pető, A., & Manners, I. (2006). The European Union and the value of gender equality. In I. Manners & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Razavi, S. (2007). The political and social economy of care in a development context: conceptual issues, research questions and policy options. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  42. Roy, A. (2010). Millennial woman: the gender order of development. In S. Chant (Ed.), The international handbook of gender and poverty (pp. 548–53). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Saith, A. (2006). From universal values to MDGs: lost in translation. Development and Change, 37(6), 1167–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santiso, C. (2003). Sisyphus in the castle: improving European Union strategies for democracy promotion and governance conditionality. The European Journal of Development Research, 15(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schech, S., & Vas Dev, S. (2007). Gender justice: the World Bank’s new approach to the poor? Development in Practice, 17(1), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Subrahmanian, R. (2007). Making sense of gender in shifting institutional contexts: some reflections on gender mainstreaming. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: contradictions, contestations and challenges (pp. 112–21). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  47. Verloo, M. (2005). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe: a critical frame analysis. The Greek Review of Social Research, 117(B), 11–34.Google Scholar
  48. Walby, S. (2005). Measuring women’s progress in a global era. International Social Science Journal, 2(57), 371–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank (2006) Gender Equality as Smart Economics: A World Bank Group Gender Action Plan (Fiscal years 2007–10) September, 2006 Accessed 22 March 2012.
  50. World Bank (2012). Implications of World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development for the World Bank Group Accessed 7 April 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for EU Studies, Department of Political SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations